Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[stivep]

So, the idea here is to sync those two frequencies together, to produce an interference pulse .

watch video at:
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/hs-physics/x215e29cb31244fa1:wave-properties/x215e29cb31244fa1:wave-interference/v/wave-interference-pulses

http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys283/lectures/pulse/pulse.html

which is supposed to account for an additional energy output. The problem is that, it doesn't.

There is no additional energy out.
energy can't be created nor destroyed - law
Energy can only be acquired, transferred into _{( from outside of the system)} and converted to represent the same form of energy.

here is a quote:

The principle of superposition may be applied to waves whenever two (or more) waves are traveling through the same medium at the same time. There are two conditions the waves must meet to produce interference patterns. Waves must be of the same kind. Obviously, a light wave cannot interfere with a sound wave as they are of different nature.

https://physics.icalculator.info/waves/interference-of-waves.html
Wesley

[NickZ]

   I am aware of what conventional science says about "interference waves". However, that does not explain how superpositioning of two waves can affect a substantial GAIN. Much, much higher than just their "additive" or constructive properties.
Destructive or constructive wave properties are not what these devices are about. Nor will science give a proper explanation, ever.As they don't even believe in such a thing as free energy. Or better said, energy from the surrounding ambient. Nor does Wesley believe in what Tesla called the source of all, the Aether. So, without tapping into that explanation of a supposed source, there is no gain. He's right there. So, Wesley keep looking for the guy with the hidden transmitter, across the way.
  We have already heard Wesley telling us many times now about how energy can't be produced or destroyed, pretty boring, unless you're in third grade. But, that is not what we need to know, in order to find the answer to free energy.
   We also know, and already have heard about "conversions" devices as well. So, repeating the same thing, does not help much  now, any more than all the other previous times. We have already heard about all that, and so don't try to confuse the issue with, can't get more out than in. Without talking about a source. A source for those "conversions" devices.
Unless you believe in the Big Bang, as well as everything else that "science" has to say about free energy from electrical devices. Nor will you ever hear from current science about how the superposition of interuptive waves can create free energy, nor how.   Tesla did have an explanation, and pointed to how when his electrical generator switch was turned off, the guy doing so, didn't fair too well, afterwards.

[SolarLab]

 Energy gain is NOT achieved by wave addition (interference waves) since each wave only adds it's original power to the coincident wave.
A reflected wave on a transmission line caused by a short or open at one, or both, ends will incrementally increase in value over many
reflections but will not yield excess energy.

Energy gain IS achieved by ELECTRON VELOCITY through " e = mc² or e = mv² " where e is the energy, m is the mass of the electron,
and c² is the square of the speed of light, or v² is the velocity of the electron. 

As the speed of the electron mass increases, the kinetic energy of the electron increases by the square of it's velocity. The electron velocity
is set by the High Voltage used to propel it.

A higher voltage will increase the electron mass velocity, which in turn, increases the electron kinetic energy. Also, the dv/dt or di/dt
plays a role in the kinetic energy increase; with all things being equal, the faster you accelerate the electron (or any other mass) over an
equal time period, the more energy is gained. Think bullets or explosives or what ever.

And, the more often you do this (more occurances) the energy will build up more quickly; therefore, with a higher frequency of occurance,
the more kinetic energy will be put into the system over the same period of time. Think pressure washer versus 5/8" hose, both consume
5 gallons per minute but the pressure washer is more effective at removing dirt or drilling or cutting, it produces more kinetic energy.

High Voltage Electron Acceleration is used in older CRT Televisions and Oscilloscopes. Magnetic fields will deflect the electron path but will
not accelerate the electron (mass), as seen in the CRT deflection yoke. When you adjust the brightness control, you are increasing the
high voltage (either directly or by manipulating a grid).

One method of transfering the electron kinetic energy is to velocity modulate (bunching) another adjacent signal or wave. This transfer
mechanism is used in Travelling Wave Tubes and a similar energy transfer mechanizsm is used in Ruslan/Kapanadze type generators.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA

In turn, Resonance will NOT provide excess energy but can be used to greatly increase the efficiency of a system. Inductors with, or without,
ferromagnetic (iron) cores can be made to achieve excess energy by varying their inductance during operation. This is seen in a similar
way when considering the inductor B-H Curve, however the gain is a result of the inductor characteristics.

[AlienGrey]

Max your circuit with a 74hc132 shmit good idea doing it that way but the feed back needs a 2 trimmers in my test set up (component spread different manufacturing perhaps )  it needs apparently zero crossing sync at start and finish 50% sqr wave other wise its not sqr, some thing like the gigagram bellow.

See scope shot after mod on my setup, chears

Sil

[NickZ]

   SL:   You mentioned: "Energy gain IS achieved by ELECTRON VELOCITY through " e = mc² or e = mv² " where e is the energy, m is the mass of the electron, and c² is the square of the speed of light, or v² is the velocity of the electron."                                                                                                                                               end quote
   So, SL do you have any proof of the above. As you know, electrons don't have mass, so not sure about what "electron mass" has to do with free energy. Electrons are not material or physical particles, either. It sounds like it takes the harvesting of "mass", to obtain energy. That is what science thinks, but that is not correct, concerning free energy harvesting. I didn't know that it takes electron mass to obtain free energy. I have learned that it takes energy to have mass. If there is no energy, and no energy fields in space, there would be no material mass, anywhere. As "everything is energy", according to Tesla, as well as his ideas on the Cosmic Soup, and it's source.

   I also have my doubts about the "speed of electrons". Or if there is any thing to "movement" of electrons, at all. How about waves? Do waves actually move from one place A to another place B???  Does light actually move? Such as the speed of light?
What is moving? These are not just details, in my book. And can aid in the understanding of a medium which we can't see.
     
   
   
BTW: Guys, I am very disgusted by what I see still going on at OUR.com.  It's sick, what is allowed to happen with the Troll there. No use posting anything there, as this guy will just regurgitate another one of his paid for replies, about how free energy does not exist, and that never has existed. And how dumb we all are for even trying. Yet he is in a free energy forum to disrupt it, and will never have anything to do with what the forum is about. No matter what proof is shown. HE is no ones friend, nor is he there to help. As his free time is not free, but paid for, and explains how it seams that he has so much free time. Don't be fooled, like the admin there, and Ramset are.  They may disagree with my judgements, but this will continue on for a few more years. Or until his paycheck runs out. I am not the only one that thinks so, several other member there have voiced there complaints, yet nothing is being done about it.  I know what I would do with him... and it would be the 4th or 5t forum he gets banned from for trying to ruin their work and research. I guess that the admin does not care, too busy, or ...   But, I won't post there, nor will a few others.
  He was known by a different name here,  F2.... but "he won't post here" now. Guess why...   
   
   NickZ