Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[onepower]

Solarlab

Energy gain is NOT achieved by wave addition (interference waves) since each wave only adds it's original power to the coincident wave.
A reflected wave on a transmission line caused by a short or open at one, or both, ends will incrementally increase in value over many
reflections but will not yield excess energy.

Energy gain IS achieved by ELECTRON VELOCITY through " e = mc2 or e = mv2 " where e is the energy, m is the mass of the electron,
and c2 is the square of the speed of light, or v2 is the velocity of the electron. 

That may be the most relevant and intelligent statement I have heard here in a long time, well said.

Regards
AC

[maxolous]

IMHO, SL had ever been helping by making materials available to explore.
Who are these pple trying to disrupt this forum by stirring up strife or conducting themselves in such a way to cause confusion everywhere.
They cry more than the bereaved to gain attention and thereby distract.
If their may purpose is to distract,
why are they doing that?
Are they bank rolled for this purpose?
Who are the pple paying them?
If these pple are always with us , we go nowhere. That means to say, their purpose achieved.

Maxolous

[AlienGrey]

Quote

Energy gain is NOT achieved by wave addition (interference waves) since each wave only adds it's original power to the coincident wave.
A reflected wave on a transmission line caused by a short or open at one, or both, ends will incrementally increase in value over many
reflections but will not yield excess energy.

unquote

I'm not sure that's entirely a true statement. I can remember my collage days a different century doing
this test with 50 ohm co-ax a TX device and a scope, if the stub was set to a pacific frequency and the stub
was O/C or S/C we got a reflection in phase or 90 deg out of phase, if the reflection was in phase but opposite
we got a canceling egg shape however if in phase and tuned to be on top of the original it added with a bigger
amplitude and this could blow up the receiver. So what do you believe

Sil

[stivep]

Quote from SolarLab:

Energy gain is NOT achieved by wave addition (interference waves) since each wave only adds it's original power to the coincident wave.
A reflected wave on a transmission line caused by a short or open at one, or both, ends will incrementally increase in value over many
reflections but will not yield excess energy.

response from AlienGrey to SolarLab comment:

I'm not sure that's entirely a true statement. I can remember my collage days a different century doing
this test with 50 ohm co-ax a TX device and a scope, if the stub was set to a pacific frequency and the stub
was O/C or S/C we got a reflection in phase or 90 deg out of phase, if the reflection was in phase but opposite
we got a canceling egg shape however if in phase and tuned to be on top of the original it added with a bigger
amplitude and this could blow up the receiver. So what do you believe

Sil

"When a pulse signal is applied to the beginning of a two-conductor cable, the reactive elements
of that cable (i.e. capacitance between the conductors, inductance along the cable length) begin to store energy.
This translates to a current drawn by the cable from the source of the pulse, as though the cable were acting as a (momentarily) resistive load.
If the cable under test were infinitely long, this charging effect would never end, and the cable would indeed behave exactly
like a resistor from the perspective of the signal source."
However, real cables (having finite length) do stop "charging" after some time following the application of a voltage signal at one end.
From the perspective of an electrical pulse, measured on a time scale of nanoseconds, we refer to any cable as a transmission line.
_{All electrical cables act as transmission lines}, but the effects just mentioned are so brief in duration
that we only notice them when the cable is exceptionally long and/or the pulse durations are exceptionally short (i.e. high-frequency signals).

"after the pulse signal has had time to travel down the length of the transmission line and reflect back to the source
does the cable stop acting as a load and begin acting as a plain pair of wires." end of quote.
https://control.com/textbook/ac-electricity/transmission-lines/

AlienGrey is absolutely right.
- open end of transmission line where _{All electrical cables act as transmission lines}
adds amplitude 1 time only.!!!!!! it is not pumping  action in time frame.
-short  end of transmission line  reverses a pulse and in effect _(likely) cancels totally - the entire forward pulse by its  reflected pulse
- 50 ohm purely resistive load at the end of  50 ohm transmission line  dissipates 100% of energy from the source.

________________________________________________________________________

Interesting is that SolarLab is becoming better and better  like kid that graduated some time ago a High school and now is  almost a bachelor .
With time he may be able to place me in the corner too.
I hope..

Wesley

[NickZ]

Solarlab
That may be the most relevant and intelligent statement I have heard here in a long time, well said.

Regards
AC

   AC:  You mean that you would like it to be relevant and intelligent. But, is it, really? I did ask for some proof, as that is a claim.   Without proof, we are just pissing into the wind. So, don't get offensive. But, conventional science will not disclose one iota about how free energy works.
 
    I mentioned basically the same thing as SL, but, that there is only a slight benefit in output, from just an additive wave, nor will it produce OU, nor self running. As that is what this is all about, not just running one wave onto another one, without much if any additional output. Or, what's the point? Accelerating electrons, at what cost? No cost?
   
   However, an interuptive signal wave, will, that is the difference. It is NOT additive, but interuptive, instead.  The idea is to use that type of wave signal or action, instead. Which is what I have been trying to do. Same as was shown by Ruslan, Stalker, and Adrian, etc.
   
   However, IF it's the harvesting of Mass that you want, that is not OU, nor free energy, as it's still burning material things up, for energy. Aren't we beyond that??? I guess not...

    Anyway, that is the way I understand what it takes for free energy to be real. At least we hope to see it doing so, soon.
  Like the woodpecker signal used in defense, and in weapons of war, which is able to injure people by this focused EM pulse.
   Of course, you can always just keep burning things, as in a wood burning stove. Like Europe is going to need to do this winter.But, in some areas of the U.S, even a B.B.Q. fire is not even permitted. Soon that's how it will have to be everywhere.   I doubt that the space ships that you saw flying around were running on wood burners...  Right? AC?

   NickZ