Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet motor idea - again.

Started by Low-Q, September 20, 2012, 09:43:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

ionizer

What makes you think having no sticky spot means overunity?
I have seen several motors without sticky spots but they only run smoother they still consume more then they can generate.

Low-Q

Quote from: ionizer on September 26, 2012, 12:55:16 AM
What makes you think having no sticky spot means overunity?
I have seen several motors without sticky spots but they only run smoother they still consume more then they can generate.
I see the confusion.
Generally, a magnet motor will have as much energy to run as the counter energy which balance the output to zero. A sticky spot isn't neccessarily the cause why the motor doesn't run, but in my preliminary experiments I have observed only "driving forces", and no counter force, or "sticky spots" which should stop the experiment from running. There hasn't been any obstacles in the cycle, so to speak.


But again, this is preliminary experiments, and done by hand - and as you all know, experiments by hand will very often confuse the conclusion.


I am in progress with a simple prototype. That experiment will tell everything wether this works or not.


Vidar

powercat


I remember somebody on this forum I think it was bill, saying that if you clamp 2 magnates together
the opposing fields after an amount of time change back to a normal configuration.


I could be wrong on this so I will send bill a linked to this
When logic and proportion Have fallen
Go ask Alice When she's ten feet tall

Low-Q

Quote from: powercat on September 26, 2012, 06:10:47 AM
I remember somebody on this forum I think it was bill, saying that if you clamp 2 magnates together
the opposing fields after an amount of time change back to a normal configuration.


I could be wrong on this so I will send bill a linked to this
OK. I'm not sure how you picture the "clamp together". Do you mean clamped together as the bar I have drawn in reply #3?


The fields between the moving and the stationary magnets are vertically aligned (South and north up or down), so it should not weaken the magnets the same way as when the field is opposing eachother directly south towards south for example....


I'll wait to see what Bill meant about this. Thanks for the input.



Vidar

powercat

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obV4bUd4JmI&feature=g-upl

I was looking at the video you linked in Reply 1 , the meshing together of the magnates
which made me recall reading something about magnates been clamped together.
It's good to hear you don't think there is a problem.

Breaking the sticking spot problem would indeed be a great leap forward.
If a magnet can move 1 inch why not 1 mile
All the best
PC
When logic and proportion Have fallen
Go ask Alice When she's ten feet tall