Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

NRamaswami

I'm making an attempt to replicate the Figuera device exactly as shown in the patent. We have succeeded in building the rotary device but the sparks still come and so we need to rebuild the rotary device to ensure that the brush will touch the three adjoining plates always. It must always keep touch two adjoining plates and when it does it there is a spark when the brush for a moment touches only one of the contact points. So we will rebuild it. This will be an exact replication of the Figuera patent. The drawing appears to hide significant information as well as the description at the end about how the machine is continuously run. I'm not yet clear on these points. We have put a step down gear to reduce the speed of rotation to test what happens. 50 % of the time the brush touches two points and 50% of the time the brush touches single point only. Had we not used the step down gear box it would not have been visible to us. Therefore if the spark is to be avoided we need it to touch three contact points at 50% of the time and 2 contact points at 50% of the time. Then the rotary device will work perfectly without sparks is what we believe but we can say that only after the testing is over.

This will be an exact replica of the 1908 patent. After a lot of tests we believe we can replicate it.

Please see photos of the rotary device and the video of the rotary device with the step down gear. Once the sparks are removed completely by makeing the copper contact points larger or by reducing the size of the card board to make the brush touch three contact points 50% of the time and two contact points the remaining 50% of the time, we can move on to test the rotation at high RPM rates. If there is no spark, no heat and the brush will have a long life.

I will update you all as we progress.

NRamaswami

After going through the patent many times and doing a lot of tests I have also understood one thing.

Current goes from Low to High in one of the primaries. In this case Voltage goes from High to Low.

Current goes from High to Low in the corresponding opposite primary. Here Voltage goes from Low to High.

When current is lower, voltage is higher and when current is higher voltage is lower.

This is due to the simple fact that the resistance array is there controlling the flow of Electricity. As resistance to a particular amperage is high, voltage goes up and amperage goes down. opposite is the situation available in the opposite primary.

Now regarding the central coil and the primary coils whether it should be NS-NS-NS or NS-SN-NS or NS-NS-SN or SN-SN-NS or variations I think both of them would work for the structure of the secondary is different for NS-SN-SN type of identical poles opposing each other. I think I should be able to make both of them work but which one would produce the best results I have to test and say.

In my honest opinion the current supplied from the external generator can be AC or DC or Pulsed DC. The arrangement is such that there is always a fluctuating magnetic field between the two primaries. An inductor subjected to a time varying or fluctating magnetic field will produce induced emf is the rule and so it can work even with DC. Again I have to test this concept and post the results.

How did Figuera make the device a self sustaining generator? This question is not clearly answered in the patent and the description avoids it. So it is some thing we need to find out. We are yet to understand that part although I think the buforn patent says that some other wire is wound over the secondary to power the primary input continuously. while theoretically it looks correct I'm not sure why we cannot put a transformer on the secondary and take the output from that transformer secondary and give a feedback to the primary.  This is possible where the input is AC or pulsed DC but not if it is DC. So this confusion still remains.

NRamaswami

Now all the friends here have discussed various things but none has explained what is the Al Origin shown in the Figuera patent. What is the meaning of Al origin in spanish. Can any one clarify on this point please.

shadow119g


NRamaswami

I built a 32 contact commutator that ran at 1800rpm.
I only had one place where it was sparking. I believe it
is better to operate at a slower rpm to reduce sparking.
However I only had the brush contacting two contacts
at a time. I thought of that, but never tried it.

Good luck,

Shadow

NRamaswami

Shadow:

Thank you so much. If you had the brush contacting two points most of the time, then it is 50% or more 3 points and where it was sparking it was touching only one contact point at that point. Better engineering skills. However when you rotate it at 1800 RPM it is difficult for you to catch what is happening. If you find the place at which is sparking and then run the commutator slowly you would find that at that place there is only one contact. I had to spend time to figure it out even after running it deliberately slowly to fix the problems. We will have this sorted out in two days I'm sure now and once there is no spark we can rotate it at any RPM. It is not a commutator that we bought but we hand built this rotary device as you can see. If there is no spark, then probably there is no back emf as Patrick has taught me but I need to test it and verify it. Even now the when the current given is AC to power the + and - points and the rorary disc is made to rotate through a DC motor we have no loss of input and load voltage. But remained at 200 volts. That was very surprising to me. Let me test the entire replication and then post the videos here and let me share what knowledge I gained here.