Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

It's Quite obvious that when someone repeats what they have said before, that person thinks it is of importance and maybe it is worth our time to direct our attention toward the repeated information. things that make you go HMMMM!

Recognising the importance of the A Vector Potential:
The A Vector Potential is significant to understanding Magnetisium. We may or may not be looking at an entire picture of Magnetisium but this is instrumental and experiment supports this important concept.

Richard Feynman:
In the very famous "The Feynman Lectures on Physics (3 Volume Set)" by the famous Richard Feynman, he dedicated an entire lecture and chapter, (Chapter 15 - Vector Potential), to the Vector Potential. Richard Feynman made the Vector Potential standard Science, showing it's importance in Math and explaining where it lay with its brother the component Phi. Listen to the Audio Lecture: Click Here

Dynamic Magnetic Field (B):
An inductor, or solenoid, will take time to charge and reach its maximum magnetic field potential for a given input. The Time Constant is t = L/R. It takes 5 time constants to charge an Inductor to 99.5% of its total capacity. At this point, any input you put into your inductor is not stored in the form of a Magnetic Field, your input just supports the Magnetic Field and is classed as an IR loss, typically lost in the form of heat.

Where: N = North Pole. S = South Pole. A= A Vector Potential.

Please Note: A Permanent Magnet has a Static A Vector Potential, Not Drawn in the above diagram.

The above illustration shows the difference between a static Permanent Magnet and the dynamic charging of an inductor. The reverse is true when the Inductor Discharges.

The Sine of the A Vector Potential:
The sine, or direction of the curl, of the A Vector Potential does not change unless the Magnetic Field Changes Sine or direction. Its classical Right Hand Rule, that applies to the configuration you are working with.
The A Vector Potential is Electrical in Nature:
Richard Feynman has shows in his lectures that this is true, the A Vector Potential is the Magnetic Fields Electrical Component if one were to think of it this way. Tom Bearden has described two types of the A Vector Potential, the known Mathematical Term for the equivalence of B to A is:

EQ: 1

Tom Bearden explains the Time Rate of Change of the A Vector Potential:

EQ: 2

Tom Bearden may well be describing the leading edge of the A Vector Potential as it is dynamically moving. The above leads one to think that the Electric Field surrounds each Magnetic Flux line out in space at the same time that exhibits the same Curl characteristics as we have also seen above.
What is above is as is below:

I personally think we have been looking at this all wrong and this information is down right interesting.

I love this guy  http://www.hyiq.org/Research/Details?Name=A%20Vector%20Potential
see web site for equations.

[Doug1]

 I can prove my points just by asking you if you agree or disagree with some images and statements. Then in essence you will be answering your own questions.
  Like: do you agree with this image as being a electromagnet and the method by which it works as described by every text book you will ever find?

[Doug1]

Would agree or disagree that if I were to place a section of core made from the same material as the magnet core onto the end of the magnet that the magnetic field would be attracted to the additional piece of core and flux lines would go through the extra piece and out of the end of it causing it to stick to the magnet which really only supports the idea that the lines of force have or are traveling through the extra piece making it part of the magnetic circuit there by making it stick together. Agree or not?

[bajac]

I can prove my points just by asking you if you agree or disagree with some images and statements. Then in essence you will be answering your own questions.
  Like: do you agree with this image as being a electromagnet and the method by which it works as described by every text book you will ever find?

Doug, I think I do! I wanted to ask if you see the application of the electromagnet shown in your figure to the transformer shown in the Cook's patent. One interesting thing is that today's closed iron core transformers induce the voltages in one part of the secondary winding only. But the straight iron core electromagnet shown can induce a voltage in all parts (360 degrees) of the turns wound on top of it.

I also wanted to clarify that I am not saying that what Hanon is proposing will not work. As a matter of fact I agree that N-N or S-S could work. Though, less efficient than the one shown by Figuera's patent.

[Doug1]

 If I had two electromagnets one on either side of the extra piece of core and the magnets were turn on and off successively the fields from those electromagnets would traverse the extra piece of core in the middle. Agree or not?

  If the arrangement was the from the left coil north to south and the right coil north to south the same way and they were turned on and off successively  the field going through the extra piece of core would always see the same field orientation. The left side of the extra piece would be south and the right side would be north. So there would no change in the extra piece of core as one magnet is going on the other is going off and so on always keeping the one in the middle the same. Agree or not?