Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[bajac]

It would be helpful if you actually state agree or not.

Doug, I am not sure what to agree or disagree. But, please, go ahead and complete your explanation. It may be easier for me to understand it before I take a time off from this forum.

I feel that I have nothing more to contribute at this time and would like to go into the construction part without interruptions from any kind. posting takes a big chunk out of my time.

[Doug1]

The trick is not a trick at all. Your magnet regardless of what form it takes only works one way. Current travels around making a field around the wire making the core magnetic. There is only an advantage to how you make the current travel around.
  There is but very little current contained in each turn. .1 volts at .01 amps. Treat each turn as its own magnet. Power each turn or group with it's own connection to the supply and a common ground for all the groups.Tuning is in the timing of each group as it comes on or off within a single magnet the supply is very small that is needed. It's easy to over power it.
 

[Doug1]

If you have a core and a winding with a know output ,that is to say it was used for something ells.Say a welder or microwave oven. you have the mains coil which is a number of turns that can handle a number of amps in.It should have no problem giving that back as an output coil. The measure of that coil in terms of turns will have a value per turn in its function with an alternating current coil.
in order to power the coil to its max flux linkage break down the current going to each turn and half that to divide it between two inducers that will be powering it the other way. the reason it does not normally work is because your not paying attention the current per turn in the inducers. You cant use the inducer as a single coil end to end. It has to be made up of a group of windings that are then grouped into a complete coil. So you can get a small amount of power to run the little groups in one inducer which collectively equal half the cycle of the Y coil. Then when you connect to the output and rectify it it will have enough power to run the little groups so they can work together to make the same amount flux as the whole inducer coil would have if you ran it end to end with a higher potential. The other option is the commutator which is harder to me but the com I posted before has four brushes. Its a simplified version. Between the brushes is a small wire of high resistance. The resistance is reduced as more brushes come in contact with the same segment more current can get to the magnet.The wire to the magnet off the last brush or first brush in a set has to able to handle all the current from the brushes in that set in total. The image shows two brushes each set but you can use as many as you feel like fooling with. the use of three segments to the commutator is a very curious and dubious design. pay attention the resulting wave form it would create in a nn or ss situated magnet.

[Doug1]

 The curve of induction in the wave form image sliced up into time may as well be the order of the groups of windings as they turn on and off or incline and decline. The speed is screaming. Each slice of time being a slice of a cycle that happens 50 or 60 times a second. each group of windings with in the total coil controlled to come on or off just like that but at a voltage and amperage equal only to the turns equivalent according to the grouping of turns. Not a lot of power being used at all to make the same effect as wastefully pumping power against the wire resistance of the entire coil and the reluctance of the core.
Now do you still think it is hard? Do ya want to argue some point in particular?
Go back and read your text books and what ever.Not only do they not lie sometimes they hint around to it. Teslas patent A better coil for electromagnets. Bet your gonna look at that a little bit different now.
   

[Doug1]

Do you have a head ache yet? Silvanus and Thompson already wrote up the experiments which support all this in 1891. From then on it just got more diluted to gear it toward an economic engine to produce a lot of money for the few who had the means to construct machines that could be metered so they could charge for it.