Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

hanon

 Hi Marathonman,

The Figuera design did not reverse the polarity. It just changes the strength of the field but without reversing the polarity. In every moment the current has the same direction, therefore there is no reverse of the polarity of the poles. We do not need to reverse the polarity to induce a current. We just need to vary the strength of the magnetic field up and down to create induction.


About the bucking coils: it is just an idea to test. But just for the 1902 patent.  The 1908 patent creates two different fields which move the field back and forth. However, in the patent from 1902 Figuera stated that he just used intermittent current : if we align the poles N-S and one induced coil then we just got something similar to a normal transformer. If we align the same poles facing each other: N-N or S-S then , as both fields has the same strength during the pulses the fields are inducing in opposite directions. Therefore , as I have tested, the induced voltage is almost null with just one coil, because the induction in one part of the coil is contrary to the induction in the other part of the coil.

For me using bucking coil just may have some meaning in the case of the 1902 patent, using pulsed current to excite the electromagnets, and, with same poles facing each other. It is just to collect the induced current in each bucking coil. Later those coils should be connected to add their voltages. If the video from hyiq.org is right then both counter-magnetic field should get compensated in order to cancel the Lenz effect. It is just a matter of testing this configuration and see the results. Just in case it could be useful.

Regards

marathonman

Here is some very good reading...... MUST READ!. i don't remember if this was previously posted but here it is anyways.
Guidelines to Bucking Coils.Lenz's Law Free Power Extraction.

http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidelines%20to%20Bucking%20Coils.pdf

marathonman

Hanon,
Thank you for your information.
i see i made a mistake on my drawing. the coils are raised and lowered together not separate.

marathonman

So does that mean this picture is a possible set up or am i delirious.

hanon

Marathon,

The bucking coils are refering to the induced coils, not to the electromagnets as your previous image shows. Electromagnets must be just oriented to give a certain polarity. Bucking coils are two partnered coils to collect the induced current.

As I told before IMHO this possibility could only have some meaning in a pulsed device as the 1902 patent. The 1908 patent, which has a method to move the fields, do not requiere (IMHO) two bucking coils, but just one coil. Just my thought..