Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 28 Guests are viewing this topic.

a.king21

There is something else to consider. The original patent resembles an old style motor car distributor cap -  except with more contacts. That setup is almost certain to create sparks. Even if the make before break does not create an actual spark the sudden abruptness of the constant switching is bound to create a radiant effect. So we could be looking at a Tesla switch type situation with static mixing on each resistor contact.
Whenever I've tried to recreate an old style patent using modern components the only way I could get near was by rapid switching, in the tens of kilohertz.  My experience has been that the higher the switching rate the lower the voltage and the  cleaner the spike, and the better the transistors could handle the process. However the missing link has always been the static generated by the old style switching process. It could be that by introducing static into the switching process we could emulate the 2008 device.
The question is how to do it without blowing transistors or limiting the spike with ne2 bulbs.
I know that Carlos Benitez in his 1914 to 1918 patents realized the importance of static mixing and mentions this process in one of his patents. Please  understand, I am not criticizing anyone's build here, I am just giving you the benefit of extensive research and experiments into this FE technology.
I almost forgot: A Radiant effect type situation involving a spark - even if quenched- causes oscillations in the MHZ region for each short spark. The oscillations travel through the entire circuit. SO even if your switching rate is 50 hz, each switching contact has a MHZ oscillation in it.

ariovaldo

Quote from: a.king21 on September 30, 2013, 09:17:20 PM
There is something else to consider. The original patent resembles an old style motor car distributor cap -  except with more contacts. That setup is almost certain to create sparks. Even if the make before break does not create an actual spark the sudden abruptness of the constant switching is bound to create a radiant effect. So we could be looking at a Tesla switch type situation with static mixing on each resistor contact.
Whenever I've tried to recreate an old style patent using modern components the only way I could get near was by rapid switching, in the tens of kilohertz.  My experience has been that the higher the switching rate the lower the voltage and the  cleaner the spike, and the better the transistors could handle the process. However the missing link has always been the static generated by the old style switching process. It could be that by introducing static into the switching process we could emulate the 2008 device.
The question is how to do it without blowing transistors or limiting the spike with ne2 bulbs.
I know that Carlos Benitez in his 1914 to 1918 patents realized the importance of static mixing and mentions this process in one of his patents. Please  understand, I am not criticizing anyone's build here, I am just giving you the benefit of extensive research and experiments into this FE technology.
I almost forgot: A Radiant effect type situation involving a spark - even if quenched- causes oscillations in the MHZ region for each short spark. The oscillations travel through the entire circuit. SO even if your switching rate is 50 hz, each hz has a MHZ oscillation in it.
If you take a look in the youtube video that I posted days ago, using the rotary device in a tranformer, the lights just went on when the rotary device got problem and start to spark...do you think the original patent use HV?
I like this line of thinking..


a.king21


Yes Ariovaldo. Great video - actually it's the first time I've seen it.I read up about spark gaps in an old book. If your spark gap  is too small it leads to a dead short. Then the frequency goes down to your switching rate. If your spark is just right your frequency goes into the mhz range.
Voltage: Figuera talks about emulating mains.
So he must be inputting 220 to 240 volts at 50 hz.

Here's some info on spark gaps from an old book on radio telegraph construction.

Schiko

a.king21
QuoteWhenever I've tried to recreate an old style patent using modern components the only way I could get near was by rapid switching, in the tens of kilohertz.  My experience has been that the higher the switching rate the lower the voltage and the  cleaner the spike, and the better the transistors could handle the process. However the missing link has always been the static generated by the old style switching process.

I understand what you mean, but I think today using spark-gap does not make sense to me is spark-gap as a capacitor dielectric stuck and generates many harmonics difficult to control, now if you want a lot of tension just to have enough alternating current and a transformer with secondary large and well done. Look I do not want to finish with the fun of nobody but that's what I think.

a.king21
QuoteThe question is how to do it without blowing transistors or limiting the spike with ne2 bulbs.
I know that Carlos Benitez in his 1914 to 1918 patents realized the importance of static mixing and mentions this process in one of his patents. Please  understand, I am not criticizing anyone's build here, I am just giving you the benefit of extensive research and experiments into this FE technology.
I almost forgot: A Radiant effect type situation involving a spark - even if quenched- causes oscillations in the MHZ region for each short spark. The oscillations travel through the entire circuit. SO even if your switching rate is 50 hz, each hz has a MHZ oscillation in it.

It is true, I agree.
But I really believe in resonance. And some circuits work fine using BEMF damped. This is my way. I see everyone putting diode in parallel with the coil, I think better to use capacitor in parallel with transistor and use part of the wave and reinject in the circuit. As was used in old tv's
Making a mix of coils Figueira, Thane Heins transformer and others may be we can find a way, I don't know ...

After I read it I was curious here ...
http://jnaudin.free.fr/2SGen/images/inductive_conversion.pdf
But that is a topic for another thead.

cheers

forest

Here is strange question if you can help me ?... If there is transformer having one secondary and two separate primaries each one connected to the separate AC power source what parameters should have those currents to combine into 2 times power output on secondary ?