Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Doug1]

Thats not gonna work ,it's been tried before.
To get a self runner you have to get more from someplace enough to cover whats consumed to the load and to cover the losses. What is being manipulated differently that a different reaction would happen? A pound of flux is still a pound of flux. The same flux going round the same way as usual from one pole to another around a closed path.Even with two paths the pound of flux is just allowed to loosely travel the two. It does not increase the number of lines or how they are intercepted. The total is still the same but with maybe a chance for more losses.

[hanon]

Hi all,

I have been thinking about possible winding schemes for patent 30378 (motionless generator, year 1902). I don´t know if I could be right or not, but I have realized a feature which could minimize the Lenz effect over the inducer coils (I think).

The concept is described in the attached picture below. This winding is based on having 2 induced magnetic fields which flow in opposite directions along each inducer coil. If you see the picture, you can note than in each inducer coil there are two induced magnetic fields (one created by that induced coil and one created by the next induced coil). These two induced magnetic field are in oppositon to each other. Therefore the decrease in induced coil strength as consequence of the first induced field is compensated by the increase in that coil strength done by the second magnetic field. Thus, a minimization of the Lenz effect in each inducer coil could be obtained.

Could these proposal be right? Please comment. (Note: Remember that there was another proposal done by Bajac for this patent winding that you can find here: http://www.overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/dlattach/attach/125092/  )

Regards

[Doug1]

Well at least your trying to reduce losses. Thats a good direction. How would you double the flux seen in the induced with out expending more current to do so?Better yet if you could along the way of increasing the flux could cancel the current at maximum operating saturation that would be even better. It would regulate the activivty.

[shadow119g]

Schiko,

I was also thinking about using "tuned" transformers as almost every coil Tesla used was operating on a "harmonic" or resonate frequency. And apparently, Mr. Figeura and Mr. Tesla, if nothing else, knew each other or at least had knowledge of each other.

[hanon]

Hi all,

About the concept that I referred in my last post to achieve two induced magnetic flows in opposition (which cancel each other) I have found some links where this concept is applied. It is called the "F-machine" or "F-Transformer" and it resembles slightly to the Gramme machine :

http://www.alternativkanalen.com/ph-machine.html

As you could note in the next link this device also needs an air gap to avoid the return of the induced field into the primary coil:

http://en.shram.kiev.ua/top/invention/invention2/2.shtml

I have posted these links here in order to discuss if this concept can be applied to Figuera´s  patents. Please post your comments.

Regards