Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

darediamond

Quote from: hanon on April 29, 2016, 05:42:45 PM
All,


Are you sure that you want to follow a felow as the one that send  messages as the copied below. Just for your information.


I just say: read the patents, study them, and later test every possible polarity. But follow the patents !!!

Wao, you are worried with a simple thing even thinking I am trying to be relevant to your gained followers which I am even one of  but with an extreme 'friendly' C A U T I O N !!!

Oh, maybe you think I hate Jews? That can never be.

Well, I fear no criticism either in the open or otherwise so YOU coming out here to paint white as black does not move me at all.

I am not a Racist and I can never be.






darediamond

Marathon, what is special about Part G of Figuera device? It is a MECHANICAL COMMUTATOR that will always needs to be replaced. It is Primarily used to switched the incoming DC voltage from batteries which CF used to power his coils.

This is not theory but practical: you can only at maximum get 100hz from ready-made motor driven commutator. I have tested this myself. 
The CF "Part G" will require an additional feature needed to absorb the High Voltage BEMF Spike to make the commutator run smoothly.
Now tell me, are there no better and simpler alternatives to all the complexities involved in building the Part G today in the name of those excellent Integrated ICs and there assistant in the name of Mosfet?

The slow-motion Part-G can be simply replaced with a Variable Frequency Inverter because as you yourself knows, Inverter Ultimately Possesses  the needed functions and nullifies the cumbersome functions of the Part-G in that it turns smothly DC to AC which is directly being switched on and off by the IC on it board. As for AC being generated by the inverter, no B.E.M.F will be generated by the coils because there frequency will not gets to 0. And because of the way an inverter works, you can easily switch at low voltage and get High Voltage.

No Noice, No Sparks, No wear and tear.

When you use a mechanical means to switch a Coil, it is the voltage that determines what the frequency will be. But with an Inverter, that is not the case because you have the Option of using a POT to adjust the IC output Switching Speed or Frequency at low Voltage as you wish. So you can separately adjust the Frequency to High Level  while maintaining the Voltage at  low level. Imagine that beautiful flexibility which aids Perfect Research and records taking smoothly.



The figuera device can only easily attain overunity without Earth Connection Provided High Frequency in the Khz is applied to the primaries and Lenz is canceled with the correct winding style or direction which Nicola Tesla himself introduced.

Now tell me which Motor in history till date can provide 5kz frequency or 300000rm?
Can you refer to one?
Or do you wanna disprove the fact that when a coil that was formerly draining 3A from a battery at say 100hz is now driven at 2000hz it Amp draw will reduce extremely to Milli amp range?

You do not even understand what I meant that Hanon formerly bowed so your line "because i sent him all of my research plus he has his own and he quit listening to stupid shit. imagine that!" is utter nonsense.

Quote from: marathonman on April 30, 2016, 03:37:43 PM
Building Part G the way figuera Built it as we speak, by the way lets hear your interpretation of part G that you so called nullified. oh my god what a good laugh.  EVERY ONE can be at ease now that  darediamond has nullified part G.
you offer nothing just like Rswami does, just a lot of hot air that NO BODY follows that has any common sense.

My final device is almost complete how about yours, and i did say "FINAL".

Hanon i wouldn't follow the nut case if you paid me to. i think i'll stay my path."the right one"

and by the way Hanon didn't bow, he came to his senses, because i sent him all of my research plus he has his own and he quit listening to stupid shit.
imagine that !

marathonman

Does retardism run in your family.
Study part G if you can then reply.
other than that good luck with your Figuera  journey. with the path you going you'll need all the luck you can get.

oh by the way i am pursuing both entities of part G moving and NON MOVING and your knowledge of pat G is pathetic..... trust me you don't know shit about part G, must follow Einstein.

NRamaswami

Not clear to me what the confusion is all about.

We have two groups..

One Group wants do the Figuera device as described in the patent.

Other group wants to follow the Figuera Principle described in the patent due to the sparking problem in the rotary device Part G.

Part G as interpreted and described by Marathonman seems to be slightly different and he appears to have done research in to old tech and old components.

Now my understanding of Figuera Patent is simple.

We need to rotate the magnet inside a dynamo. Because it is difficult the magnet is lower powered. If the magnet is made very powerful like the Neodymium magnets it will be very difficult to rotate it. This is why we have Low RPM Neo Magnet alternators.

Now if we do not rotate the core but give it pulsed DC or interruptted DC or AC the core becomes an electromagnet., The surrounding coils are also magnetised and they also produce power like in transformers. The advantage of this method is you can wind as many secondaries as you want and connect them in series. Primary can be made up of thin wires and secondary can be made up of thick wires.

Figuera has made another change. He has connected the cores directly. So there is no leakage of magnetic flux between the primary and secondary. I have seen that secondaries produce higher output than input only when the primary core is saturated. I have used AC only and not pulsed DC or interrupted DC. When using AC only if the secondaries merge higher output comes. Invariably this did not happen to me at lower magnetic field strengths but only at saturation. This is not considered safe and as I have personally experienced it is also not safe.

But it is correct that this enables us to use higher frequencies than what is normally given to primary. Higher the Frequency lower is the amperage.

The main problem with the Part G as I and Mr. Dare Diamond have built is the sparking problem. He describes a method of quenching sparks using HV capacitors but I do not have that kind of knowledge. But higher frequencies normally draw only lower amps and higher frquencies must also have higher voltage to draw some minimum amount of amps. Otherwise the magnetic field created is very low. Whether this will work in pulsed DC is something that I have not tested and so I cannot say any thing on it. Increasing the Frequencies reduces the amp drawn is some thing I can attest to for high frequency devices that I have built work for a long time even when using a 9 volt battery. They draw very littel amps.  They produce a low magnetism which is suitable for the human body. If we are going to use an electromagnet I would think High Frequency must be accompanied by High Votlage to draw reasonable amps.

Marathonman seems to have found an old record for Part G and seems to be building it. We need to wait and see how that device functions. His description of the device and its function is different. it is possible that he has got a Golden egg but he has not put up any device so far.

It is possible that if I had used pulsed DC the secondaries would have merged. The problem is at 220 volts a Full Wave Diode bridge Rectifier when connected to the Electromagnet draws too much of an amperage that the office circuit breaker cuts in. Therefore I need to arrange for high resistance coils to be made and then put in between the Diode Bridge Rectifier and the primary coils and then see if at lower magnetic field strength th secondaries merge. If they do merge and increase the voltage of the secondary at lower magnetic field strength, I would have built a device in accordance with the principles of Figuera but not the device as described by Figuera. The problem will be one of sustaining the device on its own and then inverting the pulsed DC to AC.

I think all of us have done very significant work here. There is no reason to fight whether Pure Figuera device alone should be built or following his principles are enough. Focus on Research and avoid fraternal fighting.

At the end all of us are trying to do something good and there is no need to fight among us. I do not have high resistance coils and I need to organize them. But once I do it it will be a simple any one can do device for there is no complexity.  Let me see if I can organize it.

No infighting and what you are saying is all correct. Marathonman would deserve our congrats if he can show the part G device as he describes because none of us including Hanon who did not even attempt it were able to built it. It is full of sparks for almost 6 to 8 inches when rotated at 1000 RPM. That is almost 450,000+ volts. I did not know what to do. Ultimately the device I produced had a frequency of 1 Hz to 2 Hz and still had a spark at a place.

DC commutators very rugged are built here but they are not similar to What Figuera has described. They appear to create a very mild spark which the carbon brush seems to be capable of handling. But these are ready made commutators and to order a single rotary device as Figuera has done will cost so much. it is possible that marathonman has done it and we will have to wait and see.

For those who cannot do it, I do not see what is wrong in following a simplified approach that they are capable of doing it. So without any infighting try to make further progress.




marathonman

Part G can be made two ways, MOVING and NON_MOVING. both will work and both i am building and will share my results when done.
as i have described part G's function in earlier post i will not bore you with the same details but i again stress the importance of part G. it has multiple roles and needs to be in the system.
i have studied part G's magnetic field interactions, rotation and it's interactions with the declining electromagnet and found its extremely vital roles are not replaceable with modern day ic's except the switching on the high side can be done with transistors if one wanted to as this will still mimic the rotation of the original Part G and not interfere with the declining electromagnets feeding part G as it is shoved out of the secondary core into it's own core.

i have also concluded the the winding of the primaries are very important and can not be wound with the currant entering the back of the coil because it will be nulified from the declining electromagnet being shoved out of the secondary into it's own core. as this is done the currant in the declining electromagnet will travel out of the back of the coil interfering with the original currant powering the coil in the first place.
so the primaries have to be wound with the currant entering the front of the coil and exiting the rear so when the primary is shoved out of the secondary the currant will travel the same direction as the original currant feeding part G in the process.
this could quite possibly be Hanon's problem with his device but i don't know for sure as i did not wind them.

the two pics i have posted of course will not have as many windings on them as shown because the reluctance will be to great and the currant will be to low. as Doug has stated the currant only has to be taken down just enough in the declining electromagnet to clear the secondary as it is being shoved out from the secondary from the inclining electromagnet. the pics are one like Figuera did and the other with switches (Transistors). the arrows are the actual currant flow.

this is the reason everyone is having so much trouble with NN because the two electromagnets HAVE to have constant pressure between them or INDUCTION falls off dramatically. if they are not in unison you will get very low output.