Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

By the time the true direction of electron flow was discovered, the nomenclature of "positive" and "negative" had already been so well established in the scientific community that no effort was made to change it, although calling electrons "positive" would make more sense in referring to "excess" charge. You see, the terms "positive" and "negative" are human inventions, and as such have no absolute meaning beyond our own conventions of language and scientific description. Franklin could have just as easily referred to a surplus of charge as "black" and a deficiency as "white," in which case scientists would speak of electrons having a "white" charge (assuming the same incorrect conjecture of charge position between wax and wool).

He also discovered that only one of these charges can move while the other is stationary. He didn't know which so he made a guess and said the current flow from + to - which he had a 50/50 chance and got it wrong. Then in 1900, J.J. Thompson discovered an electron and proved electrons are negative and that they flow to a positive charge. In reality, - flow to + Physicists use: - flow to + Engineeers use: + flow to -.

Why engineers use a wrong assumption? Becuase during 1900's they didn't change their textbooks. So we are stuck with a wrong convection current.

However, because we tend to associate the word "positive" with "surplus" and "negative" with "deficiency," the standard label for electron charge does seem backward. Because of this, many engineers decided to retain the old concept of electricity with "positive" referring to a surplus of charge, and label charge flow (current) accordingly. This became known as conventional flow notation:

yes i do agree that the pressure flow is from - to + but i personally do not believe there is such a thing as positive or negative charged particles anywhere in our universe as i do believe in a few things Ken Wheeler says and that is eather pressure modalities. the so called negative is actual charging to a higher pressure potential (counter space) creating heat and positive is radiative discharging (Space) to less pressure which is radiated to cold in an never ending cycle.

Just something to consider and keep fresh on your mind is the direction the actual currant is flowing, the spin direction of the rotating fields and the pressure between the primaries required for a specific output.

Marathonman

[marathonman]

If an inductor is designed so that any one of these factors may be varied at will, its inductance will correspondingly vary. Variable inductors are usually made by providing a way to vary the number of wire turns in use at any given time, or by varying the core material or both.

that is exactly what Figuera did in his part G by varying the amount of winding's magnetically linking and unlinking to the system he added or subtracted core material and winding's as the brush rotated keeping them separate with N><N fields at the brush. by changing these two parameters increased and decreased the size of the inductor this allowed him to vary each inductor on each side of the brush separately while remaining in complete unity and pressure between the primaries is maintained at all times.

Marathonman

[marathonman]

Stefan Hartmann ( Admin)
When are you going to release the graphs with my last post. the graphs are for the understanding of the description of the Figuera device.
it has been well over a year since i wad moderated and the trolls have since moved on.
Please reevaluate the situation.
this message is for you and not the thread.

Marathonman

[marathonman]

I see someone is really one his toes.

Continuing on the common sense theme part G will become the power supply of the device after the initial start of the device then the power supply can be taken away.  every half rotation of part G it stores and releases energy into the system each half of part G almost acting independent but feeding each other. when one side is storing energy in the form of a magnetic field the other side is releasing energy into the system from it's magnetic field. in the next cycle the reverse is true, the previous rising side will be releasing energy into the system and the reducing side will be storing into the magnetic field.

as the magnetic field is released into the system from the reducing side of part G the reducing primaries magnetic field is reduced also releasing that part of the reduced magnetic field into part G. both sources of potential are combined causing a forward biasing of part G similar to a mag amp. this amplification off sets the rising side of part G potential drop as any inductor when currant is rising will store into it's magnetic field causing a potential drop on that side of part G.  both sources of potential combines off setting this potential drop causing an amplification to the rising electromagnet boosting it's output. these magnetic fields are also used in the manipulation of the currant. with each half rotation of the brush each side of the brush will act as independent inductors with the length of the inductor changing with the brush movement adding or subtracting winding's that magnetically link or unlink to that half of the inductor causing a linear rise and fall of currant.

once the fields are up to working conditions the currant draw of the device will drop as per Sparky Sweet and the only power needed will be the replacement of the IR2 losses and the rising electromagnet to full potential which is small since the primary is only reduce to just clear the secondary then back to full potential.

just like a standard generator a small portion of the output is fed to it's exciting field to replace the losses which are inherent in all man's devices as nothing is 100%. just like a standard generator once the magnetic fields are up to working conditions the currant draw is reduced to that of just the IR2 losses to maintain the fields.

the inducing side and the induced side are actually separate system and the only power used from the inducing side to the induced is to polarize the secondaries. once the secondaries currant starts flowing they part ways and almost act independent of each other.  when the currant flows in the output according to the Lenz law an opposing field will form opposing the original currant flow and this opposite field is what is pushed side to side from the primaries across the circular Electric field that is formed around the secondaries from the actions of the primaries.

in a standard generator the exciting fields are on all the time and as the rotor rotates through the magnetic fields it encounters different strengths of magnetic field and the closer it gets to the exciters the stronger the field gets thus the farther it gets from the exciters the weaker the field gets. so in the FIguera device since the electromagnets are stationary with no moving parts in order to get the rise and fall of magnetic field strength he had to raise and lower the currant to the primary electromagnets to mimic this process and that is where part G comes into play inducing an orderly rise and fall of currant in a linear fashion.

all said actions of a standard generator and the Figuera stationary generator are the laws of induction set forth by Faraday and violate not one as any and i mean any increase of decrease in magnetic field strength will cause an EMF in the output and the Figuera device does just that.

It is quite obvious no one listened to Mr Doug, imagine that.




Marathonman

[marathonman]

In my research the reason i brought in William Hooper and associated his work with Figuera was his table top experiment dealing with motional electric fields.

In my research in magnetism i found that two opposing magnetic fields can not occupy the same time space domain at the same time. it has to be one or the other not both. when two opposing magnetic fields are forced together the magnetic field line are highly compressed but still remain separate, if these two fields remain separate then how in the world did Figuera get such an amazing output from such a small crude device.

Two words...... "ELECTRIC FIELD"

The Motional Electric Fields are not like the opposing magnetic fields. they are the same coin but the other side acting differently in respects to time space domain. even though the magnetic fields remain separate the Motional Electric Fields do not and are positive and additive.

Figuera in his amazing research found out that by increasing the currant in one opposing electromagnet and decreasing the other at the same time both electromagnets Motional Electric Fields were both positive and additive as both were in the same direction giving him double the output as one electromagnet alone. all that is required to keep this action at a constant is maintaining the magnetic field pressure between the primary electromagnets when one is reduced and the other increased allowing the Motional Electric Fields to remain in coherency....ie in phase.

the magnet tests that were performed are the exact same actions of the Figuera electromagnets. as the first magnet through the coil it's magnetic field will act as it is being reduced and the second approaching the coil will act as if it were being increased. with the opposing magnetic fields compressed  just like the electromagnets in which is directly correlated to the to the amount of output you will get the magnets create the Motional Electric Fields just the same as the Figuera device. both magnets electric fields are positive and additive as both are in the same direction.

The Figuera device is intriguing, fascinating and has captivated all my attention.

Marathonman