Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

That's really hilarious given the fact that 6 months ago you PM'ed me that i was completely right and you were wrong. maybe i should post that PM as i did save it to let the world know what type of a person you are.

the Figuera device is NOT a DON Smith energy resonant device and even states in the patent. he observed a dynamo and made it stationary that is it. he used two opposing electromagnets to mimic the high intensity field of a regular dynamo then reducing one and raising the other to induce movement into the secondary.
if you think those crasy thoughts why not get your own thread and not ruin or confuse this thread.

good day and good luck, you'll need all you can get.

PS, the opposing primary electromagnet DO NOT negate Lenz effect, sorry you are incorrect again. as a mater of fact Figuera uses it to his advantage and you would of known this if you would of done proper research not fly by week end thing.

Facts are Facts and mine are backed up with real Physics and almost 6 years of bench work.

Marathonman

[darediamond]

Marathonman, calm down.
You do need not to be insultive.
No one is taking your thread away from you.
Figuera Gen can be upgraded to Pure Motionless Over unity Electromagnetic generator that is my sermon and will always be!
Instead of the mechanical inverter in Figuera Gen, we can apply Motionless Inverter now which encompasses Spider I.C and MOSFETs.
Instead of applying less than 100hz which the motor in the said mechanical inverter is producing, we can now use high frequency.
Instead of ordinary Induction, Resonant Induction can be applied.
Instead of array of Electromagnets, just 1 set can be used and yet get tremendous output and even loop the set-up utilising Zero Voltage Re-back e.m.f lead acid battery charger.

I believe you are Positively dynamic only that you are seeing things differently.

[marathonman]

This is a quote from Aubrey Scoons that replicated Royal Rife's work;

"DON'T BE FOOLED!
Complexity does not equal credibility. Just the opposite in fact. Anyone who has genuine insight will be able to explain to you in simple language exactly what they mean and you will then be able to verify it with known scientific fact. If they can't.....well, what do you think?"
This is why i choose to explain things in detail but at a level everyone can understand. it is usually the troll or the Ney Sayers that try to use words that you can't understand or even dishonest tactics to discredit/belittle you.

I will leave it to the readers to decide for your selves.

Marathonman

[marathonman]

Another very highly overlooked FACT.
in 1908 the patent offices required you "the patentee" to have a small working device to display the working principals of your patent. what this means is the patent office required you to have a working device unlike today you could patent a French fart if it smells different. no offence to the French.

Figuera had a working device (1902) patents that he sold to the bankers. his 1908 patent was more than likely the patent and working device that powered his home in Barcelona Spain at the time of his death. it was recorded that it powered his house lights, a 20 HP motor and the street light around his house.
So i could really care less if anyone says that this device can't work because i know better. if you dig hard enough the truth will eventually come to light.
simple test at your home will set the truth free.

Marathonman

[marathonman]

So basically what part G does as the brush rotates is change the ratio of magnetic field to the amount of currant.

this fact is the effects of an inductor taken from a static device that opposes the currant for a short time then rising to a steady state. so in order to get the same reaction of the inductor but at a continuous basis we need to take it from a static device to an active device.

so lets talk about this since a few are still having a little trouble with this statement.

Quote from Wikipedia;
"Any alteration to a circuit which increases the flux (total magnetic field) through the circuit produced by a given current increases the inductance, because inductance is also equal to the ratio of magnetic flux to current."

now would you not think that as the brush rotates around the core is not an "Alteration" of the circuit. ? and would it not change the magnetic field increasing or decreasing which is the ratio of magnetic field to currant, why sure in hell it is.

this is why the part G inductor changes the currant as the brush rotates around the core. it changes the ratio of magnetic field per the amount of currant increasing and decreasing the size of the inductor on both sides of the brush separated by two North><North magnetic fields allowing them to remain completely separate but in complete unison.

the currant running through the wire causes a magnetic field around the wires and it is this magnetic field that strikes the winding next to it that causes the reverse EMF to form that opposes the original currant flow. the more winding's that magnetically link to the circuit the more opposition to currant flow. thus the reverse is true, the less winding's that magnetically link to the system the less opposition to currant flow.
So as the brush rotates around the core making contact with more than one contact at a time in a make before break scenario, the winding's are magnetically linking or unlinking to each side of the circuit on each side of the positive brush where the North North fields keep them separate. allowing them to increase or decrease in size thus changing the ratio of magnetic field to currant thus changing the currant on a complete orderly basis.

another fact is while the inductor on one side of the brush is increasing in size it is releasing the reduced potential into the system feeding the increasing primary electromagnet while the side of the inductor that is reducing in size is storing into the magnetic field to feed the next rising primary electromagnet.



Marathonman