Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

There is a serious question i have to ask the people that still think part G is resistors.

How do you counteract the potential drop to the primaries as they are increasing in strength to sweep the field across the secondary knowing that any rise in magnetic potential will cause a potential drop across the conductor. please tell me how you can do this with an F-in resistor. please i would love to hear the absurdities come fourth as i sure need a good laugh about now.

any clue as to what the heck i am talking about or are you just going to blab out the first thing that short circuits in that brain of yours.??

The entire reason Figuera used an INDUCTOR is the fact that an INDUCTOR can store and release potential at the right time counteracting the potential drop to the rising electromagnet and even amplify the signal in the process.
Not only that the stored magnetic field can even reduce the currant flowing through the circuit in an orderly linear fashion.

Now !, try that with your stupid resistor array or resistors or Barbeque heater coil or what ever your broke brain comes up with that causes resistance.
there seams to be a total lack of common sense on this website just like that of the Entergetic forum which is why those threads are in the waste basket.
I would really like to know if there is anyone on this site that has any common sense about them that really truly wants to learn how to build the Figuera device or is this all that i am talking to is brain dead trolls.

If there is any common sense out there please let me know that my time here is not a total waste of time.


Marathonman

[Belfior]

Well it kinda depends what you consider a waste of time? If you just want to rant with your Rage'O'Matic lever all the way to 11 and vent your frustration, then I guess it is time well spent.

If you actually want to convey some information to people, then I would suggest dropping the lever to lets say 8 and maybe not call everybody a stupid fuck?

I personally do not read any post with more than 3 words in full CAPS. Raving with CAPS just makes you look like you are 2 months away from a permanent mental hospital trip. Also if you are hostile than all you achieve is make people fight back and not take in the information you have. Just look at Joseph Westley Newman's latest videos and that is what they have shrunk this man into. A bitter old man that takes everybody as the enemy and just rages on. What a great way to make stop taking him seriously

So next time somebody says "Now I got my resistors placed in the G part. Took me all night" then just post "there are no resistors in part G" and go scream in thew back yard

[marathonman]

I did not call anyone that name but if the shoe fits wear it, that's entirely up to you.

I personally don't care if anyone here builds this device at all. this is one of the worst sites on the net for trying to convey information and it seems all people do is post blindly without reading and understanding the material presented or even doing the actual research.
it would seem after five year people would would pull their heads out of their backside but i guess reality just came crashing down as it seems i have been talking to bobble heads with the information bouncing off of the heads like that of a pinball machine.

I have many years of bench work that is backed by real Physics and Science not babbling baby blunder that seems to be the norm on this site. then on top off all the BS there is people that purposely disrupt the flow of information presented whether they are paid or not that have no desire to either learn or help the spread of the information.
if you or anyone on this site do not believe that free energy is possible then what the hell are you doing on this site in the first place other than disrupting the transfer of information.

everything was fine until the brain dead trolls came out of the wood works because to much real information about the Figuera device was presented.
I post on other sites aside from this one and this site is the only one that attracts the flies in which i have no patience for stupidity or blind assumption.
if people don't want to learn that is their prerogative  but why in hell do they have to disrupt threads being completely disrespectful to the people that actually want to learn.
see i can post without caps to your cap sensitive self. that last post i posted the only cap was INDUCTOR so what is your problem as i don't have one and don't need yours.
If someone tells you "YOUR WRONG" and you got angry.. you have an ego problem.. especially if the information presented is backed by Physics and science and can not be disputed.

have a good day.

Marathonman

[NRamaswami]

I have experimented with Figuera device and Hubbard device and done a lot of variations.

What appears to me is this.

Notwithstanding the abusive language employed by Mr. Marathonman there is indeed some correctness in what he is saying.

If we look closely at Figuera patent, the drawings are not accurate. They are quite deceptive.

If you look at the drawings of Howard Johnson magnetic motor patent they are very deceptive. The principle is valid and a device made as per Howard Johnson drawings would work.

The principle taught by Figuera is valid. Drawing is deceptive. Even if some one were to steal the data they would not be able to replicate it. This is how these very intelligent people have drawn their drawings.

The Figuera principle is that if you some how oscillate the magnetic field the coils surrounding the oscillated field would get induced electricity. But for this to be done easily we need permanent magnets and not soft iron core.

For this the best thing is not soft iron core that I used but a sort of permanent magnet core. If the permanent magnet is oscillated then the electricity must be induced in the coils surrounding the core.

I have checked the possibility of using NS-NS-NS poles when the output is very high as shown in the drawings of Figuera Patent ( there is always the mystery why there is a space between the primary coils and secondary and how it can be present either in opposite poles facing each other or identical poles facing each other- Gap cannot be present in either case) and identical poles when the output is minimum.

When the core is a common one the identical pole arrangement cancels out the magnetic field. Therefore the output is either nil or we need very large magnetic cores to get a minimum output.  May be about 5 to 8% of input. When opposite poles are used the output is very good but not COP>1 as shown in the Figuera patent drawing.

If we look carefully at Figuera Patent the drawings are very deceptive.

I do not agree that resistor array is not required. The resistor array is present in the coils of the primaries whether there is one added or not.

The primary coils can be easily arranged to make first core to be made up of thickest wire, second somewhat lesser in thickness and so on when a minimum amount of current would flow through the last core. We can put the same type of coils in the reverse order in the other primaries to make the same effect so that the secondary would be exposed to different current on either side always.

You do not need a part G to be present today. We need to oscillate the direct current from a battery for this arrangement to work and this is where the Part G  was used in Figueras times but today with Transistors it is a much easier task and Part G is not required. We would only need to use a 555 transistor to be able to oscillate the DC current going through a Mosfet. 

This arrangement will obviate the need for a resistor array and Part G as shown in drawings. But the variation of current must be present.

Again looking carefully at the drawings we do not find any core in the drawings of BuForn drawings in the Primaries. The core is present only in the secondaries.

I suspect that it is a permanent magnet core and the primaries are Air core. An iron core offers resistance to current and so would draw lesser current than an air core.  Even if there is no iron in the primaries the coils in the air core would make the induction to be present in the secondary permanent magnet core in the center and they have to oscillate the permanent magnet in the center only.  This would enable the gap to be present whether we use the identical pole arrangement or opposite pole arrangement.

If the permanent magnet core is present in the center irrespective of whether the poles used are opposite poles or identical poles the oscillation of the magnetic field would be present. When the coils on the secondary are subjected to time varying magnetic field they must get induced electricity. In my experience higher the voltage of the primary higher is the voltage of the secondary. Greater the number of turns of the secondary higher is the voltage. Higher the voltage of the secondary and greater the magnetic field strength higher is the amperage of secondary.  These are practical hands on observations.

Unfortunately when I started doing this some one in this thread indicated that I would get in to some problems and I'm doing this without realising it. The words turned out to be prophetic and I have avoided doing any thing now.

If other people are feeling distraught and struggling they must have done a lot of experimentation themselves. Somehow this is not a good field for health and finances. They must be actually complimented for their hard work. Unfortunately not all persons are succesful in spite of hard work. Figuera himself passed away after a short time of this device.

I have experimented with multiple versions of Figuera and Hubbard circuits and today I do not understand why some variations which should not work actually produce results.

Unfortunately my health has also come down. So I have no further interest in this field.  I'm a physical wreck today. Probably this is not a good field. So I'm not doing any thing further.  One of my relatives who did experiments with high energy fields died out of Lung cancer many years back. Another friend is diagnosed with early Cancer. I myself have got Asthma and TB and nervous problems and I have gone through a heart problem and a mild stroke problem. All within the last five years. Talking badly about people who are psychologically down after a lot of hard work is very easy. This needs to be avoided.

[ramset]

HHMMmm

maybe you could start a topic for this .....health concerns
Not to clog this mans topic

I have often wondered....?

and there are other things we could include from research with Wifi and cell phones etc
etc

?

there is a health topic from Gary Vesperman somewhere [OLD Time OU man with many good contributions.


I Must say I did talk about this many times with researchers
and they always pointed to Tesla and the crazy things he did with his work

?

sorry for off topic [will try and find Gary's topic,  he sent new info and I have been meaning to update

respectfully
Chet K