Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[hartiberlin]

User marathonman
is moderated until he will not continue to start flame wars and do death threats...
That is not accepted over here.

Please post an appology and I will unmoderate you again. Please try to be more "professional" and do a
factual discussion and not shouting at each other. PLEEEAASE..
Many thanks for understanding.

Regards, Stefan.P.S: I also removed his first name over here from the posting, if his last name was also posted, let me know and I will remove it too...

[seaad]

@ hartiberlin
Thanks for your help!

  Regards Arne

[seaad]

 The development of the Figuera principles and some testings can be followed here also:

http://www.aboveunity.com/thread/clemente-figuera/?order=all#comment-113491cc-bb60-469a-9725-a88f0122b9ec

https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipP4nEyQHK1jTTNgpmOkkh5Oche8_8l7dvCAsBxWJQnPEx5QtSjdBVqdaFxbmOLz1w?key=YnZuaGFWekI2TlIyaURpSUpmZ25GTk1EWFQ4VHJ3

[bajac]

Hi guys!
Nice to see that you have not given up on building a successful FE prototype. I have been away for a really long time but I have always hoped to come back to do more research in this field.

During my time off I got sick for some time but I have also been building prototypes for other devices. The exercise has given me some self-taught training in the art of manufacturing. I am attaching photos of an LED lighting device that I built to test a concept. It was a success and I am hoping to make some money out of it.

Coming back to the subject of this thread, my experience with these devices taught me that the air gap is a huge challenge when trying to replicate these devices. Once an air gap is made to a closed magnetic path of an iron core, the intensity of the magnetic field can drop by a factor of one over a million. In my opinion, this drop in the magnetic field is what makes the duplication of these devices so difficult. In my last trial, I used a primary coil with about 1,800 turns, but when tested, it was inducing no more than 20 volts. For my second trial, I am thinking of building primary coils using a very thin wire for the primary coil and many more turns as possible, I would say more than 5,000 turns.

I wish you good luck with your experiments!

Sincerely,
Bajac

[Sam6]

Bajac -

It's good to see you back in action. I always appreciated your insights.

So far everyone I have read about complains about low output. If they are not using the original Figuera configuration or one that gives a low reluctance flux path, they can't get an adequate output. Those with facing like pole electromagnets on either side of an output coil cannot get an adequate output because the flux path between the output core and the opposite pole of the exciter core is in air. Rowland's law states "flux = magneto motive force / reluctance".  As you stated, reluctance of air is huge compared to that of iron, so the flux path's total reluctance is too large for that configuration to have a significant output.

I have also been absent on the forum for several months, but have pursued the Figuera generator principle using a slightly different configuration. Instead of using two magnetic circuits in which the output is a common member, I elected to use a rectangular flux circuit with two exciters (inducers) on opposite legs of the rectangle with like poles facing each other, separated with an output coil between each exciter on the other legs. That way both poles of each magnet were used so the output could be doubled. The amp-turns of one exciter coil are adequate to drive the required flux through the entire flux path, including mitered joint air gaps, if the other exciter is at a minimum of zero output at that point in the waveform.

At this point I have the electronics that excite the inducers working correctly. That portion consists of a main power supply that feeds two PWM power supplies that power the inducers. These adjustable PWM supplies respond to an electronic board that provides two 50 or 60 Hz 16 bit digital sine waves 180 degrees out of phase. The board also provides other signals that permit using other boards to create 3 phase devices. Those boards are designed, but will not be built until the first unit is functional.

Proof of principal experiments demonstrate that this approach allows 3 small coils to produce a sine output using PWM excitation on 2 of them when the unit is in run mode, and that the resultant field from the opposing pole coils can be statically controlled to 8 different positions as it is stepped manually across the length of the output coil when it is in step mode. Max and min adjustments are provided to control the excursion of the resultant field.

My approach does not have the "Part G", but calculations show a 23 KW unit can produce a COP around 100. They are based on the principles outlined in the book, Elementary Dynamo Design written by Benison Hurd in 1908, and the properties of M4 grain oriented electrical steel product literature by AK Steel and Allegeheney Ludlum Steel.

At this point, I am ready to make a 23 KW unit. This device will be about 22x35x8.5 inches, and have a 6.5 inch square core with forces on the order of 6000 pounds at each joint. It will weigh about 1150 pounds - not including the support frame, control and breaker cabinets, or protective screen / housing. Unfortunately, making a smaller unit does not cost appreciably less.

I have previously posted documents describing this device. They appeared on page 289. Since then, I have improved the spreadsheet and corrected minor errors. The original spreadsheet did not warn when entered parameters allowed the output coil to be too large. This allowed the core to be too small, and the back amp-turns to be above the acceptable limit.

If anyone finds errors in these documents,  would appreciate hearing from you.

Thanks,
sam6