Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[kolbacict]

It is interesting.You all build your devices using Breadboards and terminals and clamps.
Am I the only one so far soldering the old fashioned way?

[bistander]

IMIGHTKNOW,
More than one member here thinks you are the person a.k.a. marathonman. Are you?
bi

...
I know MM, I have one of his electronic boards he designed to electronically switch part G. Simply flawless design to nanosecond frequency switching with only 38 lines of code. Can you do better bi?

Can you answer my question first? Or just pat your own back?

I do find it interesting that some are obsessed with a few watts used for excitation control of a free energy production process. So what? Don't you get replacement watts for free?
Set priority. Solve main issue first. Demonstrate grasp of energy production. Then details like thermal management and cost.
By definition it is impossible to obtain OU by increasing efficiency. A different approach is needed. So a few watts loss is just a distraction.
bi

[IMIGHTKNOW]

You have no clue as to the Figuera device and probably never will. Keep on tainting threads your good at it. I was warned about your mouth prior to coming here. Good day discussion over with your kind.

Cadman;

I think I understand what you are saying now, please correct if wrong. Your proposing to switch coil count as the brush rotates having more coils active on the high side and less on the low side then vise verse.? If that is the case then where does the resistance come into play knowing that resistors burn off potential as heat yet inductance stores and release from magnetic field.?
From just reading Doug1 and the patents the primaries are wound specifically as electromagnets so current control has to come from somewhere.

[bistander]

Are you the person who called himself marathonman?

[Cadman]

You have no clue as to the Figuera device and probably never will. Keep on tainting threads your good at it. I was warned about your mouth prior to coming here. Good day discussion over with your kind.

Cadman;

I think I understand what you are saying now, please correct if wrong. Your proposing to switch coil count as the brush rotates having more coils active on the high side and less on the low side then vise verse.? If that is the case then where does the resistance come into play knowing that resistors burn off potential as heat yet inductance stores and release from magnetic field.?
From just reading Doug1 and the patents the primaries are wound specifically as electromagnets so current control has to come from somewhere.

Let me try to make my thinking on that particular idea clear to you. You know what device I built years ago, it convinced me that was the wrong path because it really didn't maintain a constant strength magnetic field or provide any movement in the field. It acted kind of like PWM.

I ask myself, how did the old dynamos work? They created constant strength magnetic fields (ignoring load regulation for now) and then moved a specific number of wires or bars across and through those fields at a specific rate. That's as simple as I can state it. Just placing stationary wires in a fluctuating magnetic field is not the same thing. I have been looking for a way to add real movement to the field ever since.

Even though I don't think the following is the way to go, Hanon's video did show better output with like fields facing but he still had physical movement. Physical movement could be simulated with an exciter coil made of pie segments, of for instance 10 segments, 5 consecutive magnetized at all times. While one end segment is being added the opposite end segment being dropped, adding and dropping until the 5 arrive at an end. When the 5 magnetized segments arrive at one end of the coil a segment is added at the other end of the 5 while the last added is dropped and the 5 'move' toward the opposite end of that 10 segment exciter. Back and forth. That's one exciter. The opposite exciter is being operated in the same manner so both their fields are moving left then both moving right in unison. The consequent middle pole would be constant strength and it's location would be moving left and right through the excited windings core.

That would be one way to provide a constant strength 'moving' field at the intersection of the opposing exciters.

Resistors? What resistors? Those were just drawn to help demonstrate the concept. One of the patents even says so. The exciter coils themselves are resistors for that matter. Each 'pie' in the above example could be considered a separate resistor. Saying one exciter becomes full while the opposite becomes empty could also describe one the above exciters. One pie becomes full while the pie at the other end empties. Point being, don't get hung up on those patent drawings as being the actual device.