Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 48 Guests are viewing this topic.

NRamaswami

I'm sorry I never said or indicated any one here is not intelligent. Simply calculate the force needed to keep two 50 kg electromagnets of 2 T with their opposite poles facing each other and without touching them with an air gap between them. And then visualize if my mini lab could have the facility to have such powerful devices. Is it possible or practical..Your motors and pumps are not electromagnets with opposing poles kept not to touch.

You clearly show that you have not used the forces of magnetic attraction as the magnets just instantly move towards each other and attach themselves. To keep two Neodymium magnets that have about 0.6 Tesla strength and which will weigh about 100 gms each not to touch each other when their opposite poles face each other with our bare hands or even to separate them from one another is difficult. It is done but we need to do it carefully as otherwise it will hurt the fingers.  When that is the case two electromagnets weighing 50 kg with their opposite poles not to touch..., what will be the force needed. Cranes will be needed to do that to the electromagnets. See if I would have them in my place..

Please see that I'm saying that is laughed at like Magic etc.. by others.

I must have some guts to report this kind of results. I must have some guts to say some thing that would be contrary to what would be expected. I must have done the experiments and then I'm posting the results here, a place of posters acknowledged with an open mind.  And I must have some guts to show simple, a very simple device that uses both the forces of magnetic attraction and repulsion and combine them which is not done today.

Granted that I have no theoretical background and it is openly acknowledged by me. But Figuera was a Professor of reputaton. What I have done is to de-codify his careful words and modified the whole set up, deliberately made complicated by him to hide the simplicity of the thing and made a simple device that can be replicated easily by any one..None of you have done that decodification..And I have disclosed the simple device. Read his interview posted by Hanon that the whole thing is very simple.

Rather than making assumptions or presumptions, do the simple to replicate experiment. If you do not have the facility or if you do want me to post the videos when it is replicated here, I would post it. When some friend demanded pictures of disassembled set up in took the photos and posted it as it is in a moment.

I look at other members here with respect. No disrepect is never intended or given. But please do not assume things. If you calculate the force needed to keep 2 telsa electromagnets with their opposite poles not to touch each other, you would know what is the force needed to do it given your mechanical background. Just see if I would have it doing things part time with my own money.

I have my reputation also when I post such results. If the results are not there I would not dare to post. See if I have made a dishonest claim. No.. I have open mind to accept that I need to check and since all of the members doubt that the 630 volts and 20 amps result could come, I'm in the process of replicating it. I have also reported that for an increase of just 10 volts at no load from 240 to 250, the output increases by 60 watts at load conditions. Please do replicate the experiment. It is not easy to do and I have given you a lot of information.

Please do replicate the easy to do device, in the given configuration and you can check and verify for yourselves..I'm saying some thing that is not normal. some thing like that is magic..to repeat the words of other friends. Why not replicate and check it yourselves.  I have answered all questions..And when I theorized, I indicated that I'm theorizing and I have not done the theorized experiments.

Figuera and Hubbard both used a similar set up. That set up mimics the Earth. How it rotates. Figueras set up is based on full rotation of Earth. Hubbard set up is based on half rotation of Earth..And pleaes note that I'm a Not at all a rich man..I have my problems. I have my profession and clients and family. When I deciphered some thing that would be of interest and that is contrary to known or expected results, I would normally try to keep quiet. I'm posting the information that can be replicated and verified here. Please do replicate and see for yourselves. If you do not have the means to do so, let me post the videos.

I'm neither confusing nor am I confused. I have the results and you will see the results yourself. The details that I have given are not in any theory books.

Farmhand

Quote from: NRamaswami on February 17, 2014, 10:42:02 PM
Hi All:

I saw Farmhand's posts about a book..I don't go by books.. I go by my experimental results. I have not seen any book that says you need a particular voltage:amperage ratio for the secondary to start functioning effectively. We found out from experience.  What we share are the experimental results. Not abcd is stated in xyz book..I'm not an Electrical Engineer and I do not understand the page long calculations and so I ignore them all and trust my experimental results and then move on from there to do other experiments.

I agreed with newton II and also informed that we lost nearly 100 fuzes..So you well know that we have done a lot of work.

We will present the experimental results.. If they are not greater output than input also we will put it here..When I have the honesty to say all this what is my problem? I have no problem.. Really not worried if One member will not give me an ear..I am least bothered really if one member will not listen to me.. Experimental results that any one can replicate will be posted..

And I have asked how many of you have converted an iron to a permanent magnet and I have not received an answer. That is kept a secret.

So I do not care about much of other books. I do not care about what abcd theory says or xyz says.. All I care to see is what is the experimental results. Does it makes common sense? Can we go further without taking risks..

I will devise a safe method to test the high voltage output step down by a transformer and then giving it to a load by putting about 100 x 200 watts bulbs in parallel and keeping all of them on. give power to the primary to induce the secondary and then the step down transformer. Let us wait and see what the voltmeter and Ammeter show on the load. We will then know what happens.. What is the output wattage and what is the input wattage.. We will then see.. Do I have any thing to lose if I say look what we have got is less than the input..Nothing..

Do I have any thing to gain by saying look what I have got is more than the input. Again nothing..

I share the results with the community.. Nothing more and Nothing less. Will it change the world. I do not know and I do not think so..For I have got only two people indicating that they would attempt to replicate the experiments. And NewtonII who appears to be very experienced felt that the flux would be additive in the central core which is what should happen as that portion uses the forces of magnetic attraction.

The problem is all of you have studied theories and machines that use only forces of magnetic repulsion.

Figuera advocated a totally more efficient concept of using forces of magnetic repulsion and magnetic attraction combined to get a greater outpt than the input. If one module does not produce the results, we need to give the output of first module to the second and so on. All this increases the input voltage:amperage ratio. This is why I clearly mentioned at fixed low frequency of 50 hz, if you want to get better results increased the input voltage:amperage ratio but the amperage should be reasonbly ok, in the 5 to 10 amps range for magnetism to be effective. I have given all information..And I have said that larger the core size, longer the core and longer the number of wires and higher the number of turns all these things work..

Check Magnetic field strength in any book.. It would say Magnetic field strength = Number of Amperes x Number of turns.. Is there any mention of the need for higher voltage there..

Look at the inductor capacitor theory: As the magnetic field collapses, the electric field increases..As the electric field collapses the magnetic field increses..What does that mean.. A low magnetic field that can create high induced emf will result in a high electric field..This is borne out by our experiments. But if you give milliamps and 100,000 volts you would not see any results.. Input amps must be adequate to create a reasonable amount of magnetism, a low level magnetism to produce electric field.

Have you bought and open a bottle dynamo used in bicycles.. See that the magnet that rotates in dynamos is of very low magnetic strength. That is desired to produced current..

Any way I think we can build a self sustaining generator and give it a one shot electric current and make it continuously produce electric current. Then I will provide the full construction methods and why it works and how it works..That is if It works as I anticipate now. Many of my anticipations have been knocked out by experimental results and so I go only by experimental results..

Well I'm impressed, someone who had an OU device and knew it was OU, but left it to do other stuff, a person who apparently short circuits secondaries with a current meter, and who is against some conventional knowledge so much that a large post is required to explain why.

The part in the quote I made bold reminded me of something I heard said just recently almost exactly the same by another person. And although it is true magnetic field strength is determined by ampere turns, the voltage does not need to be mentioned because we know from Ohms Law "books" that if we want 10 amperes of current in a coil and the coil of wire has 10 ohms resistance then anything less than 100 volts will result in less than 10 amperes of current to begin with, so even though the voltage is not mentioned without the applied voltage there would be no current to cause any magnetism. No voltage no current - no current no magnetism. Very simple concept.

Cheers

EDITED:


NRamaswami

Farmhand:

At 12 volts, you can have a lot of amperes to flow. That would result in a very powerful magentic field. Extremely powerful magentic field retards the electric field. For efficient electric field to be developed, high voltage:ampere ratio is needed. This is the practical thing we found and we did not see it in any book. We have reported the results.

Whether a devie is OU or not is not my interest. My interest is my profession. When the Electrician who managed the experiments passed away we stopped it for sentimental reasons and I have already informed that I'm posting the information so others can take it forward. If it is laughable, I have no problem.

I have also promised that I will try to replicate the experiments and share the results. If the results are not what we felt they are also we would report them. If the results are lower input higher output also as I strongly expect it to be, we would report them. We would also provide full information on how to replicate. We will see next week.

forest

Waiting for detailed step by step tutorial.... I'm lost with details and don't want to cut my iron rods (I've already stripped hundreds of welding rods for that) before being sure if that is necessary.  Talk is cheap but material not, I think all here have others things to do also... Keep going, I pray for you success.

NRamaswami

Hi Forest:

Please hold. Rather than giving step by step instructions, right now,  I will show the proof of the pudding is in the eating by showing the set up live and on video. You can see what is the input voltage and amperage in the primary and what is the output Voltage and amperage going to the step down transformer. Then this issue is solved. 

I hope all will agree that this saves time, effort and money for all. The onus is on me to show the proof. Because replication attempt by all can result in significant costs to each one of you. Why spend it? I can replicate myself and then after you see the proof, you elect to replicate or otherwise at your choice. I think this is fair. Right.

We are now rebuilding the unit.. But give me some time. I can build the step down transformer only after determining the voltage level reached. I need to wind the first unit step by step to reach the 600 to 630 volts level. Last time we just tested a concept and so we did not measure the turns, did not check. This time we will need to test, be precise in measurements and so construction will take a few days.

For those who are interested in doing it on their own any way, the diagram is there and the construction details are in the earlier pages. You do not have perfect number of turns, spaces between turns, whether the air gap is in the core or between the plastic tubes etc. Let us avoid all miscommunication and misunderstanding.

I have claimed that all machines used today are based on the forces of Magnetic repulsion and that there is no machine that currently works  combining the forces of magnetic repulsion and magnetic attraction. No one has opposed that statement. So let me build such a device myself and let me show it online as a video.

If the Unit can output more than the input I think there are hundreds of friends here, well trained people here who can make it self sustain itself. All I need to prove is that the output is higher than the input. Let me do it. Until then please wait.   

I promise that there will be full disclosure after I have filed the PCT application.