Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[NRamaswami]

Hi Hanon and Bajac:

Please see attached French Patent and an Explanation by Patrick in his book. I got the patent from European Patent Database. The Patent specifically talks about iron core changing from one isotope to another isotope, releasing energy in the proess. My understanding that others tried to replicate it but could not do so as they were not able to give the frequency at 21 MHz used in the patent. The invention is now in public domain and is simple.

Everything in the world is based on Frequency. I think this is a statement of Tesla. While I'm not competent to comment, there are many devices that use frequency to heal problems of human body like pain, spasms etc and these devices work.

I suggest that you read the Secret of Life by Georges Lakhovsky pdf book easily available a Google search to know more about frequeny effects on living organisms and other matter.

[marathonman]

HANON and ALPOMA we are forever in your debt, words can not describe my gratitude i have for your contribution to the advancement  of the Figueras device. as i can not speak or read Spanish i again am forever in your debt more so.
all my life i have been on a mission pursuing happiness never really attaining my goal until i found this device. every day i wake up with hope and glee of the thought of some one has come up with an additional clue that will bring me or us closer to solving this buried treasure in the hope that man will be set free from his EVIL Tyrant of a big brother, free from oppression, hatred and mostly GREED.
since i have been on this forum i feel i have inched closer to my goal with the help of you fellow members. i have thoroughly enjoyed the posts and reading from Bajac and the rest of you on this forum no matter how big or small . again thank you from the bottom of my heart.

[NRamaswami]

Hi Marathonman:

It is most unlikely that any information about a self sustaining generator will be made available. Even if it is available, it may not be manufactured by any one and sold.

1. Science today teaches us that there can not be a device that has greater output than input. Scientists are very conservative like relgious minded people and would not say or accept any thing that is sacrilageous. If they do accept such new concepts, historically scientists were persecuted and no one would dare say any thing against what would be against the policy of the institution.

2. Businesses will not manufacture such devices even if they have the technology. Reason is common sense. Every business wants to make people buy from them again, again and again. Or set up a unit and keep charging their customers say for example cell phone companies. Electricity generation is similar.

This product is a one time sale and businesses after some time would have to close. Investment made in Electricity generation would suffer. So no bank would finance such industries either.

This is the practical reality.

[Cadman]

@ Anyone working with the 1908 Buforn patents.

Last summer I built a successful proof of concept of this device. The details were posted to this same topic over at energetic forum, starting around page 16 for those interested. It produced 9.2 vac, 13.0 volt peak, not rectified, with 12vdc input from a 500ma wall transformer. It only had 3 very small coils. The coils were identical, taken from small 12 volt DPDT relays. Input was controlled through an Arduino and transistor circuit, only because I did not have the means to build the commutator / resistor combination shown in the patent.

One of the most important things I learned from this build was the core/coil relation. It is exactly as the Buforn patent drawing shows. One center core, with each end inserted about 45% into each outer coil. There is a small gap between the three coils due to the coil bobbin ends in my build. The inducer coils were N-S N-S and the center coil was S-N.

Another very important point. Plotting the voltage/time curve of the Buforn commutator design shows an increase in brush dwell time every 180 degrees of rotation. This was confirmed in my build as it increased the output by approximately 84% when I added 40ms of dwell at these points. I suspect this allowed the one inducer coil time to build up it's magnetic field as the applied voltage reached it's peak. Also, the brush maintains contact with two tabs of the commutator at all times. Hitting the coils with a square wave gave very poor results, even with the added dwell.

Considering the inducer coils, they are no different than a solenoid coil in construction. The maximum gauss is at the center of those coils. In my opinion that is used to manipulate the flux of the centered core to create the output current, and that is why the center core is partly inside the outer coils. After a lot of study I am 100% certain the Buforn device uses a DC supply that steps the inducer coil current up and down in a percentage of the total current, split between the N-S inducers. This applies an almost constant total gauss to the center coil, unlike ordinary generators where the armature coils move through a magnetic field of less and more gauss.

Other advantages of this setup are:
No mechanical input other than the tiny motor to turn the commutator.
No hysteresis loss, normally caused by the core pole reversals, as there are none.

Keep in mind that the Buforn device is an improved generator / dynamo that is essentially like an old fashioned automobile generator, which has two outer field coils and an armature with many induced coils wound on it. One set of coils in Buforn's device, two inducers with one induced, is not going to develop significant output. That would be like removing all of the armature windings, except one, in the old car generator and expecting it to still work properly.

There is no mystery to the Buforn device and nothing significant is hidden in the patent. That's my opinion, based on my results and study. It is an improved generator, and correctly constructed (coil size / wire gauge, quantity of coils, and connection wiring) it will sustain itself and produce usable power.

All this being said, I hope it does not discourage research into the different devices currently being investigated here.

Regards

[a.king21]

Cadman:  I remember reading your post last summer re your testing of the Figuera/Buforn device.
I wonder, what prevented you from pursuing your research further?
Did you find some obstacle that prevented self running?
Your observations would be very much appreciated.