Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[hanon]

"SUPPOSE THAT ELECTROMAGNETS ARE


REPRESENTED BY RECTANGLES N and S ".


.

[marathonman]

YES SIR Mr Hanon this is "exactly" what i have been talking about as was passed to me. once the adjustments are made between the Primary and Secondaries the center support thickness of that exact distance can be cut and assembled. no other measurement is needed because the thickness is all ready set for all other Electromagnet bobbins whether it is round or square.
the distance will change as core, Bobbins size, Voltage, ect.. change.

i just named it Variable Inductance Cascade Amplifier because "The Figueras" sounds kinda dorky.

#1  it's currant is varied up and down which varies the Inductance.
#2  it is Cascaded to get your desired Voltage.
#3  it Amplifies the incoming signal.

thus you have the Variable Inductance Cascade Amplifier.

If he named the Rectangles and the Y core X, Y, Z would it be less confusing to every one. "NO WHERE" in his patents does it say North and South.
That was  fatal mistake in which through EVERYONE OFF for a long time and is still throwing you people off.

[digitalindustry]

digitalindustry;

This is the exactly the same post as #2845 and #2858. i am not speaking for everyone but i think we got your concerns the first time.
i don't see the need to repost. just sayin.

i just notice you guys filling the pages with repetitive and redundant data - so in that same sense my images might add a new vector to the fact that you are going over the principals of a transformer.

this image attached particularly highlights the the simplicity in which the original device was conceived.

it would be my advice to try building the 'Resistor' just as is displayed instead of trying to use modern  components or if you do you modern components then use a mix to compensate.

i think this is relevant and new info does anyone disagree? 

[citfta]

i just notice you guys filling the pages with repetitive and redundant data - so in that same sense my images might add a new vector to the fact that you are going over the principals of a transformer.

this image attached particularly highlights the the simplicity in which the original device was conceived.

it would be my advice to try building the 'Resistor' just as is displayed instead of trying to use modern  components or if you do you modern components then use a mix to compensate.

i think this is relevant and new info does anyone disagree?

Why do you keep posting the same thing over and over?  Are you desperate for someone to comment on what you are posting?  OK,  You have several things wrong with what you posted.  The resistor bank that is shown is just a resistor bank.  The windings are so far apart any inductance will be so small it probably can't even be measured.  And the same thing as far as capacitance.  With the windings spread out like in the drawing there would be no measurable capacitance.  Then you have a small capacitor that is so small it wouldn't have any inductance.  Then you show a small inductor that is too small to have any capacitance.  And then you show a carbon film resistor that has no capacitance or inductance.  And lastly there is no such thing as inductive capacitance.  An inductor can have capacitance and a capacitor can have inductance.  But inductive capacitance  is just a buzz word that means nothing.

Now will you please stop posting the same thing over and over?

[marathonman]

citfta;

I think the buzz word you are looking for is IDIOT, or it could mean NOTHING. which ever word you chose to peg on the Donkey's behind is ok with me.