Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[bajac]

Someone asked me for the link to the documents that I published a while ago about the Tesla technology. Here are the links and documents:

This is the thread where I posted the document related to the TPU: http://overunity.com/9101/tesla-is-the-father-of-the-tpu/#.VyynkvkrKCg

I was not able to find the threads for the Edwin Grey devices where I posted the attached document.

I think there is a pattern among the devices made by Grey and Marks, they mimic the Tesla coil operation but using different type of embodiment. See the similarities that I described in the documents.

I was working on the spark device shown in the document. I was preparing myself to carry on with the experiments. I even bought an adjustable 30KV DC power supply and I was in the process of finishing a metal cage box and a meter to detect any dangerous radiation. Then I stop the work when I learned about Figuera and Cook. I did not like to fool around with experiments that require the use of  high voltages and high frequencies.

I think the Cook's devices is the simpler of all FE. It does require a UPS unit to convert the energy to a AC sine voltage.

[marathonman]

The term was coined in May 1888 by Oliver Heaviside.The notion of "magnetic resistance" was first mentioned by James Joule and the term "magnetomotive force" (MMF) was first named by Bosanquet. The idea for a magnetic flux law, similar to Ohm's law for closed electric circuits, is attributed to H. Rowland.
Magnetic flux always forms a closed loop, as described by Maxwell's equations, but the path of the loop depends on the reluctance of the surrounding materials. It is concentrated around the path of least reluctance. Air and vacuum have high reluctance, while easily magnetized materials such as soft iron have low reluctance. The concentration of flux in low-reluctance materials forms strong temporary poles and causes mechanical forces that tend to move the materials towards regions of higher flux so it is always an attractive force (pull).
In a DC field, the reluctance is the ratio of the "magnetomotive force" (MMF) in a magnetic circuit to the magnetic flux in this circuit.
it is sometimes known as Hopkinson's law and is analogous to Ohm's Law with resistance replaced by reluctance, voltage by MMF and current by magnetic flux.
The magnetic reluctance  of a magnetic circuit can be regarded as the formal analog of the resistance in an electrical circuit.
Magnetic reluctance, or magnetic resistance, is a concept used mostly in the analysis of magnetic circuits. It is analogous to resistance in an electrical circuit, but rather than dissipating electric energy it stores magnetic energy. this concept was and still is not widely used except for a select few. very few new about Magnetic Resistance but apparently Clemente Figuera did.
This is exactly what Figuera did with his continuously rotating Part G. using reluctance as his resistance and having the ability to store magnetic energy in part G core to replace losses occurring from wire and heat which is small.  both halves of windings used to vary the resistance to currant flow to set N and set S  as the rotating brush makes contact in a continuous fashion.

[marathonman]

Clemente Figuera was more of a genius then i first realized. very few people used a magnetic field to limit or rather in Figuera's case vary the currant on a continuous basis with part G. Nicola Tesla was one of them also.

that is why i posted a pic of a bar being pulled out of a coil because that is what is happening in Figuera's part G. using a magnetic field to vary the currant between set N and set S.
this can be verified by EVERYONE in this forum at home.
as part G rotates it becomes the controller for the entire device using a magnetic opposing field and reluctance in part G to very the currant that is in constant rotating motion.
all currant is available to the primaries because everyone knows currant runs from negative to positive so that leaves part G to vary the currant. as the currant travels through the winding it causes a magnetic fields that resists the flow of currant, so more winding less currant less windings more currant.
also as the declining electromagnets are shoved out of the secondary the energy is stored in part G in the form of a magnetic field being replentished every half turn or every declining phase of the electromagnets.

so that tells me that part G is not only more valuable them meets the eye, it CAN NOT be replaced with IC's.

well at least on the low side anyways.

this is a lost art that most do not know about and probably can't find in any junk books of today.

"RELUCTANCE" RESISTANCE TO CURRANT FLOW ! "MAGNETICALLY"

[jegz]

look at figure 17 people....do you see Figuera? I do

http://free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapt22.html

Jegz

[marathonman]

Quote; "I do not agree with the mechanism you have selected (reluctance).  I don't think it practical nor even necessary to regulate current by varying reluctance.  It is far simpler to perform the exact same task via controlled manipulation of reactive cross section, specifically, XL."

I think it is as simple as it gets and the exact mechanics is of no consequence,  just the fact that he used magnetic field to control currant for which i am glad that someone FINALLY understands what i am saying. that he did not need wasteful resistors to vary the currant in his part G.  thank you !
using this method it stores the energy in the form of a magnetic fields NOT wasting it through resistors, much, much more efficient .

i don't see figure 17 coming remotely close to the output of Figuera device but i could be wrong. wouldn't have been the first time. Figuera's device uses two separate electromagnets occupying the same relative space in space causing one large or duel e field and the other having two complete separate spaces....em not to sure about this one.