Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

   As you can read part G is simplex. it is very simple but has a myriad of functions all happening at the same time. the very use of an inductor has so many confused but hopefully though my posts i have cleared some confusion toward part G.
most have a mind set that an inductor can only be used as a passive device which was handed down from generation after generation from the Dogma taught Government controlled school system that was implemented by good ole J.P. Morgan.

The facts i have presented can be verified by EVERY reader that reads this thread, that proves an inductor can be brought from a passive device to an active device and used in a dynamic state. i have posted the dynamics of how self inductance takes place,  the steps taken to get continuous increase or decrease of currant flow then taking the stored magnetic field of the inductor or electromagnet and using them in a very positive manor.
it behoves everyone that reads this thread to perform the suggested test that not only prove the validity of the  North North primary electromagnets but also the validity of part G. all test performed have been proven on the bench and backed up with Physics and science.

using a core and winding the primaries and the secondaries on the same core is NOT the Figuera device in any way shape or form and is just a transformer. anyone that says any different is a complete fool and does not know the difference between a transformer and a Generator in the first place and needs a reality check.
the Figuera device being a Generator, separates the primaries from the secondaries for certain reasons. if the primaries were to be on the same core it would cause the transfer of Hysteresis and eddy currant to the primaries which would cause the reduction of magnetic field resulting in large heat losses in the primaries. by remaining separate the magnetic fields from the primaries resides in a space outside of it's core which is the space occupied by the secondary.  this allows the primaries to do the intended job of being electromagnets and have no ill effects from the secondary what so ever.

reading and understanding the patent is such a vital step in the replication of this device but researching and testing on the bench proving it's operation of each device opens the door to knowledge and is the gateway to a complete self running device with not only this device but other in the past and future.

i hope these post from me will help the readers in the understanding of this well forgotten device and bring it's long forgotten simple technology to the present day that can do nothing but aide in the advancement of HUMANITY.

Love and peace not war and hatred.

Marathonman

[marathonman]

darediamond'
I am being stern and slightly abrasive not insulting. rereading the Websters dictionary will give you a fresh perspective on the word insulting.

You have not even built the original and therefore do not understand all the dynamic involved so how in the world can you make improvements to a device you have personally NEVER built. you and Rswami parade around this website like your the authority on the Figuera device which HAS NEVER been built by either of you. his device is a transformer plain and simple and not remotely associated with the Figuera device and you have never provided any pictures of your so called IMPROVED version let alone provided any bench work proving the validity of it.
neither of you have put any reasonable time to understand this device thus shows in your lack of understanding.
you are just like Rswami when he tried to build the Thane Heins transformer and spent 4 days on the device and said it will not work. WOW ! 4 whole days and he is the expert in which someone else did the work for him.

I have a good chuckle every time i read the craziness from the both of your post and shake my head at the sheer misunderstanding of the device.
and i would really like to know how you posted three days ago and it just now showed up today. hummm ! the use of trickery maybe or just moderated.
you know squat about the Figuera device plain and simple and it show in your posts.

you might ask yourself why did i spend so much time with this device.? simply i wanted to completely understand this device in detail right down to the last part so i can replicate it then re give it to the world. just like Doug said you cant sit in the back of the class sleeping and expect to pass the test unless you cheat. and in this case you even cheating will get you no where.

try actually reading and understanding what was posted and maybe some day you will actually have a working device. until then it is quite enjoyable watching a couple of puppies chasing their own tail.
Bark, Bark Woof !

PS. this is not my thread, i just post real scientific facts here of the Figuera device not fiction and snow jobs.

have a good day.

Marathonman

[darediamond]

I am not in for mechanical or 'half-baked'  solid state over unity devices. I developex sometimes ago a working Mechanical Resonance Lensless alternator on a small scale. Seeing the effect of resonance even at low rpm or frequency, I choose to stick with motionless version alone.

Figuera Gen working principle is simple to understand. Part-G inverts and yes prevents reversal to 0 and that is practically  achievable too in Solid state.

Bucking coil is applied to mainly negate Lenz but with resonance induction, you can also negate Lenz like I have done. This means single Primary and secondary can be used without the source power being loaded any further.

I do not have to show you things I have done for the sake of you believing me. I do not even need you to believe me.

The mechanical alternating to and fro of magnets is what Figuera mimicked with his half way motionless alternator; Now we can make the alter fully motioless and generate desired output.

You spin no electrons, you get no useful electric power.

Leave been an "authority" alone just be dynamic.

[marathonman]

Again i can not emphasize the importance when winding your electromagnets specifically as electromagnets. there is no reason to wind them with high resistance to control currant as that is the job of part G. why add more complexity to the system then need be. winding them specifically as electromagnets will allow them to adapt to the changes in currant darn near instantly maintaining the coherency needed between the primaries.

also you have to realize that the peak currant when the electromagnet is high is such a short time frame that the the wire will not burn up. hypothetically if i was to use say 18 awg wire for my primaries. even though the rating for that wire is low and you exceeded that for a fraction of milliseconds it will not have any ill effects. if a steady currant exceeding the rating was applied it of course would heat and burn up.

so even though you might exceed the rating of the wire the time frame it is at peak currant flow will be in the low hundred microsecond range and that is not enough time to harm the wire.

example;  say the brush on part G is traveling at 3600 which is the RPM required to get 60 HZ out of the secondary for the US. since there are 1000 milliseconds  in a second divided by 60 revolutions per second = 16.66 milliseconds per revolution.  now divide 16.66 by the number of winding's that make contact with the brush as it rotates and hypothetically lets say 60 in it's complete rotation. that ends up to be .277 which is 277 microseconds per winding but the ends are on for twice as long as the ones in the middle so it ends up being 554 microseconds.

so you see the primary currant at it's peak is only on for 554 microseconds and this is way to short of a time to heat up a wire let along burn it up.

just a few things to keep in mind when winding your electromagnets SPECIFICALLY AS ELECTROMAGNETS.



Marathonman

[seaad]

https://vimeo.com/178144785