Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Crystal Cell Research

Started by plengo, October 29, 2012, 06:08:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

plengo

Quote from: profitis on November 02, 2014, 03:19:41 AM
Yes its very possible to use two same electrodes in both a galvanic setup and also catalytic spillover setup.in the galvanic setup one aluminum piece is less exposed to oxidizer(air) than the other aluminum piece.in another situation one aluminum piece is attacked more quicker than the other due to porosity and surface area leading to massive eddy current hysterisis giving a galvanic potential.with nonreactive electrodes (eg.platinum) you can get spillover effect from different exposure to air or h2.spillover effect does not consume inert catalyst electrode material


Thanks for the helpful answer.


So and either case explained above I SHOULD expect either REDOX or GALVANIC result?


Fausto.

profitis

Correct yes.either spillover current or corrosion current

Billynjamie

Plengo this is BackRoom Labs from YouTube. I have posted here before. In about three weeks I'll be back into this scene. I plan on experimenting with sliver nitrate for the redox effect. I'm sure you have seen John Bedinis 1 amp flooded cell. At first I thought the blue was from copper sulfate after much research I found it has almost no effect. But the only other thing that would turn blue in contact with copper is silver nitrate.  Although silver nitrate in contact with magnesium and small amounts of water is extremely exothermic. But when in a lot of water it seems to be ok hench JB's flooded cell. Have you given this any thought? But that's where I'm heading.

plengo

Quote from: Billynjamie on January 19, 2015, 02:09:12 AM
Plengo this is BackRoom Labs from YouTube. I have posted here before. In about three weeks I'll be back into this scene. I plan on experimenting with sliver nitrate for the redox effect. I'm sure you have seen John Bedinis 1 amp flooded cell. At first I thought the blue was from copper sulfate after much research I found it has almost no effect. But the only other thing that would turn blue in contact with copper is silver nitrate.  Although silver nitrate in contact with magnesium and small amounts of water is extremely exothermic. But when in a lot of water it seems to be ok hench JB's flooded cell. Have you given this any thought? But that's where I'm heading.


Bily,


I was thinking about this "blue" thing LAST NIGHT. My cells that are working extremely well (one example is the series of graphs I presented earlier) has this "blue" color and it is NOT copper sulfate or derivatives. I know because the color is not the same, at least in my "monkey" ways.


I have been quiet for a few weeks now because I want to make sure my next data set is indeed worthy to show and validate my thoughts.


One think that I am becoming very convinced is that the cell indeed NEEDS to dry up and form a very hard rock like structure and only then it will use water as a fuel. I am getting really close to replicate it. Unfortunately it took 3 months to get this cell ready, bummer.


Please, try with your idea and share it. I think you are onto something.


Fausto.

Peter Kasaj

ultra-battery-one    kilogram  weight-decades  of  driving-without  charging Weight  reduction-  no  engine,  gearbox,  no  fuel,  oil,  just  car  body  and  el.  motors  .Did  you  know  that scientist  made  battery  (picture  in  middle)  from  uranium?  And  did  you  know  that  7g  of  uranium  is powering  3  millions  of  houses  a  day?And  did  you  know  that  scientist  made  most  powerful  non  nuclear energy  material  by  pressing  XeF2  by  100000  atmospheres,  which  is  near  of  uranium  on  power  basis?  My idea  is  to  replace  XeF2  instead  of  uranium,  and  keep  the  princip  how  the  energy  is  converting  to electricity  flow.  Imagine  one  kilo  of  this  battery  and  car  is  running  for  decades,  also  could  be  used  in homes  energy  supply  etc.  Is  the  most  powerful  portable  non-nuclear  energy  storage  ever,  The  battery  is made  of  Xenon  difluoride  (XeF2),  a  white  crystal  that's  been  placed  in  a  diamond  anvil  cell.  Pressure  is able  to  reach  a  million  atmospheres  and  when  this  happens,  3D  metallic  networks  structures  are  formed. The  formation  causes  compression  and  stores  its  power  as  chemical  energy,  generating  a  huge  amount  of it.  Is  the  most  condensed  form  of  energy  storage  outside  of  nuclear  energy  .We'll  see  this  technology  used in  super-oxidizing  materials  that  can  destroy  chemical  and  biological  agents,  not  to  mention  new  fuels and,  most  obviously,  an  energy  storage  device,superconductors.I  personally  giving  to  this  battery promised  future  or  the  idea  which  will  press  materials  and  use  their  energy  from  their  deformed  structures ,like  personal  electricity  plant,its  possible  to  regulate  battery  power  as  newly  created  nuclear  battery  in picture  below,which  works.Nuclear  battery  works  like  this:when  high-energy  beta  radiation  passes through  the  platinum  and  the  nanoporous  titanium  dioxide,  electron-hole  pairs  are  produced  within  the titanium  dioxide,  creating  an  electron  flow  and  a  resultant  electric  current.The  ionic  solution  is  not  easily frozen  at  very  low  temperatures  and  could  work  in  a  wide  variety  of  applications  including  car  batteries and,  if  packaged  properly,  perhaps  spacecraft."radiation  can  be  converted  into  electricity.So  much  so,  that the  water-based  nuclear  battery  may  well  offer  a  viable  alternative  to  the  solar  cell  as  a  sustainable,  lowpollution  energy  source.This  principe  could  by  transformed  also  for  XeF2  and  we  can  regulate  that power.Comparing  to  uranium-Before  being  used  to  produce  electricity,  Uranium  is  extracted  and  then transformed  into  cylindrical  7g  blocks,  which  will  then  be  grouped  together  into  tubes  that  will  in  turn  be assembled  into  clusters  and  then  installed  in  nuclear  reactors.  Uranium  is  the  most  energetic  material known  on  earth:  a  7g  block  of  enriched  uranium  provides  as  much  energy  as  1  tonne  of  petrol  or  1.5 tonnes  of  coal.  A  power  station  supplying  a  city  of  3  million  inhabitants  only  uses  3  kilos  of  Uranium  a day.So  one  small  battery  with  7grams  of  XeF2  calculating  with  almost  or  i    the  same  specification  as uranium  will  replace  one  ton  of  petrol?50  kilos  of  petrol  each  fueling  ,so  it  is  one  ton  1000/50=20  fueling times  of  car(around  700km  per  fuel  tank  x20  =14  000  km  per  one  small  battery(I  do  14  000  km  per  year and  I  spent  for  fuel  1200  euro  minimum  a  year)  so  if  one  kilo  battery  (1000gram  /7  g=  142  years  of driving)if  even  half  energy  of  uranium,we  can  still  drive  71  years,I  couldnt  find    information  how  much power  is  truly  from  pressed  FeX2  if  is  comparable  to  nuclear  energy  as  scientist  says  than  we  can  have product  like  battery  as  we  now    today  almost  everlasting  for  everyone.  Safety-must  be  made  lots  of  car crashes  scenarios  to  keep  passengers  protected(car  falling  to  water,  burning  contacts,  possible  battery damage  etc)and  how  to  switch  battery  off  safely  and  quickly.  If  regulated  and  covered  properly,  safety will exceed current safety standards.