Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[tagor]

Part of a translated commentary by Charlie Renegade, whoever he is 


The experiment was made in Belgium by physicist Eric D'ocker (or D'Hoker or even D'Hocker), which claims to have obtained secondary 4x more energy than it would have sent the primary. Myth or Reality? Where does the energy thus created? The professor said that referring Valley Energy and amplified in the primary (carbon + winding) it is possible to amplify the power of the current maximum of 8 kW per gram of carbon. Any replacement of carbon by another material is ineffective (no amplification). It is therefore possible, from a small electrical pulse to start, get an electric current self-powered and self-amplified from a single stick of carbon? Professor Ren?-Louis Valley states, Professor Eric D'ocker confirmed.
......

this is a lot of craps

nobody knows about the reality of this setup !!!

you speak of : Eric d'Hoker ( I put a lot of link on this setup)

he was a student in 1975
he was a in contact with R L Vallee before 1975
he was never more in contact with R L Vallee after his setup

now he is a real known professor
I am sure he does not answer to your questions ( you know what happened to Pons and Fleishman !)

[Feynman]

when and where is the OU conference ?
pc

The first International Overunity Conference will be held at Bohemian Grove.       JK  we don't know where or when it's gonna be yet,  maybe Berlin or the Caymans.   Right now it's just an idea.  Maybe we should start a thread to discuss people's ideas.

[duff]

again, energetics are such that beta particles should not be produced with this reaction.

even in the presence of distributed graphene (which should actually be graphane since it contains no double bonds - semantics).

The arc was influenced due to the lorentz force.

Another interesting effect is to charge up a HV capacitor with small plates soldered onto the leads. Hold the plates on either side of a candle flame.

Ever see a flame turn sideways?

Yes, flames are plasma.

All charged particles obey the lorentz force. A flame can be influenced by a magnetic field, but since it is an equilibrium plasma, convective forces will generally dominate until you reach substantially higher magnetic field strengths than you would normally run into in an average lab setting.

The beta particles will feel an electrostatic or magnetic field just like any other electron.

give it a shot with a candle or torch and those neos, however. Perhaps combine the effects, I'd love to see it!

I tried the experiment with a torch but the magnets had no effect on the flame that I could perceive. The magnets are now 2+ years old so perhaps not a strong now.

Thanks for the explanation.

-Duff

[powercat]

The first International Overunity Conference will be held at Bohemian Grove.       JK  we don't know where or when it's gonna be yet,  maybe Berlin or the Caymans.   Right now it's just an idea.  Maybe we should start a thread to discuss people's ideas.

  Berlin is good for me as i am in Holland. A new thread on iInternational Overunity Conference is a good idea. I'd like to know Stefan's thoughts on this before i get to expectant.

im off topic so ill stop here
pc

[xee]

@Duff,
First, my compliments to you on your experiment design and documentation. Second, did you have a voltage (can be either DC or low audio AC) providing a current through the flame? In order for the flame to be effected by the magnets there must be a current flowing through it. The current will be carried by ions (charged particles in the gas of the flame). A candle is usually used to do this. I have not personally done this, but I do think it works.

EDIT: Best to use DC. It may be hard to see the flame moving with AC input.