Has An Important Property Of Fluids Been Overlooked ?

[minnie]

Hi,
    what I've been looking at is in the context of a little toy we were trying to make. I just felt that gravity just pulls two masses
together and to put energy into the system we must pull them apart.
    I honestly haven't a clue about gravitational energy and quasars or whatever, just my thoughts on making  a curiosity here
on Earth.
    I'm just enjoying a few of Fletcher's ideas and really appreciate being put right by others who know a lot more than me.
What I have learned is even if we get our toy to work it won't have much power unless built on a massive scale.
                                                              John

[Aman Shah]

Hi,
    what I've been looking at is in the context of a little toy we were trying to make. I just felt that gravity just pulls two masses
together and to put energy into the system we must pull them apart.
    I honestly haven't a clue about gravitational energy and quasars or whatever, just my thoughts on making  a curiosity here
on Earth.
    I'm just enjoying a few of Fletcher's ideas and really appreciate being put right by others who know a lot more than me.
What I have learned is even if we get our toy to work it won't have much power unless built on a massive scale.
                                                              John

Thanks Minnie.I hope you can also learn quiet a good amount of information by visiting my blog on Bessler wheels.Do visit all my articles on my blog on Bessler wheels.com

[minnie]

Hi,
   thank you Aman. I found your blog O.K. and there's quite a bit for me to take in. I think about these concepts
as I'm doing my job, then I come back to it for another go.
                                                                                      John.

[Aman Shah]

Welcome.Do read all the 4 articles as of now of my blog.

[fletcher]

@ All ..

Back on line.

To complete the concept ..

I set out in this thread with the intention to come up with a POP mechanism that could be built & tested for validity & I went thru a series of progressive & more complex steps, building a picture to a reciprocating or rotary device.

The crux of any asymmetric device is the ability to find balance in one configuration & unbalance in another.

I said that I had a new type of theoretical balance mechanism that could achieve that goal - it had similarities to the Roberval Balance - the Roberval has torque issues & will remain upright with the use of a wide base for support - this one does not, IINM.

I propose that my non compressible fluid lever & pantograph balance has no torque wherever a mass is applied in a symmetrical system.

Mass & pressure are scalar quantities - they can be vectored as forces - the use of the pantograph parallelogram redirects weight force to the other side of a symmetrical non compressible fluid filled enclosed container [i.e. pascals principle of undiminished pressure transmission re hydrostatics] - the pantograph is rigidly attached to the fluid container - pressures & forces are spread evenly throughout the liquid, all forces are in equilibrium therefore there is no torque & the system is balanced - the system self adjusts for different mass loadings - like the hydrostatic paradox the total weight of the system is the combined masses however the contention is that torque can be removed.

The 'balance apparatus' does not work upside down & is unbalanced.