9/11 truth movement topic

[ring_theory]

Tell me this, instead of uping the US defense and arming Americans, we are sending our defense to another country, where they are being shot at and ambushed. Tell me were this doesn't sound completely stupid?

It is very stupid but the up side is that we are not a police state already. Which upping the defense would be putting the citizens more at risk with big brother looking over your shoulder looking for terrorist cells. However it is leaving us WIDE open for more attacks! were all looking squirrelly at the administration trying to pin it on them. while we are blindsided by another attack that would more than likely seal the administrations fate as a revolution would most likely ensue. anarchy would soon follow if anything was left of us as bush would probably be deep underground with his sweaty little fingers on the button to end it for us for sure.

There are many scenarios! the one i like the most would be to take all of Israel and bring them here as refugees. let the Muslims have the land. Problem solved!!  However they wouldn't be happy with that and continue their jihad. until they have destroyed the entire planet.     

[chadj2]

 Hi Ring,

You seem like you are pretty well informed. Do you find it hard to believe that the oil corporations gain greatly from an Iraq that is unable to export oil anymore thereby driving down supply? Also do they (oil corporations) not benefit from the price increase of oil due to the instability in the middle east? In increase in the value of their stockpiles which they didnt really have work for. Do you not find it interesting that soon after the Soviets stop the arms race with us and defense spending becomes tougher to justify we coincidently get a new enemy which really can't be defeated resulting in massive defense spending increases? Also, lets play devils advocate; if you wanted to consolidate power over the population and have a good excuse to remove constitutional roadblocks preventing your exertion of that power can you think of a better enemy to have than something as ambiguous as terrorists hiding around every corner supposedly always ready to attack your subjects unless you protect them? Dont you also find it interesting that Iraq is expeditiously headed for failed state status which means inability to make payments on debts translating into them needing the World Bank to come in and assist. Of course the international bankers wont do this out of the kindness of their hearts; they will demand Iraqi resources as collateral. Those are just some of the factions that benefited from 9/11. I am sure that you know about the power of each of these factions even seperately. One oil corporation earns 10 Billion profit per quarter. PROFIT!!!!!! not revenue. How much influence can you buy with that much cash. That is just one factions power. I dont think it is hard to believe that these factions could get together and plan a conspiracy to substantially advance all of their causes.

[d3adp00l]

The Islamic-muslim Fascism comments came from Bush, then I hear it parroted on fox news
( michelle malkin, hannity and colmes, the oreilly factor...)
Then I hear it from ring theory.

Since there is 1.6 billion in fake news. You have to wonder where he get's his beliefs from.

#1. I rarely watch tv. I do so rarely, that i don't have cable or satellite tv. Antenna only nets me 4 channels 4,6,8 and 18. all local. So any parroting or similarities that i report are purely coincidental. I haven't received any of the supposed 1.6 bln and i don't watch tv. so where do i get my beliefs? Not from any one news source i'll tell you that.

So if your local fox/abc/nbc owned tv channels aren't giving you your news then who is, I pray?

[d3adp00l]

You report this as purely coincidental! wow.. I'm suprised.

Where did you get your muslim-islamic fascist belief then? Please enlighten all of us.
Your psychic ability is awesome!

The washington post article on 1.6 billion on paid news should be a credible source of info.

It don't take much to surprise you then. 

I don't have a "muslim-islamic fascist belief" I do have some harsh opinions of some factions of their beliefs particularly the radical extremists. All warranted by their actions. The phrase "reap what you sew" comes to mind. I have muslim-islamic friends so not all factions of their beliefs are in general BAD. they will tell you that there is a big difference in the way they (the radical extremists) are interpreting the koran. I urge you to go to the nearest Islamic temple and inquire for yourself. Go on a fact finding mission, find out about the religion, ask many questions.

Washington post "should be a credible source" should would indicate that you yourself still have questions and doubts about them. Don't believe the ONE source seek other sources. In general seek the truth! Seek multiple resources!     

Show me an article of the contrary ring. Is it and absolute just because one news agency said so, no, but why don't you look up the oversight organization that told the post, thats two against zero. Looks more credible than you just attacking the post and people for bringing the info forward. I agree with the idea of multiple sources, but I think your being hypercritical, no one has jumped on a soapbox about the article but you.

[ring_theory]

You report this as purely coincidental! wow.. I'm suprised.

Where did you get your muslim-islamic fascist belief then? Please enlighten all of us.
Your psychic ability is awesome!

The washington post article on 1.6 billion on paid news should be a credible source of info.

It don't take much to surprise you then. 

I don't have a "muslim-islamic fascist belief" I do have some harsh opinions of some factions of their beliefs particularly the radical extremists. All warranted by their actions. The phrase "reap what you sew" comes to mind. I have muslim-islamic friends so not all factions of their beliefs are in general BAD. they will tell you that there is a big difference in the way they (the radical extremists) are interpreting the koran. I urge you to go to the nearest Islamic temple and inquire for yourself. Go on a fact finding mission, find out about the religion, ask many questions.

Washington post "should be a credible source" should would indicate that you yourself still have questions and doubts about them. Don't believe the ONE source seek other sources. In general seek the truth! Seek multiple resources!     

Show me an article of the contrary ring. Is it and absolute just because one news agency said so, no, but why don't you look up the oversight organization that told the post, thats two against zero. Looks more credible than you just attacking the post and people for bringing the info forward. I agree with the idea of multiple sources, but I think your being hypercritical, no one has jumped on a soapbox about the article but you.

It's not about the article at all. it's about the seeking of multiple sources. rather than depending on one sources accuracy. often other details come to light from a different source or multiple sources. this is a search able media refine your query.