9/11 truth movement topic

[HopeForHumanity]

While showing the videos to the person next to me, we both noticed something. Why were the videos repeating frame till the end?

What does that have to do with it? and you said i believe the media hype now your seeking a conspiracy within someones shitty editing job? OMFG!!

I asked why! I didn't try to start a conspiracy. How can you just conclude that?

[ring_theory]

While showing the videos to the person next to me, we both noticed something. Why were the videos repeating frame till the end?

What does that have to do with it? and you said i believe the media hype now your seeking a conspiracy within someones shitty editing job? OMFG!!

I asked why! I didn't try to start a conspiracy. How can you just conclude that?

by the way you hold on to the whole 9/11 conspiracy thing like it's to be coddled.

[ring_theory]

WE ARE ONLY POINTING OUT FACTS,

You are pointing nothing of the sort. LOL! You don't have one fact right. You are a nut if you believe what is presented as a conspiracy is fact. LOL!

It is a fact that there were things of demolition nature present in the collapse
It is a fact that the smoke from the towers represented a choked fire
It is a fact that the fire colors represented a cold fire
It is a fact that the steel from the building was removed to early
It is a fact that the core of the building was missing, even though in the pancake model  its still there
It is a fact that the concrete was completely vaporized
It is a fact that explosive elements were present after the collapse
It is a fact that people heard multiple explosions from the tower
I could go on and on, but these are just "conspiracies". How could vaporized concrete be a "fact"?

"It is a fact that there were things of demolition nature present in the collapse"
No there was one similarity. the buildings went from a constructed structure to a pile of rubble. Due to gravity! but still no proof of a conspiracy

"It is a fact that the smoke from the towers represented a choked fire"
No! Smoke does not constitute that there was no fire or that the fire was being suffocated. There was a hole you could fit an aircraft through there was plenty of oxygen. but still no proof of a conspiracy

"It is a fact that the fire colors represented a cold fire"
Cold fire? Um ok. but still no proof of a conspiracy

"It is a fact that the steel from the building was removed to early"
I agree but still doesn't present that it was a conspiracy.

"It is a fact that the core of the building was missing, even though in the pancake model  its still there"
They didn't pancake. it was a flow similar to an avalanche somewhat contained by the outer structure of the towers till they too became victim. but still no proof of a conspiracy

"It is a fact that the concrete was completely vaporized"
Yes it was vaporized or rather pulverized. but still no proof of a conspiracy.

"It is a fact that explosive elements were present after the collapse"
Yeah with a couple other million elements. but still no proof of a conspiracy

"It is a fact that people heard multiple explosions from the tower"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI-RCpdy9tw&NR=1 I'm hearing very clearly a constant rumble of churning matter. NOT explosions! but still no proof of a conspiracy. 

"How could vaporized concrete be a "fact"?"
Um ok whatever! 

[d3adp00l]

I will admit I have not read this entire thread.  However, to any of you who think the U.S. government or the Administration somehow planned this, I have to ask - assuming this was the outcome they wanted, the do you really think they would take the chance?  There would almost be guaranteed leaks.  If exposed, the planners would surely face trial and life sentences or worse.  And believe me, someone would talk.

In the following video, Noam Chomsky, the great liberal and no friend to the Bush administration, makes this argument better than I ever could.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzGd0t8v-d4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoDqDvbgeXM

How many covert ops go on from our and other gov. that don't get leaked? Many and so this isn't like that huh.

[d3adp00l]

@hope, It is a fact the Deutsche Bank Building caught fire after being damaged from the debris from the towers and it did not collapse...
  It is a fact that a building burned in china recently.... it did not collaspe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Bank_Building

Fire

On August 18, 2007 at approximately 3:40pm a 7-alarm fire broke out on the 17th floor of the building. The skyscraper, once 41 stories, had been reduced to 26, with crews removing a floor a week. At the time of the fire, crews were removing asbestos. The fire spread in both directions effecting a total of 10 floors. The floors were filled with a maze of protective polyurethane sheets which were designed to prevent the spread of asbestos. The sheets also helped to trap smoke making fighting the fire near impossible. Two firefighters, Joseph Graffagnino, 33, of Brooklyn, and Robert Beddia, 53, of Staten Island were found on the 14th floor. They suffered severe smoke inhalation and died from a cardiac arrest, fire officials said. In addition to the nightmare conditions inside, the building did not have a functioning standpipe. Firefighters were forced to raise hoses up from the street to combat the flames. The fire burned into the night before being put out. The cause of the fire is still unknown, however plans to deconstruct the building will still continue as quickly as possible. [7]

A statement on poly..
Health and safety

Fully reacted polyurethane polymer, CAS # 9009-54-5 (CAS registry number), is chemically inert. In the United States, no exposure limits have been established by OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) or ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists). It is not regulated by OSHA for carcinogenicity. Polyurethane polymer is a combustible solid and will ignite if exposed to an open flame for a sufficient period of time. Decomposition products include carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen, and hydrogen cyanide. Firefighters should wear self-contained breathing apparatus in enclosed areas. Polyurethane polymer dust can cause mechanical irritation to the eyes and lungs. Proper hygiene controls and personal protective equipment (PPE), such as gloves, dust masks, respirators, mechanical ventilation, and protective clothing and eye wear should be used.

Liquid resin blends and isocyanates may contain hazardous or regulated components. They should be handled in accordance with manufacturer recommendations found on product labels, and in MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet) and product technical literature. Isocyanates are known skin and respiratory sensitizers, and proper engineering controls should be in place to prevent exposure to isocyanate liquid and vapor.

In the United States, additional health and safety information can be found through organizations such as the Polyurethane Manufacturers Association (PMA) and the Center for the Polyurethanes Industry (CPI), as well as from polyurethane system and raw material manufacturers. Regulatory information can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 (Food and Drugs) and Title 40 (Protection of the Environment).