TK device, TPU.. Only enter if you seek truth. Cause here it is...

[wasabi]

I'd like to notice that the range of 1MeV beta particles in copper is between 0.5mm and 1mm.  That's ~10⁶ more than the free mean path of conduction electrons in the single eV range.

Also the "beta range" of positrons in metals seem to be slightly higher than for fast electrons of the same energy in the same solid metal.  I cannot explain why the difference in copper is apx. +0.1mm for positrons.

A fast electron that is the result of ⁶⁴Cu beta decay can survive for 1mm at most in solid copper, but there is no way it can survive for 20cm or for multiple orbits of such length.

[yfree]

A fast electron that the result of ⁶⁴Cu beta decay can survive for 1mm at most in solid copper, but there is no way it can survive for 20cm or for multiple orbits of such length.

Very good remark.
McFreey never suggested that the electrons in the orbit are always the same as in the regular cyclotron, not to mention, they make multiple orbits. This is the quote:
"Thus, the circulating particles are not the same in the orbit as it is in a normal cyclotron. On the contrary, a charged particle's life-time in the disc is very short, and they are constantly being absorbed and regenerated at the expense of element transmutation within the material.  However, between collisions, these particles are still subject to the Lorentz force."

[yfree]

  .

[wasabi]

Please watch this video by TK, and present on this forum a reasonable explanation of the working principle of this "OU" device.

I hate to write this but in light of Wattsup's latest video analysis of Tariel Kapanadze's clandestine delivery of external electric power to his 2004 device (a.k.a. "green box") by the "bearded guy" (see here), I bet on a stator or even a complete motor being hidden in the white foam and being powered by an external supply of electric current fed through electric contacts concealed in the little feet on the bottom of the device, that are visible when it is lifted up.

BTW:
In reference to McFreey's diagram, the magnetic steel flux guides, adjacent to the brass disks, are missing in this video.

[elementSix]

If anyone needs proof that a form of NMR is what is going on and they aren't smart enough to put all the puzzel pieces together.  Take a look at the UP TO 5KW DEVICES by Tarieal Kapanadze.  Since I posted all that info.  All of the regurlar guys have used their other screen names to help in the TK fake bashing party.  It's a joke.  Just do the experament and find the resonance of the copper or iron and use a good signal pulsing device and you will get all the proof you need.  I have talked to a professor at a University about using a Terranova NMR setup.  I will have some quick info on what metals or ceramics I am going to use with my device and what Frequency's are used.  Zeitmachine just posted info about Paramagnetic Resonance.  He called it Parametric Resonance.  Not sure what the diff. is, but same thing is achieved.