Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



1850 Watts free energy power ? New GEGENE circuit by JL Naudin shows COP = 2.8

Started by hartiberlin, December 29, 2012, 08:16:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

mikestocks2006

Quote from: TinselKoala on January 08, 2013, 01:12:52 PM
Why oh why do people insist on using the "box label" on a device as the "output power" no matter "watt" ? If a light bulb says "500 Watts" on it, that does NOT mean that it will always dissipate 500 Watts !! This is its rated power dissipation when it is supplied with its rated voltage from a source capable of supplying the necessary current so that the voltage doesn't sag. Just because there are 1800 watts of bulbs connected to the circuit and glowing, that does not mean that the circuit is dissipating 1800 Watts !!
Jean-Louis surely knows this.

I am watching this thread and his videos with great amusement. The chances of self-looping are nil. The output power available is less than the input power and he's already confirmed this by two independent sets of measurements: the rough calorimetry, which could NOT be in error by enough to invalidate his results, and also the photometry of the light output.
Exactly!
If it really produces a true 2.8 out for every 1 in then a looping self-runner should be no problem, (conversion efficiencies included), and it will be the ultimate proof.
Great thread/info/links

Thanks
Mike

hartiberlin

Hmm,
from:

http://jnaudin.free.fr/gegene/gegene13en.htm

we see, that he uses about 750 Watts from the grid,
but his whole unit needs 990 Watts to run.

So who is supplying the EXTRA 240 Watts ?

Or are the lights bulbs only as bright.
as if really only 750 Watts would be fed into the whole system ???

Hmm...confusing...

As the Kettle water cooker and the light comparison have shown, the system seems to be underunity,
but this new test is baffling again... hmm...


Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

gotoluc

I don't know why now so many are interested in JLN last video as if he came up with this idea.  The exact same test was done 5 days ago by Romero UK and almost no one commented.

Jan. 3rd Post: http://www.overunity.com/13228/1850-watts-free-energy-power-new-gegene-circuit-by-jl-naudin-shows-cop-2-8/msg349857/#msg349857

Romero UK video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8_zj4cRXYk&feature=em-uploademail

hartiberlin

yes Romero did the same test but it even was more confusing cause he never posted a circuit diagram and not everybody knows how a grid tie inverter works.....

so is this just some kind of bootstrap effect with the second power meter showing wrong values or why does it show 240 watts more input power ??
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

Cherryman

What i don't really understand is the fact that JLN has an excellent track record of the most complicated tests and reproductions , with very complicated systems and measurements..


Then he vanishes for a long while ...


And returns with this... stating a bold conclusion.. based on the output of the brightness ...


Am I the only one who find it a little strange..?


He should (or does) know better..


Unless he is trying to tell us something between the lines....