1850 Watts free energy power ? New GEGENE circuit by JL Naudin shows COP = 2.8

[casman1969]

Gentlemen, please..,
Light and lumens as an indicator of overunity?
Let's do this the simple ( my level ) way by using a high amp hour battery connected to a 2kw inverter, feed the induction heater from its output, use the output coil(s) stepped down (transformer) bridge rectified output to loop back to the battery and see if there is a net gain or loss. If a net = or gain on the battery, then you really do have something. simple impedance matching from the output coil to the input step down tranny seems to me to be the easiest way to validate. Is this unreasonable or undoable?

Just my bleacher seat two cents worth.

[cHenriques]

very interesting, look more replications
http://www.conspirovniscience.com/forum/index.php?s=9852b32076335acd4e62d26f162bb149&showtopic=1031&st=60

[TinselKoala]

very interesting, look more replications
http://www.conspirovniscience.com/forum/index.php?s=9852b32076335acd4e62d26f162bb149&showtopic=1031&st=60

My French is rudimentary but the scopeshots and spreadsheet graphs are pretty revealing.

So... do _you_ think it is appropriate to start sampling at the zero of the outer envelope, and stop sampling at the next zero? Or would it be better to sample across several zeros of the outer envelope?

[cHenriques]

I only found and post that thread of that forum, you can try understand the google tradution http://translate.google.pt/translate?hl=pt-BR&sl=fr&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.conspirovniscience.com%2Fforum%2Findex.php%3Fs%3D88ee1858c05acd3c553bb25104b8d711%26showtopic%3D1031%26st%3D60

sampling across several zeros of outer envolepe would be better I think. The problem can be a sample rate issue But to prove if is or not OU I think that They must depart all scope tests, ligth and temperature, because there are high frequencies and harmonics and if is a flat bifilar tesla coil and with all the theory about this so very different effects can exist, the light different and the resistive load have a different temperature relationship.

So the closed loop must be tried like RomeroUK, use resistive load  more indutive, step it down, rectifiing in a capacitor and put it in the battery

best regards

[hartiberlin]

Gentlemen, please..,
Light and lumens as an indicator of overunity?
Let's do this the simple ( my level ) way by using a high amp hour battery connected to a 2kw inverter, feed the induction heater from its output, use the output coil(s) stepped down (transformer) bridge rectified output to loop back to the battery and see if there is a net gain or loss. If a net = or gain on the battery, then you really do have something. simple impedance matching from the output coil to the input step down tranny seems to me to be the easiest way to validate. Is this unreasonable or undoable?

Just my bleacher seat two cents worth.

Yes, that is the right way.
You can then also use a charged supercap to start the process and see, if the supercap will discharge or charge... !

If it will charge up, you have proven that the system  is overunity.