Welcome to Understanding Overunity!!!!!

[Dave45]

 

[TinselKoala]

I'm looking forward to seeing your demonstrations of these circuits and diagrams you are posting, Dave. Can you please give a link to your YouTube videos illustrating the effects you are diagramming?

[Dave45]

I added one to the diagram
Soon

[Dave45]

The zvs cannot be used, if opened up it goes into a runaway situation.
This setup cannot go into runaway because we control the input.

[wattsup]

@Dave45

Regarding the first circuit you posted, I have used that for driving several flyback types. The only hold-up is that it is a fixed circuit so no way to play around with a variable frequency. When someone publishes a fixed circuit but then includes a flyback coil or other coil type that can have so many variables, for sure you can run anything with this circuit and you will get a result as output, but there is nothing in there that indicates any advantage towards OU. You would have to use that fixed circuit and try 100 or so variations of coiling systems to achieve any serious results. Or, the publisher of the circuit must also indicate the full specs of how the coil is built, turns and winding directions, wire gauges, core model showing that the person has already done all the above variable checking to arrive at this particular circuit and coil. But a circuit just showing as it does is still light years away from any practical use, besides being a base for further R&D.

@TK

About your Royer circuit, I would ask you why you think the L1 coil is there. I think I know why but that would be jumping the gun since i wil be getting into that in the locked thread. I would be curious to know what your take on it is. Also, could you put a few words on the zeners. How do they function in that circuit? This would help @members here. Actually we would need one thread with dozens of sample circuits with explanations on zener usage.

About breaking rules, please feel at home here as I know your input is priceless. I read what you posted on the Solution vs Hoax thread but was too busy to post anything.

In the next thread I will open, it will call for simple bench tests that if you or other @members had time to do as an unbiased observer, this would help because for sure my own credibility is not high enough to put some weight on what I want to convey here. If you see anything that is not right, please correct us and I will make the changes in the main threads as warranted. Also, I may come back and disagree with your assessment and provide you with the reason(s) why and hopefully at that point it will be my way of possibly opening your eyes to some EE discrepancies, that may seem mundane or even misunderstood by myself and I will always accept that possibility. As long as the rebuttals are pertinent and logical, no problemo.

@Bob Smith

I wonder if there is a chronological chart or list of Tesla patents. I think if one would study that list and see where in that time line Tesla actually invented AC, we may be able to notice a DC progression that leads to the advent of AC. I would say that the Tesla bifilar patent came before the AC patent and that in the bifilar patent Tesla is basically showing one way to partially overcome some of the DC limitations in a coil that he then extended with his AC patent. I am sure Tesla realized that AC also had its limitations. I will get into that in the next thread as well because at the base, we all start from there. If you are off a few degrees, your trajectory changes and your landing point also changes. Just need a day or so to finalize the first thread start.

@all

We will be discussing enough about coils in the next thread and we will start simple, because I am convinced it is the sum of the simplest mistakes we make that push us away from OU. There has to be some checkmate conditions that we just do not realize are playing against us right from the start.

It's hard to explain in simple terms but just humor me for a minute. If all of the highest levels of intellectual activity in this world were controlled from a century before Tesla to today by those holding the money, arms and power, call them the Cabal, again just to humor me, then we cannot trust anything we have been taught. It is greater then possible that all technological activities that are controlled by a "national association" have in their midst people that are there only to control and limit the amount and type of academic learning that will be made available to the masses. We are part of that mass and have to consider that everything we have been taught in school is only a limited thin layer of truth mixed in with fallacies that both keep us functional in our specializations but crippled to expand beyond those limitations. So for me, you cannot trust anything in standard EE. Everything must be rehashed, re-examined and re-established in order to pull down the veil of ignorance we are living under. This may or may not be true, but there is no way we can take the chance. The only way is to start all over. I know this sounds crazy because it is easier to dismiss this as rampant paranoia, but let's just say our intellectual room is in a damn mess and some citizens need to tidy it up. That's what I hope these threads will help do. Put real information in a concentrated format that cannot be lost in 1000s of pages.

The ultimate answer is rather simple on how to fix this world of ours. It already occurred in the USA over 150 years ago when citizens were asked to vote in the first American referendum specifically asking that all Freemasons be banned from holding any positions of power. In those days, their numbers went from 30,000 to 5,000 but the remaining Freemasons hunkered down and went underground for years while the public just forgot about this hidden menace and their numbers thereafter have grown to about 1 million in the USA as we speak. So, if there was only one law to enforce today, it should be to remove anyone that is part of the Freemasons, 10th degree and above, or, anyone in any other secret societies that call for normal citizens to take oaths of allegiance to powers other then holding allegiance to ones nation.  Those holding any position of power in all spheres of activity including religions, meaning all of them would be fired and replaced with normal citizens of this world. Do that and this world will flourish with normal people. Keep these creeps in place and we are royally screwed as we will continue to live in a society run by highly demented and controlled individuals.

OK, ok, I know, let's cut the drama but it is so hard to ignore when t is so prevalent.

I think I have a  better idea for the first upcoming locked thread and companion thread.

I will start the locked thread and each paragraph will be numbered.

So you guys can then refer directly to the paragraph number or range when you make a suggestion to keep it, change it or remove it. We talk, we balance, we develop and undertake proof of concept experiments and then we decide and as this happens, the locked thread will change and evolve by consensus.

If someone wants to do the updates to the locked thread, let me know and I can ask @stefan to add you as moderator status for this group.

The end document would be a culmination of an OU multi-effort. But no distractions. I will remove anyone that wants to crap around. I won't let this fall because we and the guys coming after us need this now. We have to wake up. The way I see it is that we all need a wider base of knowledge that could never be rubbed away for the total transition to occur. The transition is from before OU to during OU transition (our time) to after OU (our grand-children). I don't give a damn if I do not discover OU. I would not mind finding it, but, I also know we need to know more about our coils and the juice mix and there are some things I have learned on my own that I think will interest smarter guys then me to make the transition a reality. That's all. This is all open source so no hiding around.

Yes I could do all this myself, but it would not mean anything. We need third party involvement and that means you. I will post here the first two simple experiments when I get back from work. If one or two @members. or more, can do these experiments and report their results, then there is no way anyone can accuse me or us of skewing the data.

wattsup