The Primer Fields - Breakthrough in our understanding of magnetism

[TechStuf]

Until someone can use some new model to fully explain all these things which have been engineered by understanding the "archaic" model, and in addition show how the new model predicts behaviour that the old model does not and these predictions are confirmed by experiment.... the "archaic" model is the proper one to use and to believe in.

Until...and until....

How about until one employs the empirical science skills of an 11 year old and simply places two ring magnets in opposition over a pencil.  Switch polarities and levitate one over the other again.  Voila!  They both levitate at the same height.  Of course with statements like these:

Why does the compass needle not show the pattern described by Crane, but rather the conventional pattern? Ditto iron filings or other ways of mapping field lines.... all show results that are consistent with Faraday and inconsistent with Crane or Davis or HoJo.

It is completely understandable how one could fail to grasp the significance of the rather elementary experiment I've outlined above.  But then it also seems obvious that you never bothered to watch the video at the beginning of this topic, or you would have seen a demonstration with your beholden compass needle proving that not all is as it appears as regards magnetic field dynamics.


TS

[gravityblock]

@gravock: If you are challenging conventional views it is up to you to explain how your preferred model is better, makes better predictions of known behaviour and predicts new behaviour that the old model does not, and is confirmed by experiment.

According to the authors of a publication titled, "Central Oscillator and Space-Quanta-Medium", their model does make better predictions of known behavior and does predict new behavior that the old model does not, and has been confirmed by experiments.

How do YOU explain MRI imagers, ion beam lithography, CRTs, electric motors of all kinds, magnetic compasses, magnetising jigs, bubble chambers, auroras,  using any of the "new" models? The behaviour of these systems and many many more are fully explained using the "ordinary" or "archaic" field model. The "archaic" model makes quite accurate mathematical predictions of very complex behaviour and is used all the time by people who actually make new things that work, in contrast to , eg, Howard Johnson.  Why does the compass needle not show the pattern described by Crane, but rather the conventional pattern? Ditto iron filings or other ways of mapping field lines.... all show results that are consistent with Faraday and inconsistent with Crane or Davis or HoJo.

Iron filings do show concentric rings as shown by the Ditchev-Experiment, which is consistent and explainable with Crane's model and inconsistent and unexplainable in the 'archaic' field models which predicts a radial field pattern.  Below is a snapshot of page 206 in the above publication describing the Ditchev experiment.  This experiment was published in the International Glasnost Journal of Fundamental Physics in 1992, by Hristo Ditchev.  In addition to this, the main video of this thread also reveals how the steel balls form concentric rings supporting Crane's model.  IMO, this publication is a must read and is quite relevant to this thread.

Gravock

[vrand]

According to the authors of a publication titled, "Central Oscillator and Space-Quanta-Medium", their model does make better predictions of known behavior and does predict new behavior that the old model does not, and has been confirmed by experiments.

Iron filings do show concentric rings as shown by the Ditchev-Experiment, which is consistent and explainable with Crane's model and inconsistent and unexplainable in the 'archaic' field models which predicts a radial field pattern.  Below is a snapshot of page 206 in the above publication describing the Ditchev experiment.  This experiment was published in the International Glasnost Journal of Fundamental Physics in 1992, by Hristo Ditchev.  In addition to this, the main video of this thread also reveals how the steel balls form concentric rings supporting Crane's model.  IMO, this publication is a must read and is quite relevant to this thread.

Gravock

Exactly, it is the experiment that changes the models.  Each new experiment revels new information.  When a device is created that can tap the aether/ether, orgone energy, infinite energy, whatever one wants to call it, and creates more energy output > input to power our homes and cars then the "models" will change again. 


Cheers

[DreamThinkBuild]

Hi All,

Does anybody have a backup of the video?

It's already gone.

[wideyed_tutank]

@DreamThinkBuild
Try again. It's still there.