Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Why overunity MUST be difficult or even impossible to replicate.

Started by pauldude000, February 05, 2013, 01:29:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Farmhand

Quote from: profitis on September 01, 2014, 12:14:50 PM
Woooooo @forest I feel sorry for you buddy.here's a challenge for you: prove to the audience that the MnO2-nickel-air profitis battery obeys the 2nd law of thermodynamics please.remember,it has about 3 times karpens original power density..

For a battery to be OU it must output more energy than is stored within all the material the battery is made from.
Proving anything to be OU is the job of the claimant.

..

profitis

@farmhand.proving that the laws of physics are still valid is the job of the disclaimant.you have to show how the cell dies out or how it extracts energy from chemical combustion.you will fail on all counts.your closed universe theory doesn't negate local negentropy phenomena

lancaIV

                                   fisia and physics:


Galaxis A to Galaxis B : B cannibalistic behaviour or copulating ? best worst case discussion
probably a help:
bioanalytics: fetus/baby in mother body behaviour: cannibalistic !


S
  OCWL


poste scriptum I : "cell dies out ": bio-watch ? +/- 40 cell recuperation phases : then midlife-crisis
                                                                              1 cell phase : 9 months   

p.s.II : Thank you,"GOD junior"(written: GOD   spoken: IOS or YOS ; phonetic ! ):
  The Universe is a closed system and logically the conservation of energy applies to it.
                                 

But in my "Goetterwelten"(with myriad of GODs) there is the existence of many universums,summa summarum.
                            Das Wort ist heilig         
                            Das LOGOS ist heilig
                            LOGOS~Crisis~Deo Criste                 crisam
                            Der Kreis ist heilig
                                     rise

                            Pi- or Py-tagoras , Pi-or Py-ramid student,Hellenismus ,
                            + Konzil von Nicaae


                           classical Hellenismus: nonplusultra     "FORMAT"
                           modern :                                          In-FORMAT-ik


                                                  procedere,process:

    in dubio ?                         pro reo !                de advocato angelii (gen.) or advocato diabolii(gen.)
       doubt                                  Offen/Bar-Legung 
       duvida Kyrill : b~v               Testimonial
      Zweifel


                          Messias,written      Mahdi,written       spoken ? phonetic laws ?
                                                         Messi,F.C.Barcelona

                                              fatum,Schicksal,Kismet written :
                                    f.e. (K)isme(t) spoken
                                  but not in anglo-saxonical kind :like  'Aesme'  in saxonic phonetics : 'isme'


                                  mater(maé),matrem,matre
                                  mother
                                  Mutter
                                  Madre De IOS        Madre D'IOS      Madre Dios     
                                  Madre DE AEOS      Madre D'AEOS   Madre DAEOS ~Madredeus


                                  Asia translated: Orient  Europe: Okzident

                                                   The O is holy  ::) 
                                                   The A 'l`co-holy ? ;)

                                           Europe: Marien=Madredeus-Kult
http://recognoscere.wordpress.com/2012/06/08/die-bedeutung-und-der-ursprung-der-europaflagge/
                http://fatima.ch/1987/10/maria-und-europa-uber-den-ursprung-der-eu-flagge/


                          Fatima/Ourém :      http://www.holymary.info/howfatimacametobe.html


                                         From   holyfisia,Olymp to holymary


                                                     logos and ratio/racio

Farmhand

Quote from: profitis on September 01, 2014, 05:23:22 PM
@farmhand.proving that the laws of physics are still valid is the job of the disclaimant.you have to show how the cell dies out or how it extracts energy from chemical combustion.you will fail on all counts.your closed universe theory doesn't negate local negentropy phenomena

Well I'm not trying to prove the Laws of physics are still valid. I am stating logic. And logic agrees with some of the "Laws" of Physics.
You are the one who is claiming the Laws are not valid but do not say which ones. I simply stated the Universe is everything and
it is the only truly closed system. Also that a battery is made from materials that contain stored energy, if the battery is physically
changed by the output of energy then the questions must be asked.

1) How much energy is stored in the materials of the battery ?

2) How much of the battery is being transformed into output ?

3) What is the difference between the two values if 2) is subtracted from 1) ?

4) Is there energy dissipated as waste heat or radiations ?

5) When 4) is added to 3) and 2) does it exceed 1) ?

..

MarkE

Profitis, given premise A that is well evidenced and claim A' that contradicts A and is not previously well evidenced, it should be obvious where the burden in any debate of A versus A' lies.