Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[nat1971a]

Hi All,

I hope this post clears a few things up. I have attached a drawing which represents the electrical transformer as described in patent 593 138 "Electrical Transformer". So in patent 464666 electro magnetic motor there are "6" electrical transformers with two sections.

Refer to patent 593 138 electrical transformer, on the 2nd page of the text b/w 11-19.

He states that "In practice for apparatus designed for ordinary use the coil is preferably constructed....in two sections, so as to constitute really two secondaries".

So if one ignores the figure 3 diagram in patent 593 138 and think of it conceptually from the text then we have a primary and a secondary (represented by Pole A) on one coil and a second secondary on the other coil to the right (represented by pole B).

He mentions also in patent 464,666 line 95 "a current-impulse induced from the primary coil E imparts the same magnetism to the poles B as that produced in poles A by the primary impulse. This confirms this view point!

Also as previously stated in other posts the condenser (capacitor) is tuned to "so as to cause  the currents to pass through it to differ from the primary currents by a quarter phase"(reference 464666 line 55-60). As I stated in my earlier posts the quarter phase represents the point of no attraction and no repulsion. i.e resonates with the void (neutral point) - the point of stillness.

So I will also highlight that the coils are highly likely configured in the next attachment which cant be confirmed as he conveniently neglects to tell us the configuration in most of his patents NSNSNSNSNSNS. Creating a neutral ring of coils. Mind you it would be much easier to replace these with magnets configured the same way (as described in my earlier posts)

Regards,

N.

[nat1971a]

Sorry please find attached a better picture of the coil arrangement

[brnbrade]

I redraw a pictures.   

[Charlie_V]

Also as previously stated in other posts the condenser (capacitor) is tuned to "so as to cause  the currents to pass through it to differ from the primary currents by a quarter phase"(reference 464666 line 55-60). As I stated in my earlier posts the quarter phase represents the point of no attraction and no repulsion. i.e resonates with the void (neutral point) - the point of stillness.

nat1971a,
The part I bolded is also referred to reactive power - in electrical engineering terms.  Pretty cool stuff if you ask me!  I wasn't really paying close attention to patent 593,138, good correlation you found nat.  But in patent 593,138, aren't the primaries wrapped around the secondaries?  In 464,666 it is the secondary wrapped around the primary.  I wonder if this makes a difference? 


Good Job brnbrade, I like those pictures.  What program did you use?  Paintshop? 

[barbosi]

Also as previously stated in other posts the condenser (capacitor) is tuned to "so as to cause  the currents to pass through it to differ from the primary currents by a quarter phase"(reference 464666 line 55-60). As I stated in my earlier posts the quarter phase represents the point of no attraction and no repulsion. i.e resonates with the void (neutral point) - the point of stillness.

nat1971a,
The part I bolded is also referred to reactive power - in electrical engineering terms.  Pretty cool stuff if you ask me!  I wasn't really paying close attention to patent 593,138, good correlation you found nat.  But in patent 593,138, aren't the primaries wrapped around the secondaries?  In 464,666 it is the secondary wrapped around the primary.  I wonder if this makes a difference? 


Good Job brnbrade, I like those pictures.  What program did you use?  Paintshop? 

Charlie, nat,

As long the energy transfer is done by induction means, I don't think it makes any difference which coils is at "inside" or "outside". I consider coils nothing more than "concentrators" of [electro]magnetic field. Much like magnifier glass. Now if you consider the windings of 2 coupled coils unwrapped to form 2 straight lines, these are still coupled and energy transfer still exist. In this last case, there is no coil "inside" nor "outside". One would argue this is not magnetic coupling, but rather capacitive. If you accept there is no electric current with its magnetic effect and instead there is only electromagnetic field, then how energy transfer is achieved is not relevant anymore. However this last statement has to be proved.

Another one: I find amazing how reactive power with its real/observable effects is based on "imaginary number" (i). Its is not a real number, doesn't give a direction or a measure of anything and yet it defines rotation/twist/torque moment.

And the last one (for now): I read about equivalence between rotor coils and magnets and I don't get it. Are the coils like in attached picture from pat# 416194? In other words, the North and South poles are radial or circular oriented? I've seen two posted pictures that seem to contradict each other.

Thanks.