Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[allcanadian]

I think Tesla mastered these complex electrical systems with analogies and thought experiments. Everyone wants to complicate these patents and machines with complex terminology and fantasy particles and dimensions, Tesla was the master at reductionism, a trick I find very helpfull.
Here is an example-
Tesla uses the spring and mass arrangement to decribe LC oscillating circuits.
He states that if a mass on the end of a spring is moved initially, the mass will oscillate up and down with a known period of oscillation, the period is dampened and will eventually to come to rest.
He states that the pliability of the spring is equivalent to Capacity in an LC circuit.
He states that the mass or weight attached to the spring is equivalent to the Inductance of an LC circuit.

What Tesla also states is that he can change Capacity and Inductance of a circuit at will, which we have yet to understand.
So with the spring and mass analogy, changing Capacitance would constitute changing the hardness of the spring, changing Inductance would constitute changing the mass.
So, here is a thought experiment for you
What if I softened the spring by heating it on the down stroke and cooled the spring contracting it on the upswing?   
The frequency and power would increase, not dampen.
If the springs pliability(hardness) is equivalent to Capacity then a changing capacity would drive an oscillating circuit.
For years experimenters have been playing with changing inductance on the fly in an LC circuit, these are called "parametric oscillators".
I think Tesla was changing the Capacitance of the circuit on the fly with electrostatic forces, the only true forces.

Here's another simple thought experiment, we assume voltage is pressure and current is flow, the voltage pressure pushes the current flow through the circuit.We all know pressure produces heat and resistence to flow.
So what would happen if there was no pressure but only suction, a negative pressure(voltage) PULLING the flow along, and maybe this negative region could be one quarter wavelength ahead of the flow(current). Tesla makes more than enough reference to maximum voltage in one phase versus minimum voltage in the other phase to justify this line of thought.

So here is a problem, we make too many assumptions and when confronted with a problem we fabricate all sorts of fantastical, non-sensical realms, particles, and properties to explain what is in reality very simple- like nature.

Victor Schauberger said " Do the opposite of what we do today and you will be well on your way"
Think pull not push, cold not hot, suction not pressure.

I think Im getting close to nailing this , but first Teslas concepts need to be applied to his patents and erfinders machine. All this speculation is fine and dandy but we need to drag this into reality, to have a solid explanation of what is happening.

Tonight Im going to re-read teslas patents, If you read all the patents as a time line they have a defined direction he is heading, and he really does spell everything out if you pay attention to the basics. A few days ago I spent 7 hours a day over 3 days reading all his patents in detail and everthing was fresh in my mind and made perfect sense, then I posted what I found--- then it disappeared. So Im at square one again, such is life, hopefully I can post tonight on what I think tesla discovered.

[Grumpy]

Efinder wore: Magneto-Dielectric Energy!  Where magnetism is static, and electricity is characterized as a high potential high frequency field, which moves inward (implosion) and outward (explosion) simultaneously!

This describes a longitudinal wave.

Eric dollard uses this term "Magneto-dielectric energy".

Here is Eric Dollard on the "Four Quadrant Theory of Electricity"
(from Functional Thinking)
E:If we take Tesla's three phase electricity, or rotating magnetic field, we find that it is based on the archetypal form known as the Solar cross or by various other names.
T: Mandalas, medicine wheels?
E: ...these are four quadrant types of forms, a balanced cross as opposed to an unbalanced cross.
T: This is where you get the Four quadrant Theory of Electricity?
E: Electricity has to be viewed from a four quadrant type of situation. The right angle plays an extremely fundamental role in electricity. It is generally a right angle phenomenon.


(from Tesla's Longitudinal Electricity video):
Tesla experimented with impulse current and oscillating current.
our electricity is direct current and alternating current.
The Four Quadrant Theory of Electricity is
IMPULSE CURRENT, OSCILLATING CURRENT, DIRECT CURRENT, ALTERNATING CURRENT.
alternating current + direct current are transverse electromagnetic
impulse and oscillating current are longitudinal di-electric

Above taken from: http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Eric_Dollard

Oscillating current equates to longitudinal - (alternating current is transverse).

More from Eric Dollard:
http://www.borderlands.com/archives/arch/capacit.htm

http://www.borderlands.com/archives/arch/fallacy.htm

Wilbert B. Smith's book "The New Science" explains this all very well - including the four quadrant theory which he termed "quadrature". (He died of cancer before he finished it.)
http://www.rexresearch.com/smith/newsci~1.htm

Combine the above with Dave Lowrance's site ( http://magnetism.fateback.com/ )and you will see the universe in an entirely different way.

One last thing - information manifests itself differently to different people.  Study and you may very well create devices that work the same as those of Tesla, Erfinder and others, but do not surprised if it does not make perfect sense to others.

[brnbrade]

The solid state Tesla pump DC

An device of the static corrent pump

[nat1971a]

Hi All,

Where do I start......hmmm

For anyone wanting further reading I will list some references.

I think this will help in understanding what is going on. It has become apparent that the motor patents prior to 464,666 are pretty much based on the same concept. i.e to build a motor with a phase difference. So we should be able to get a better understanding of what he was doing by reading the prior motor patents. e.g.455067
He does appear to going into a little more detail in the other patents.

Also I was searching for an article called "rotazioni elettrodynamiche" by Ferraris G (because he came out with a similar motor to Tesla just a few years after Tesla did - i was wondering if he explained it better) but I havent been able to find the article. But it did lead me to a patent that lists all the references in the Tesla lectures (about the motor) for us. Convenient I must say.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20060238148.html

The references start in the patent at [0020] to [0029]

And they refer to the "Nikola Tesla, lectures, patents & articles" book.

Regards,

N.

[nat1971a]

Hi again,

In patent 455067 line85 he states

"Hence whatever tends to decrease the self induction and increase the current in the induced (secondary) circuit will other things being equal, increase the output and efficiency of the motor".

This is an important point as he highlights what he trying to do in the circuit. He continues on to say in patent 455067 line 37 " I increase the resistance in the circuit of the secondary and reduce as much as practicable its self induction" i.e smaller diameter wire or artifical resistance.

He also says "The condenser will overcome or counteract to a greater or less degree the effects of such induction" p455067 line 41.

Then "a capacitor stores energy in the form of an electrostatic field". Reference was from a third party.

And this connects with what Erfinder said about electrostatic fields being used in the circuit.

Regards,

N.