Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[allcanadian]

@barbosi
Your right, how do we keep missing this stuff? good work
I found some stuff by walter russel that explains where were at as well.

* Positive electricity is the generative electricity.

Positive electricity is that state of motion in which electricity dominates magnetism.

Positive electricity is that state of motion in which centripetal force dominates centrifugal force.

* Negative electricity is the radiative energy.

Negative electricity is that state of motion in which magnetism dominates electricity.

Negative electricity is that state of motion in which centrifugal forcer dominates centripetal force.

* Electricity and magnetism exist as separate appearances only when opposed. In non-opposition they disappear, they become one.

* Electricity and magnetism are not two separate forces, nor are they two separate substances. They are merely two different dimensions of motion. They belong solely to motion and not to substance.

* Neither are positive and negative electricity two kinds of electricity. Positive and negative electricity are but two differing potential?s of the same force which must move in opposite directions.

[z_p_e]

Sorry for jumping in here guys, I only read the first page of this thread, and would like to comment on the original file presented here named "Free_Energy_Plans.pdf".

I believe I may have an explanation for the apparent "free energy" obtained from the capacitor/motor experiment in this document. It's actually quite simple, but perhaps not so obvious.

Bottom line is, there is no free energy in this circuit, but there is "lost energy", and degrees thereof.

So we have two caps, one discharged into the other through a DC motor. There is an apparent 50% "gain" in motor run time when powering the motor via the 3 separate discharges compared to the single discharge from one cap.

Actually, there is only an energy loss when running the motor off the single cap, and this loss is more extreme versus the 3 separate discharge scenario.

Here's why. The DC motor consists of a coil with a relatively high resistance of 1k or so. Power is dissipated (lost) in this DC resistance, and the amount of power lost is proportional to V^2. It doesn't matter what the resistance is really, it's still proportional to V-squared.

In the first scenario, the motor is powered from say 10V on the cap. The cap is 10V, and GND is 0V. That's a 10V potential difference.

In the second scenario, the motor is powered 2 times from a potential difference of 5V, and one time from a potential difference of approximately 5V or so (one cap discharging from 10V to 5V, while the other charges from 0V to 5V).

Because of the square function of power loss wrt voltage, the first scenario dissipates (loses) 4 times the power in heat compared to any of the other 3 discharges.

So in conclusion, I will say that by using a DC motor with 1/4 the DC coil resistance, but the same inductance, and powering from a single cap charged to 10V, the run time will be 50% greater as well, compared to the original motor.

There is no ou here, it is simply seeing the results of one motor being more efficient than the other, OR driving the same motor in a more efficient manner compared to the other.

Darren

[allcanadian]

WOW now Im starting to understand how erfinder feels!
z_p_e you may as well be speaking japanese, I feel like I have come a million miles from where your at, and I have barely moved an inch.

You may want to read the rest of this thread.

[z_p_e]

AllCanadian,

I have read the bulk of posts here, and clearly the topic has shifted to something quite different from the original file and concept I commented on above. Perhaps you could go back and read this original document if you have forgotten. I have not seen (and still not seen one in this thread) an explanation offered for the apparent "gain" described in this original document, so I offered one.

One last comment: The Tesla patent being referred to here (464666) and used as the basis for Erfinder's device, appears as though it is being mis-interpreted. Tesla's motor is driven by sinusoidal AC, not pulses. Tesla found an ingenious way of developing a 90? phase shift from a single phase source, using a relatively small value, high voltage capacitor, all for the purpose of creating the required RMF.

Again, sorry for the intrusion...graciously bowing out now.

Darren

[Trump]