Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[wattsup]

Thinking about ERfinders' circuit "correction_image_2.jpg" (page 15), I was wondering how to do this same circuit without actually making the core and rotor, etc.

So I took out and old .5pf 2000vdc cap, a 12vdc 7 amp battery, four identical primary 110vac to whatever single or dual secondary transformers, one on/off push switch and made the following set-up.

If anyone else can try this, I am getting some wierd reading on the voltmeter. In fact, voltage is going up even with the circuit left open.

I have a TV in the same room and when I push the switch, I am getting major static on the TV screen. If fact, the same static is also seen in the upstairs TV. Never seen that before. Something is definitely going on.

Just thought I'd shoot it out there.

[Trump]

A little more food for thought.

We live between a very big two plate capacitor. The  Earth and the Ionosphere. The Ionosphere is negatively charged by the particles from the Sun. The Earth is neutral charged. The voltage difference is several million volt. Between an antenna and ground
there is always a negative charge. The higher the antenna, the higher the voltage. 
So, if you put up a antenna and put a high voltage capacitor between the antenna and ground, the capacitor will charge up to high voltage. When the voltage is high enough you can use a spark gap (very close gap) and discharge that capacitor into a transformer that has a lot of turns at the capacitor side and few turns on the other side. On the output of the transformer you put a diode bridge. The diode bridge is  connected to a lead acid battery. The battery will charge.

PS: wattsup Nice posting, hopefully some people will mimic what you have going so we can start to see how this stuff really works. I have a couple of transformers, but they are kind of big mothers out of a microwave ,that may not be good for this test. Maybe something from Radio Shack may be better, would you recommend getting  about 4 or 6 of them to try?

OH,  has anyone seen Erfinder? have not seen him on in awhile?


Trump
                                                                     I

[wattsup]

I made a mistake. The secondary side is identified as primary and vis-versa. Here is the corrected one.

@Trump

Actually, I am using 4 different transformers, all in the 110 vac input with varying AC outputs. One is even a toroid (transformer #1). I just grabbed whatever I had. Notice that trans #1 and #3 don't have the primary connected. This set-up actually reproduces the circuit without the rotor. Also the center of each secondary is not connected so you are using the full secondary windings. I think the best choice of transformer would be any unit having the same input and output voltages. That way the coil weight would have to be closly weighted. Please note that this set-up is not reproducing ERfinders' weight ratio between the primary (large wire by weight) and secondary length. Also it is not making the 3240 iterations per minute. But this could be done electronically. Just to test.

[allcanadian]

Hello
From the moment our jouney began I had a nagging question I just could not let go, one we have all seen. And seems very relevant.

"Positive charge attracts positive charge, and expels negative discharge.  Negative discharge repels both negative discharge and positive charge."

Positive Charge = Paramagnetism = EMF
Negative Discharge = Diamagnetism = BEMF

Positive charge attracts positive charge(like attracts like) , this must be true or no matter would gravitate towards other matter, forming elements. "and expels negative discharge"--charging and discharging are opposite conditions and must repel, this seems obvious.
But here is something different-
"Negative discharge repels both negative discharge and positive charge."
A negative discharge must repel a negative discharge because a discharge can be seen as an action, charge- discharge(one cycle), in order to discharge something it must first be charged, there can be no discharge-discharge.
Negative discharge repels positive charge, again like attracts like, charging and discharging are opposite conditions(actions) and must repel.

Now here is where it gets really cool-
We have a battery(12v car battery), we have always assumed the positive flows to the negative and is neutralized. I have come to see this as all backwards, and it makes no sense. Like attracts like!
If positive charge leaves the battery, and never becomes a negative discharge(Bemf)it's opposite, then it would seem that the positive charge should return to the battery and void itself, not neutralize but cease to be. So we have to keep recharging the source, over and over. But what if a negative discharge was applied to the battery, a discharging action leads to a charging action leading to a discharging action in a cyclical nature. So the positive charge source never voids itself it cycles back and forth--charge--discharge--charge--discharge, like a capacitor using potential difference not current. In this case we would have alternating potentials which may not void. Like ringing a bell in a vacuum, it goes on and on, just because you can't hear it doesn't mean it's not happening.

What Im saying is that a negative discharge on the negative terminal seems no different that a charging action on the positive terminal. And all these motors appear to use a DC source Hmmm

[orosado]

Hello,

I am here, I have not commented because I am not impressed!  What happened to the patents, I was under the impression that they were the subject matter.  Focus, and discipline of self....If you want truth, you have to control yourselves, stick to the patents.  I told you all if you cannot comprehend those basic patents, you cannot move forward with this technology.  I cannot, nor will I teach Tesla's technology, only he can do that!!!  If I understand them, and did so of my own power, you can do the same!


PATENTS!!!  In your philosophical discussions, please try not to forget the PATENTS!!!


Regards

Hello Erfinder,

I could not agree more. It is very easy to go in tangents and get lost. I do it all the time.

I printed the four Tesla patents and I carry them everywhere I go. Everytime I have the chance, I read them and try to understand them. This way at least, even if I do not have a computer near me, I can study the patents.

I got my patents from Pat2Pdf.org as the resolution of the PDF is better than using the Keely website PDFs. I have not explored the possibility of printing the pages directly from the TIFF viewer required by the US Patents website, but I estimate that the resolution should be similar than the Pat2Pdf.org website.

Regards,
Omar