Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[barbosi]

Erfinder2,
Thanks for sharing with us your knowledge.
I guess it's up to us how to put together separate pieces of the puzzle to form a SIMPLE construct (read UNITY). This is what I hope and I was looking for years.

It's in our will to share with eachother what we'll find: simple, obvious (read truth) and I hope all this effort not to go in vain.

I whish you didn't stop writing at post no. 13, you know is not good for the morale, but hey, let's not get distracted.

Thanks for stoping by and sharing this message of hope.

[barbosi]

The similarity is striking (24 pole)

[Charlie_V]

I agree Grumpy, I think there is something to this circuit design.  I've been trying to contact Jon, but he hasn't responded yet.  He just became a father so I'm sure he's been busy.

Those magnets will not form a closed loop when connected - I tested it.  It creates an "Axial, Multi-poles" configuration as shown in ResinRat2's diagram.  This makes me wonder what Erfinder's definition of "closed loop" was.  Its hard to follow someone who uses "ancient" measuring systems and personalized terminology!

[barbosi]

...  This makes me wonder what Erfinder's definition of "closed loop" was. 

In Reply #93 on: February 21, 2007, 01:15:49 AM, Concept_Device.jpg, Erfinder2 shows the magnet field distribution (top-right drawing).

Also in Reply #86 on: February 18, 2007, 08:14:35 AM, he said.

Ironhead (Thanks Ironhead) provided a wonderful link where you can get an idea of what the ring should look like.

http://www.engconcepts.net/List_Of_Neodymium_Horseshoe_Magnets.asp

Just remember you need 4 magnets no more no less in this machine, at this point!

I hope not the magnets supplier is the main concern now, but rather to grasp the concept.

Regards.

[Grumpy]

Stick with the curved bar arrangement.  This is a well-known way to trap the magnetic flux and free the A-field.

6" OD and 2" id - no thickness specified but 2" would make the cross section square - damn big hunk of metal.