Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[nat1971a]

http://www.svpvril.com/Cosmology/cos9.html
Reference

[barbosi]

http://www.svpvril.com/Cosmology/cos9.html
Reference

Thanks Nat, this and Keelys' diagram inspired me and made the click.
I was looking for a graphical representation of vortexes in a magnet and I didn't see the diagram as a conceptual drawing. Is a diagram with Mind's operating process. What I was looking for was like to visualize someone's faith and asking  to draw it . Or drawing how you invent a thing then how you relax and enjoy the creation.
This is how Mind works people! Remember, Mind = the only substance...?

[nat1971a]

Barbosi,

No problem. It is very important that everyone understands the concepts otherwise this knowledge will become lost again.

Cheers

N.

[DanC]

d

[Maximumgravity1]

Regarding ERFINDER's attachment of Russell's drawing.   Am I missing the point?  Isn't this a representation of the earth?  Isn't this discussing how the "flux" (gotta find a better word) flows into, around, and about the poles and the equator?  I notice many references to the earth - the Tropic of Cancer, and the Tropic of Capricorn.  These are the bounding lines in the middle.

Of particular interest is the detail that is hard to see.  He has identified the Radius of the East - West Vortices as being 23? 27' 9".  I am not entirely sure of the significance of this radius, but it is eerily close to the 23.5" tilt of the earth on its axis.  Interestingly this measurement occurs along the horizontal, but with gyroscopic precession, I can see this being translated into a longitudinal tilt.  I found that the official term is obliquity of the ecliptic, and is officially 23? 27' 8.26".  SO I presume that is the significance of the radius - LOL....
Closer examination revealed one Radii to be written as 23? 27' 8" and the other as 23? 27' 9".  Interestingly enough, they switch positions from east to west vortex.

Also, in looking at the radius of the North - South vortices, it appears to be 20" (seconds).  It could be 20?, but the graphic is so compressed, it is hard to tell.  I am thinking the 20? makes more sense, as this might account for Magnetic Variation, and correspond to the "wandering" of Magnetic North.  In a quick search, the closest I could find was a 537km discrepancy between True and Magnetic North (another site stated 5? 40" in 1994 in the UK).  I found 1 degree = 69 miles, 1 minute = 1.15 miles and 1 second = 0.02 miles (just over 100 feet) - http://nationalatlas.gov/articles/mapping/a_latlong.html
By my rough addition, 5? 40" = 391 miles - or 629.25ish km.  So that again seems a pretty strange coincidence.

Moreover, in his notes, there are many Celestial references. Among these are the Oblateness of the earth, the correlation to a true sphere and its poles aligning with the axis of rotation, or the equator aligning with the Ecliptic.  Since there is an "Ecliptic Expansion" marked on the diagram.  This Link leads me to believe that this is Corona Discharge and and Borealis Displays.

Lastly, in looking at the lines of flux, it appears that these are in orbit around a sphere.  The fact that all the lines say "South by way of West" is confusing, but I assume it details South Magnets, flowing westward.  In short - the "discharge" that Russell details is equivalent to what ERFINDER quoted prior:

"Positive charge attracts positive charge and expels negative discharge..."

As we see the only opposition to this labeled as "North by way of East" on the southern vortex.  But now I am confused as to what the North and South pole really are, and are they attracting or repelling "positive" or "negative" magnets?  Is there even really such a thing?  Are there really charges, or just opposite flows?

Time to go ponder this....