The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?

[gravityblock]

Biggest proof yet regarding the origin of Gravity!

Gravock

[derekwillstar]

Biggest proof yet regarding the origin of Gravity!

Gravock

Thanks for the link


Perfectly agree that gravity is a push!
but in addition
Gravity is the force resulting from the rapid pushing force (descending from the sun) and the slowest of repulsion (the sun ascending from the center of the earth).


http://www.fortunadrago.it/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/vtanim2.gif


the speed difference between the two flows is the gravity (the flow is dominant pushing from the sun, while the one coming from the center of the earth, balance and compensates the gravity).


http://peswiki.com/images/c/ce/Ed_Leedskalnin-pushpull.gif


In the example of the link there is a pendulum, that is correct, as it is correct that the pendulum has a foothold!


So if we are pushed, the fulcrum, is the sun, in the case that we are repelled, the fulcrum is the center of the earth.
This means that the earth is firmly locked between these two forces.
the planet does not move!
that moves is just everything we see, the light carried by the flow of monopolar energy from the sun (spiral vortex)! http://www.fortunadrago.it/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Chamber-Nautilus-cosmos-Eso.jpg


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQ-TSGmT5Jk


Ultimately, the nature does not move planetary masses, but only the energy.
So that everything we see (the alternation of day and night) is just a wonderful deception!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saOy8PzSg7M


P.S.
A delicate child (the creation) to sit still would put in a safe place, or on a fast running ferrari without a pilot?

[derekwillstar]

I in fact know who was the originator of the video. But as you can see from any video with a bright pattern like the yellow mat he used under the device that it causes pixilation errors in the video due to the digital transform process. It is a sort of matrixing even that happen to edges of dark with bright patterned backgrounds. matrixing is a product of those patterns when converting one resolution to the next. In fact most video cards have a driver based algorythem that deals with this problem on a hardware level. Antialiasing is this algorythem.


It is a well know effect and There is a fix for it but only in the video hardware. Since YouTube is come of age it still has not dealt with this issue and most video cameras do not deal with it as well. If this would happen with an analogue video camera I would be inclined to look into it but it doesn't. matrixing is a digital effect and not an analogue one.


As for gravity what does this have to do with it? A magnetic field has nothing to do with gravity. It is the effect of the electric field on space and matter. First you need the potential field and then expose matter to the field and then you get a current, which we call magnetic current. Without the electric field there is no current and hence no magnetic field.

http://peswiki.com/images/c/ce/Ed_Leedskalnin-pushpull.gif

If you want to understand gravity one needs to understand the electric field and how it interacts with matter to create a pull towards the center of the mass. If you look at the periodic table you will see that all matter has a standing potential or commonly called electro negativity. lets look at copper for instance: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper

all of nature is monopolar magnetic matter (know the magnetic toy "geomag"? behold, the matter is made that way, and accurately...
Edward Leedskalnin indicates an atom of matter as its model of PMH :

Those free circulating north and south individual magnets are the building material for the magnet metal we find in the earth. This should show that the north and south pole individual magnets are the real atom builders, and not the protons and electrons.  I think the north and south pole individual magnets are running in an orbit around a common core in an atom the same way as they run in an orbit around a common core in the perpetual motion holder that I made. The only difference is that an atom has a small orbit, but the perpetual motion holder has a big orbit.

   

    I have never seen an atom, but I think the atom drawings are wrong. They should be drawn to fit the earth on account of the fact that the atom is a part of the earth. The earth has two magnet poles. This means that each pole has an equal pull and push to hold the earth together, and so each atom should be built as it could have two poles. In that case both forces that make magnet poles should run around a common core (the core



could be a particle of sunlight)

http://www.fortunadrago.it/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/PMH_MVAL_op_488x600.jpg

If we understand that masses the size of our planet actually have a distance associated with it and an additive potential as well. The surface of the planet would have a value associated with it and is concentrated inside of the planet into the core. Since there is heavy iron at the core this electric potential becomes active and changes a portion of the electrical potential of the whole of the planet into a magnetic, heat, and gravity components.

None of this would be possible without the electric field and the potential of the matter in that electric field. Each body in space is additive to the whole scale of the body in space. This is not limited to solid bodies, it also includes the solar system and galaxy as well. This is how gravity works plain and simple.

electricity is a magnetic current


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SO3dXCsyBC4

[gravityblock]

 

Thanks -- this vid is also interesting, an alka-seltzer tablet added to a water droplet in microgravity.  Note his comment about larger air bubbles forming at times in the droplet, sometimes at the poles, once evidently in the center.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgC-ocnTTto

I suppose that the earth itself was once molten, a large liquid "droplet" in space, in "microgravity" conditions.

(This does not PROVE anything regarding the earth, but shows what may be possible in such conditions.)

Yes, the earth itself was once molten, but what was it before it was a large liquid "droplet" in space?  It was a sun of course (glowing ball of magnetism with no crust).  In other words, the earth is a dying sun.  A sun, under the right conditions will start to form a crust. A sun, on becoming an earth, will form a point of inequality in space at a distance equal to the square of it's diameter.  At this point of inequality in space, a new sun of greater or lesser magnitude may be formed.  This would depend on the curvature form of the sun's field at the time it was forming a crust.  The particular form of magnetic concentration at the time when the sun is forming a crust may form a new sun or other variant forms as classified by astronomers.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

"Helical Helix: Solar System a Dynamic Process", by Dr. Pallathadka Keshava Bhat, is a proposed model for the solar system with hard scientific evidence and data to support it.

Gravock