Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Tesla's "COIL FOR ELECTRO-MAGNETS".

Started by Farmhand, April 21, 2013, 09:00:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

Synchro1:

There is no need to worry about 7.8 Hz or any harmonics of 7.8 Hz.  The whole thing is a red herring.  My suggestion to you is to take one of your bigger coils and find a decent-sized non-polarized capacitor and do some experiments with resonance and find out for yourself.

I am willing to bet you that in almost every "delayed Lenz effect" clip you find on YouTube the real explanation for the acceleration under load is because the power draw of the coil goes down when you add the load resistor and that reduces the load on the prime mover and as a result the rotor speeds up.  It's just one of those follies in the realm of free energy.  How many amateur experimenters have you seen measure the total coil power dissipation before and after adding the load resistor?

For your "self accelerating reed switch magnet spinner" the same type of investigation should be done.  In all likelihood, the same principle will apply and you will find out that the speed increases for the same reason.

MileHigh

synchro1

The issue is amplifying magnetic field oscillation in a permanent magnet output coil core by coupling rotor resonance and LC tank resonance, not DLE.


The oscillating frequency of the magnet core can be determined easily by test pulsing if the 7.8 common denominator proves to be ineffectual. Once the resonant frequency of the magnets is established, the frequency of the output coil LC tank can be established along with the rotor RPM. 


Getting the output coil magnet core field flux to agitate generates copious output. Conradelektro needs to return to his testing of the "Synchro coil" with these worthwhile goals in view.  

MileHigh

The magnets that you play with on your bench don't have a resonant frequency.  Your clip with the virtual compass needle oscillating is essentially showing you mechanical resonance between a mass and an invisible magnetic spring.

If you have a scope then you can try out your theories.  If you execute and measure properly then we can look at your data.

synchro1


@Milehigh,

We started out positioning the stack of diametric ring magnets in adjacency to the spinning rotor explicitly to experience the flutter that Conradelektro reported. Look at the "Dancing magnets" video again. You see increased oscillation visibly there.


The "Synchro coil" Conradelektro overwound doesn't collect any flux in the outer wraps from those magnets buried deep inside the core. First of all, he reduced the rotor speed below the frequency that produced the essential "Flutter" oscillation from the excessive Lenz drag on his flimsy darning needle rotor due to the overly thick windings. I instructed him to connect a 100uf electrolytic capacitor to a lightly wrapped coil in the 4uH range, a tenth of the thickness, which would have yielded an LC tank frequency of 7.8.


Conradelektro needs to repeat the "FLUTTER TEST", then determine the actual rotor speed on his new set up. Next, he needs to strip around 25uH of wire off the coil. We can move forward with the necessary alterations from that point toward a successful and fulfilling conclusion to this experiment.    


The other question is, who hired you on as Conradelektro's nanny?

synchro1


@Milehigh,


This is a quote from Conradelektro. His rotor speed was 2500 RPM when he got the rattling effect. This was a "MAGNETIC RESONANCE EFFECT". He awarded me a badge for discovering it:

"I just held 6 diametrically magnetised ring magnets (stuck together) near the spinning magnet. They also rattle (all of them) and I have to stay a bit further away from the spinning magnet than with only two ring magnets between my fingers (in order not to slow the spinning magnet down)".


320 X 7.8 = 2500! That would require an LC tank frequency of approximately 40 hertz. An electrolytic capacitor of 4.6563e+5   Microfarad's would bring his 34uH "Synchro coil" into resonace at that RPM.



@Milehigh,


Just a note on the personal side. The fact that you would boldly deny even so much as the existence of something so commonly recognized as "Magnetic Resonance" is one more example of your chronic and egregious "befuddelry".  You are an arrogant free energy supressionist, and I deeply resent your persistent undermining of anything worthwhile on this community web site. You are a bane to everyone sincere about advancing free energy, and should be thrown off this web site entirely for constantly causing trouble.