Big try at gravity wheel

[Marsing]

The Quotes are automated....when responding.
I suggest if you do not wish to discuss my machine on this thread - do not bring it up.
Especially do not make assertions that are not true - such as external input required.

Thanks.

Mrwayne,

I made comparison between nature machine and man made machine which is actually your machine according to prev posts, if it not yours, i won't. 
So if you not require additional energy to complete the cycle,  how can it be ?, half cycle..?
Why don't you say " to complete the cycle, my machine uses energy results of the previous half-cycle",   satisfied....   I don't use this because I have not seen it from your machine.
I have no objections whether you want to discuss here or not,  just think about others who tried to bring it back to the track or want to discuss something else.

[mrwayne]

Mrwayne,

I made comparison between nature machine and man made machine which is actually your machine according to prev posts, if it not yours, i won't. 
So if you not require additional energy to complete the cycle,  how can it be ?, half cycle..?
Why don't you say " to complete the cycle, my machine uses energy results of the previous half-cycle",   satisfied....   I don't use this because I have not seen it from your machine.
I have no objections whether you want to discuss here or not,  just think about others who tried to bring it back to the track or want to discuss something else.

Marsing - I went back and looked : My sincere apology for my mistake and I will be more careful - I understand it was not your insults.
Like many of us - I am finding out - it is normal to skip reading as soon as the first ignorant comment.
Again, my apology.
And I hope this thread returns to its original intent as well.
Marsing, before I go - when you asked
"So if you not require additional energy to complete the cycle,  how can it be ?, half cycle..?
Why don't you say " to complete the cycle, my machine uses energy results of the previous half-cycle",   satisfied...."
I am glad you understood that part 

Wayne

[timaleric]

I READ AS MUCH AS I CAN  /ANYBODY WHO IS ANY BODY KNOW WHAT GOES DOWN COMES BACK WITH LESS
I HAVE A SUPERBALL THAT IS 95% EFF. JUST SAYING

[mrwayne]

I READ AS MUCH AS I CAN  /ANYBODY WHO IS ANY BODY KNOW WHAT GOES DOWN COMES BACK WITH LESS
I HAVE A SUPERBALL THAT IS 95% EFF. JUST SAYING

If you are referring to the ZED system - please consider commenting on that thread.
Before I go, if you are responding to the ZED.....
Just call me Nobody lol....

Because Nobody has a Net energy system....lol.
Just having fun back with you.
If you read the right threads - and the whole thing - you would know that the puppets keep trying to say we lift and drop weights..... maybe someone else has that actual thread.

We have a amplification system, that in function reduces the input thru a unique process which reduces the input volume and increases the speed of operation - and redistributes potential energy without consuming it.

Not quite a bouncy ball... ours carries a load and bounces back.
I admit - the diversions here trying to turn our system into a brick - have been awesome.

Thanks again,
Nobody

[MileHigh]

We have a amplification system, that in function reduces the input thru a unique process which reduces the input volume and increases the speed of operation - and redistributes potential energy without consuming it.

When are you going to demonstrate it running stand-alone driving a load continuously?

Will you drive a generator hooked up to a big resistive load?

How much continuous 24/7 power will it output?