Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Finally! Independent Testing Of Rossi's E-Cat Cold Fusion Device. Success?

Started by rukiddingme, May 21, 2013, 12:06:50 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Poit

"Should be revealed later this summer." ahhhhhh keeping up with traditations I see.... everything is always just around the corner..........

If you remember, Rossi's E-Cat was suppose to "reach market by October 2011"!!

in the free energy movement, there is no tomorrow, you either have proof now or you got nothing at all..

Zeitmaschine

Isn't that strange? A Pilot Customer for ECAT 1 MW plant is wanted in Sweden for »nothing at all«. ::)



MarkE

Determining output power using an IR camera is fraught with major sources of potential error.  Looking at their calculated values for radiated and convected heat one may observe that they had initial readings at ~800W input with reported 1733W radiated and 386W convected.  They increased the input power by 105W, IE and the convected values to 432W.   Input power increased by 13.1% and the calculated convection increased by 11.9%.  But the calculated radiated power increased to 2451W, a 41% increase in calculated output.  This strongly suggests that the calculations for radiated power are wrong.  Since the vast majority of output is based on the calculated radiated power, this is a major issue.

fritz

Quote from: MarkE on October 08, 2014, 04:08:06 PM
(..) They increased the input power by 105W, IE and the convected values to 432W.   Input power increased by 13.1% and the calculated convection increased by 11.9%.  But the calculated radiated power increased to 2451W, a 41% increase in calculated output.  (...)

To sum it up - you assume a strong nonlinear increase in COP as suspicious(!?)

The results are awesome - even if there would be an  systematical error of 50%.....