Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The improved Flynn Gap.

Started by synchro1, May 27, 2013, 06:29:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

synchro1

Flynn measures 421 grams of lifting force with one bar magnet across the keepers. A second magnet delivers 1721 grams of lifting force. That's over FOUR times the strength. The magnet switch relay magnifies it's strength by a factor of FOUR times coupled with a PM of equal strength bridging the keepers. .

synchro1

                       LUTEC had a rotor geometry and commutator patented for their overunity generator.. The attraction event commenced when the puck shaped rotor was close to 25% into the keeper. The anihilation event triggers at TDC and carries foward untill the rotor's at 90 degrees. What ever happened to that outfit?

synchro1

The stated overunity of 362% in this generator is nearly exactly that of the Flynn coupling advantage: Look at the size of the timing wheel. I believe I'm at work redesigning their motor.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDDWhr84h0Q&list=PL84345FD1B3F576B2&index=18

They're using a current reversal circuit, thus the similarity. Apparently it stops there because it includes repulsion. Something to think about!

Quote from the LUTEC patent:

"That same principle is one of the reasons the Lutec 1000 motor turns, it is of course the spinning of the centre core of the motor which is caused by the permanent magnets being attracted and then repulsed from the steel cores of the fixed stator coils. It is this primary movement that allows the magnetic fields around the stator coils to be "cut" by the effect of the permanent magnets sweeping past the steel cores of the coils".

synchro1

              Two relays in the keepers instead of the magnet would allow for the doubling of force but also a repulsion event. In which case rotor magnets would be needed. I believe this configuration would yield the same COP  as the attraction version. The relays would be charged together then reversed together at rotor TDC, and held for a time.

              On further consideration, if  LUTEC uses a single solinoid coil, then the coupling advantage Twin Flynn Relays produce may boost the COP to over 10! Imagine a 4 Twin relay horseshoe power coil stator, and 4 pancake output coils. We can call this the "Flutec"!

synchro1

A third relay in the keepers would double the strength of the first two according to flynn's coupling rules. "THREE RELAY STATORS' with an attraction event followed by a current reversing repulsion event at TDC, and strong opposed neo disks on the rotor looks like the best approach so far. Then we'd get 8 times the strength of one relay for the cost of  3!