Magnet coil cores, demagnetization power and Lenz delay.

[MarkE]

You create distance. The further a gun's fired from your ear the longer it takes for the noise to reach you.

The trouble there is that the transit velocity is constant (let's not get picky about humidity and air pressure over time) and the distance is constant leading to a constant delay between any event and the observer.  There is not any distance you can locate the observer where the receive free energy due to their position.

[MarkE]

Here's the link to the GAP motor video. kEhYo has a Hall effect sensor and mosfet powering one strand of a bifilar coil, the other strand gathers output from the pole reversal. My design calls for a single wire coil and a DPDT Reed Relay. The relay wires to the battery for the neutralization pulse, then goes normally open to a storage capacitor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxrJoGZy1to

Here's a link for a DPDT Reed Relay:

http://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/reed-relays/3491774/

The Reed Relay has eight pins. Two of the pins are for mounting and are inert. The GAP motor would have the two neutralization coils in series, leaving two leads which would solder to the center pins. The battery in series with a potentiometer would attach to the normally open pins on one end, and the storage capacitor in series with a fast switching diode would attach to the normally closed set of pins on the other end. The Reed Relay triggers from one pole and that's the pole you want to face out from the monopole rotor. You can easily test the relay for the closed side with a battery and 12 volt light bulb. Also the trigger pole polarity.

If you are happy with mechanical contacts that is fine.  Personally, I would wire up transistors in order to close down the timing variability and problems with contact bounce.
I've watched that video before and found nothing out of the ordinary.

[synchro1]

Sure it is and does, but that does not equate to JLN's set-up evaluating the supposed LENZ delay that he claims.  We could start with the fact that if anything were affected it would be the Faraday Induction.  Lenz refers only to the direction of induced current, not whether or not induction occurs or is somehow delayed.  But the big deal here is that he is just changing coupling coefficients in an inefficient system and noting where he gets better or worse results.

As the rotor magnet approaches the output coil, a magnetic field appears in the coil that opposes the passage of the passing magnet. Positioning the output coil 30mm down an iron core delays the formation of the opposing field in the coil. This has nothing to do with current. The delay is in the output cole field development. The propulsion is a consequence of the field appearing late behind TDC resulting in a shove instead early in opposition causing drag. Lenz force can be positive or negative. Reversed it imparts a power pulse while still generating current in the output windings. This results in net gain.

[MarkE]

As the rotor magnet approaches the output coil, a

changing

magnetic field appears in

cuts

the coil that opposes the passage of the passing magnet.

induces a  voltage and resulting current that opposes the change in magnetic field that created it.

Positioning the output coil 30mm down a iron core

results in eddy currents in the rod that do the same thing, and while the eddy currents flow reduce the magnitude of the field that cuts through the coil creating the apparent delay.

delays the formation of the opposing field in the coil. This has nothing to do with current. The delay is in the output field development.

This apparent delay is an ordinary consequence of Faraday induction and Lenz' Law acting on the iron rod.

The propulsion is a consequence of the field appearing late behind TDC resulting in a shove instead early in opposition causing drag.

This is claimed propulsion that the experiment does not actually demonstrate.

Lenz force can be positive or negative. Reversed it imparts a power pulse while still generating current in the output windings. This results in net gain.

Absolutely not.  Lenz' Law defines the direction of an induced voltage and it defines it in such a way that is consistent with Conservation of Energy.

[synchro1]

changingcutsinduces a  voltage and resulting current that opposes the change in magnetic field that created it. results in eddy currents in the rod that do the same thing, and while the eddy currents flow reduce the magnitude of the field that cuts through the coil creating the apparent delay. This apparent delay is an ordinary consequence of Faraday induction and Lenz' Law acting on the iron rod.This is claimed propulsion that the experiment does not actually demonstrate. Absolutely not.  Lenz' Law defines the direction of an induced voltage and it defines it in such a way that is consistent with Conservation of Energy.

Says you!