Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

[TinselKoala]

For the sake of reference, here are the schematics in question. The first is the schematic claimed in the paper, which does NOT bypass the "shunt",  and the second is the ACTUAL schematic as used by Ainslie and Martin in both the March 2011 demo and the June 2013 demo, and in every photograph of the device ever published including the single mosfet version and the version on PESN now.

The second schematic is what Weir wants them to publish, as it is the actual schematic used and illustrates the bypass. The first schematic, claiming no bypass and a ground-isolated FG,  only appeared AFTER the bypass problem was discovered and discussed, back in 2011.

[TinselKoala]

This situation is described by S.Weir and discussed with Donny and Rosie from about 11:30 on in this clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAz1Snh75HY

[orbut 3000]

This whole Ainslie thing is utterly confusing. It would be nice to have a succinct summary of claims vs. criticism in a form that is digestible by an average human brain. These endless repetitive arguments simply aren't sufficient to resolve the matter.


Start a blog somewhere and post a structured analysis of the claims vs. the actual experimentally derived facts. This only needs to be done one time. And after that's done, the thing only needs to be updated.
There are many free hosting services like tumblr, filckr, vimeo etc. that would be helpful to create a curated documentation of the Ainslie claims vs. actual measurements.


But please understand that this endless recursive argument can only end in the grave or insanity.


Thank you.

[profitis]

@markdansie..you cannot disprove the karpen device  overunity.you cannot and you will not its as simple as that.you will try test A and fail.you will try test B and fail.you will try tests C,D and E ,and fail.you will even try chemical and mass spectroscopy and fail.you will desperately try to kill the voltage,the current but alas,you will fail.you will even try to at least reduce the voltage,current,yet fail. It is the most robust,stubborn,resilient and menacing 2lot antagonist i have ever seen.GBEM? now theres something interesting.i smell money,aaaah

[TinselKoala]

@markdansie..you cannot disprove the karpen device  overunity.you cannot and you will not its as simple as that.you will try test A and fail.you will try test B and fail.you will try tests C,D and E ,and fail.you will even try chemical and mass spectroscopy and fail.you will desperately try to kill the voltage,the current but alas,you will fail.you will even try to at least reduce the voltage,current,yet fail. It is the most robust,stubborn,resilient and menacing 2lot antagonist i have ever seen.GBEM? now theres something interesting.i smell money,aaaah

YOU ARE OFF THE TOPIC OF THIS THREAD.

I HAVE ASKED YOU OVER AND OVER AGAIN TO START YOUR OWN THREAD IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT YOUR DEVICES FOR WHICH YOU PROVIDE NO EVIDENCE.

Yet you won't. What does that indicate?