Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

[TinselKoala]

This whole Ainslie thing is utterly confusing. It would be nice to have a succinct summary of claims vs. criticism in a form that is digestible by an average human brain. These endless repetitive arguments simply aren't sufficient to resolve the matter.

They certainly are sufficient. Read Ainslie's papers for yourself and note the claims. Then look at my videos above. Tell me, AFTER you have done that, whether or not the claims in the papers are refuted by my demonstrations and analysis. It will take you four hours, if you are really interested.

Start a blog somewhere and post a structured analysis of the claims vs. the actual experimentally derived facts. This only needs to be done one time. And after that's done, the thing only needs to be updated.
There are many free hosting services like tumblr, filckr, vimeo etc. that would be helpful to create a curated documentation of the Ainslie claims vs. actual measurements.

But please understand that this endless recursive argument can only end in the grave or insanity.

Thank you.

What you are suggesting has been done, and Ainslie ignores it. This thread here, for instance, was only begun AFTER Ainslie herself resurrected the issue by posting a promise of a demonstration, on PESN, that was to occur on June 1.  But Ainslie has not watched a single one of my videos explaining her circuit. Then she attracted Mark Dansie's attention and started up with her claims on his forum. She is like a zombie that won't stay put down. But with this last display of hers, there is finally enough irrefutable information in the form of her own words, the words of Donovan Martin, and the scopeshots they made, to be able to discount and disprove her very simply whenever she might raise her head up again. Even as her claims change from day to day, as they are wont to do. I haven't heard her claim COP>INFINITY for a while now, but she certainly was claiming that for a while.

It should be clear by now that even S.Weir, after a total exposure of a couple of hours, understands that circuit and the measurements better than the Donovan Martin-Rosemary Ainslie team does after thirteen years of working with it.

Meanwhile I will continue to add new information, like my analyses above, that refute her silly claims one by one and as she makes them. If you don't like to watch... then don't.

Just put me on your ignore list, I don't mind at all.

[SeaMonkey]

Just put me on your ignore list, I don't mind at all.

Splendid!    Top Drawer!

Recursive=Endless Loop

Reset=Finis

Power Off=The End

[profitis]

lol@seamonkey.tinselkoala is loopdeloop

[TinselKoala]

Trolls. Stalkers. Unable to contribute substantively to the discussion, they post irrelevancies, insults and distractions, designed to get an emotional response, and they follow particular posters from thread to thread.

Further, they often make claims that they cannot themselves support with demonstrations or data of their own. They are, in short, useless wastes of bandwidth.

I refer specifically to SeaMonkey and profitis, in case there was any doubt.

[SeaMonkey]

Most interesting commentary.  One can
only wonder how you were able to so
correctly self-diagnose!

Look, the circuit that you've written volumes
about is a dead end.  It is a novel example
of how things can go wrong when wires are
mis-connected.

Could the circuit be resuscitated with simple
modification to perform with efficiency?

Aye, it could.  And you've amply demonstrated
that you have the ability to apply innovative
solutions when sufficiently motivated.

But then, this discussion is not really about the
circuit and how it could be made to work.    This
discussion is much more akin to a long distance
love affair gone obsessively awry  - a vendetta
with a passion.    This pursuit is also a dead end.

Time to switch the power off on this channel
and look for something with true substance.

Have no fear - in time the hurt will go away.