Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

[CuriousChris]

Hi TK

Interesting you see RA as the Patsy not the instigator. I'll have to take your word for it. I wrote her off as a lost cause some years back.

My conflict with her was not that interesting, If I recall I think I tried to point out her cct was a simple oscillator. That there are billions of such devices in use everywhere. What makes her think her version was somehow special. I think she had made the infinite COP claim about that time and then backed off denying she ever said that.

I suggested proper tests. She responded with tests were not for her but for "the physicists" or something similar, but was hugely abusive as you noted. Normally I will play tag in that sort of game but felt this one was not worth pursuing. too much verbiage, which is of course her weapon of choice.

As to her state of mind. I hope you realise I was being polite.

I haven't gone through any of your snake oil videos apart from the cheese one. Time is not my friend but I will certainly try.

Good luck on your quest.

CC

[poynt99]

@.99.....
I am flabbergasted by Ainslie's latest. It is as if Saturday never happened. Just as I predicted, she is now apparently trying to claim that they DID reproduce the Figure 3 scopeshot and can do so at will. Of course she means "little current" and not zero current, and she means 8... or is it 9 volts to the gate and not 12 as the Figure 3 shows....

TK,

It is somewhat surprising to see this response, yes. It had seemed Weir made some progress with Rose's understanding and acceptance of error, but perhaps we overestimated that to some degree.

Empirical results speak louder than words, the only question remaining is will Rose accept them? We shall soon see.

[TinselKoala]

Hi TK
for what it is worth I think Donavan assisted in good faith and should not be subjected to demand like these. I agree it would be good if he could express his opinion, however I think his willingness to help we should all be thankful for.
Mark

Donovan Martin's name is on the papers as second author. In the "real world" of scientific criticism that makes him fair game, and doubly so by his participation in the demonstration. It should be abundantly clear by now that RA herself cannot build or operate "her" apparatus at all and is totally dependent on "Donny". You may think that he should not be "subjected to demand".... but I disagree. The events of Saturday show quite clearly that he is the one with the knowledge and skillset that Ainslie herself lacks. So let him explain himself in his own words. It's clear that Ainslie does not even speak the language of electrical engineering, but Martin does. So he should be fielding questions and monitoring discussions. Or... he could always remove his authorship of the papers. That would get him off the hook he placed himself on, this Saturday past.

Donovan Martin is also the narrator for the March 2011 demonstration.... where he has already told at least two lies in the first minute.
(He gestures towards a paper schematic that shows a single mosfet, a gate series resistor and no FG black lead connection and says something like "this is the schematic"-- of course it is not --  then he gestures to the apparatus and says "five mosfets in parallel" and of course they are not...)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8AIRkWF55k

SO I am afraid that I will have to disagree, strongly, with your statement "Donavan assisted in good faith and should not be subjected to demand like these." (sic)

[TinselKoala]

As somebody that has been following this saga since the beginning it seems only right that we get to the truth about the deception and lies, anyone that has supported these bogus claims should be made accountable.

Agree 100 percent. How could anyone disagree? I just don't get it.

[TinselKoala]

Hi TK

Interesting you see RA as the Patsy not the instigator. I'll have to take your word for it. I wrote her off as a lost cause some years back.

My conflict with her was not that interesting, If I recall I think I tried to point out her cct was a simple oscillator. That there are billions of such devices in use everywhere. What makes her think her version was somehow special. I think she had made the infinite COP claim about that time and then backed off denying she ever said that.

I have recorded plenty of instances where she has made the COP INFINITY or even COP>infinity claims, and the most recent ones are from just last week, I think, I'll have to check the database. I think the COP she claims at any given time is directly related to the amount of "Old Academics" she's had for breakfast.

I suggested proper tests. She responded with tests were not for her but for "the physicists" or something similar, but was hugely abusive as you noted. Normally I will play tag in that sort of game but felt this one was not worth pursuing. too much verbiage, which is of course her weapon of choice.

As to her state of mind. I hope you realise I was being polite.

Got it. I am long past being polite to Ainslie, she has insulted me waaay too much.

I haven't gone through any of your snake oil videos apart from the cheese one. Time is not my friend but I will certainly try.

Good luck on your quest.

CC

Thanks, CC and I hope you find the vids amusing, if you have time to take a look. Thanks for watching and commenting. I'll point out that none, not a one, of my nearly 500 videos is "monetized" or makes you watch an advert. (This makes me either stupid or altruistic, or maybe both. Maybe there's no difference.)