Agha Waqar running Car on his HHO Fuel Cell

[markdansie]

@pirate.im not going to show shit.i demand a salary from a one mark(darth) dansie,skeptic,then let him decide if he wants to show you my shit.

I am an open public target and am happy to receive criticism. More than a few members of this community have taken me to task at times (they were right). However please have respect for people like Bill who is one of the most decent people on the planet,  and Tinman who has everyone's respect and admiration not only here but in other circles as well.


As far as show me the money demands, i always have a show me the goods first (under NDA) Given 99.9% of all overunity claims have proven false in the past you need to have something pretty convincing. I have d=seen people in your country taken for hundreds of thousands of dollars by the free energy scam artists.  One even fooled the TUV engineer. Soto convince me........show me the data.
Kind Regards as always

[ramset]

Mark
you are the Tip of a spear called commerce,looking for products and innovations for your own personal gain .

An NDA?
perhaps a 10 ft pole ?


Chet

[markdansie]

@Ramset


I leave it up to the innovators and inventors if they want to go public with anything. So it is they who want an NDA.
Sometimes it is extended to a non compete. They are legal hard to enforce so in many ways it shows intent.
The reasons they want non disclosure vary for a number of reasons.
1. they want to protect their IP
2. They want to protect their identities (I am one of the few here that uses his real name)
3. Not to be embarrassed if we test what they have and find it failed or they stuffed up(most of the time)
4. To stop people bugging them (like Sterling always wants to cut a deal)


In this case if Profitis wants to show me something under NDA that's fine. I never pay to look at something. I have one inventor at the moment wants over 10 million for a look inside a device.


I normally do not charge for my advice to the many experimenters etc, unless there is a lot of travel or other expenses. If its a company I do be it a technology company or a investment company.


On this forum I share experiences and like with Rosemary Ainslie help organised a public demonstration of her technology with qualified people. If its my own knowledge and experience I freely share.  If it is some one else IP they asked to protect that is their right. I never judge.
But let me ask you, if someone sunk in 15 million dollars or sacrificed thirty years of their life they have a right to choose if they want to give it away or not.


As far as under the radar projects, some are people who do not want the like of Sterling bugging them, some involve a lot of money. However the majority are interested in bettering mankind.


My role is often to disseminate information which I am pleased to say often results in productive introductions. Just this week I introduced Tinman to an inventor who had been working on his own for many years. I am sure they will become great friends and both benefit. I will assist in other advice (non technical) and often I ma just the guy they talk to rather than talking to the wall. To people like this I give my time freely and always will.


I am no hero or angel, personally investigating these technologies has cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and away from family, so I may be a little jaded when I see BS. Fro that I am sorry and acted unprofessionally.


I hope that clarifies a few items, happy to ask any questions.


Kind Regards

[ramset]

Mark
It has been my experience in life that temptation chases every man ,some are more benevolent then others however ultimately we all must eat?

Thats where this part needs focus [temptation].

When you make your living putting people together to make them or yourself money
you are the Fox in the hen house at an open source forum..........

To be beyond reproach would require an attitude such as Stephan Hartman has... no "business interest" or connections to industry and the "profit" machine.
I am not saying he is perfect ,what I am saying is this needs to be a Service, a calling to complete dedication with no "strings" attached!

Those Strings quickly become a web...........



thx
Chet

[profitis]

@markdansie,personaly i wouldnt want an n.d.a.,just the 2year salary,collabaration of research with whomever.if the interested party wanted an n.d.a. i would be happy to oblige.n.d.a,s are worthless most of the time anyways in my opinion.of course i would gladly show the party the goods,knowing that they will keep me very closeby for the next 2years non-stop,and probably sign me on for another 2years after that.ive contributed already a great deal to the quest for overunity here,e.g.explaining clearly the secrets of self-sustaining gaseous electrodes.judging by the number of inbox congratulations i get from viewers i know i have given something worthwhile here and will continue to do so.