Self-sustained power generator

[weston14]

@TinselKoala  I could be on my fifth cold one and still see no flywheel am I missing something ? where is the flywheel
I did not just turned the motor-generator concept  vertical it has something extra "Kinetic Energy"
And unless you can named one person who has try what is depicted in here then yes I have something new and kind of special
You talk about over unity I never did claim it , thanks to Einstein I do not believe in over unity   
Power multiplication device only if you want to see it that way  I wouldn't even claim over 100% efficiency and still this system would give in electrical power more wattage than it is being use , that doesn't mean over unity .  And I do believe that if every thing needed is put together  in front of any level of skilled men it would be like legos they would  figure it out and make it work no high skill level required . Thanks for your comment .

[weston14]

@Low-Q  the dynamo was only for showing purposes you can not compare it to an alternator or wind power generator . I do not claim less energy input , what I claim is the use of less electrical energy on the motor , then you add up kinetic energy , then transform it to electric energy through the mechanism and you get more electric energy never ever I claim more energy itself  coming out of this system than what is involve in the same . Like I said before thanks to Einstein I do not believe in over unity . 
Thanks for your comment .

[weston14]

@FatBird  Thanks for your support .

[weston14]

@Liberty Thank you . Again this is not an over unity device the mechanism uses kinetic energy to transform it to electricity that energy surpasses the loss of energy by friction heat gravity etc.


@LibreEnergia  To your first question No not a perpetual  motion device .
Then you need to leave the flywheel out of this , there is no flywheel involved in this system ,  where do you leave the kinetic energy involved in this system in your example ? Instead you should say 500watts in the motor causing movement on a body , inducing torque on a shaft , spinning a generator , powering an inverter , add all up in joules  and you'll see there is not over unity involved and yet electric power output is more and is not a 100% efficient yet it should work .
In one of your comments you mention momentum and then you say on this one you must integrate any power measurements over the time it is applied to come up with an energy balance for the device. I'd be a fool to ask my self how much energy can fit into one second it is absurd I must say that in one cycle of this mechanism there is energy balance if you don't leave kinetic energy out . I rather would like  you to consider this as  schrodinger's cat example with all of us inside the box some of us being vials of either poison or antidote right now until one of them breaks meaning somebody proves it right or wrong   this mechanism dose not and it dose work at the same time  , fair enough?

[weston14]

here is the link again    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1WR7OJHryM     thanks to all for watching.