New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

[Pirate88179]

Seamonkey:

"Sounds like a copout"....no, it sounds like total B.S. to me...with all due respect of course.  Either someone knows something...or they don't.  Not wanting to "spoonfeed" to me is just like saying..."I really have no idea at all."

This is an OPEN SOURCE forum so IF you actually know something and do not want to "spoonfeed"...(ie share) then why are you here?  My personal tendency is to think that you really have no idea what you are talking about.  Sorry, but that is the way you come across.

I have learned a lot from many of the folks on this forum over the years and not one of them would claim that they "spoonfed" me.

Bill

[SeaMonkey]

Well you tried Bill, but no dice.  Why would I
deprive you of the opportunity to seek and
discover by means of your own initiative?

It is not complicated and all of the essentials
are already on the table.  All that remains is
the "creative tinkering" to optimize/enhance
the transfer function.

And no, it is not the "Ainslie Circuit" as Poynt
suggested.  Off the shelf heating elements made
for use in hot water heaters are less than desirable.

Think, innovate, be creative!    Or not.

Show us your mettle.

I know it's tough in this era of instant gratification
when thinking one's way through challenging problems
is uncool or boring.    Or takes too much time...

I suspect Gyulasun will be the one to show all that
it is really just a piece of cake!

Is Carbon still used for anything?

P.S.  Learning from others can become an enervating
crutch which stymies self development.  Dare to
stand on your own latent abilities.

[gyulasun]

...
I suspect Gyulasun will be the one to show all that it is really just a piece of cake!
...

Hi SeaMonkey,

Because you seem to misunderstand my posts: the reason I showed you those Linear Tech devices is to make you realize that 98% efficiency is the maximum which modern devices are able to achieve and the lack of this 2% is very, very far away from the 100% level, not to mention COP > 1 performance. So if you happen to have further innovative and creative ideas to defeat even the missing 2%  then please go ahead and show them.  Talk is simple.  Afterall, as you wrote:

It is not complicated and all of the essentials are already on the table.  All that remains is the "creative tinkering" to optimize/enhance the transfer function. 

You surely sound like the champion of words and I give you first place in that... 

...
Is Carbon still used for anything?
....

Well, your question makes me wonder, to say the least.  Just google for instance nano carbon, to touch the tip of a huge iceberg and there are many such carbon "icebergs" i.e. application areas.

Gyula

[TinselKoala]

Not even a whole week has passed since Ainslie fell flat on her face in public.... and she is BAAAACK, nearly in full form already.

The PROVEN AND ADMITTED FACT that she FALSIFIED DATA in her daft manuscripts, and has been lying about it for over two years, is apparently lost on this Queen of Trolls. She still has the temerity to make her false claims and her amazing insults.

I WARN YOU ONCE AGAIN, AINSLIE TROLL: EVERY ONE OF THESE INSULTS YOU SLING IS GOING INTO MY DATABASE, and will wind up being seen by anyone you try to foist your bogus lying claims onto. I promise you that! So keep it up, it is very amusing to see you reveal your true "character" as a vile, demented troll.

Also, I will be filing a complaint with the Engineering Council of South Africa
http://www.ecsa.co.za/
and the IEEE subbranch
http://www.ieee.org.za/
and
http://www.saiee.org.za/
concerning the participation of Donovan Martin in the postings of fraudulent data that appears under his name. I will be including in my complaint the "Donny Blooper Reel", the full March 2011 demonstration video, and other data that proves Donovan Martin has his name on false papers, and has engaged in fraudulent demonstrations of the device. It was a mistake, AINSLIE, for you to have Donny lie for you in the March 2011 video.
http://www.ecsa.co.za/documents/150410_Complainant_Affidavit.doc

Why am I doing this, instead of just letting it ride? Ask ROSEMARY AINSLIE.

"This retraction relates to the this circuit variant and does NOT represent a retraction of the claims in the Quantum paper published in 2002 a copy of which can be found at this link..."

But that paper used the SAME BOGUS MEASUREMENTS, and it is DEFINITELY PROVEN that the schematic in the paper CANNOT PRODUCE THE DUTY CYCLE CLAIMED BY AINSLIE. And the circuit is just the present circuit, but without the magic Q2s!  So OK, Ainslie, if you want to embarrass yourself in public YET AGAIN.... go for it, I am ready! It's easy to prove that the schematic does not produce the duty cycle you claim, it's easy to show that you have known this since 2009 and never corrected it, and that makes your EVERY REFERENCE to that article... another AINS-LIE.

Insult me all you like, in fact the more the merrier, it all goes into your Permanent Record and will still be on the internet long after you are gone. But you cannot refute me, never have, and as anyone can see for themselves, you have been utterly and stupidly and arrogantly WRONG for all these years, all these forum posts, and your arrogant uncooperative and insulting attitude is bringing Donovan Martin down with you.


And note this fact well: the NERD claimed circuit below, which appears in the RETRACTED PAPERS, was never actually used by Ainslie and her "nerds" before the August 10, 2013 demo rehearsal. Never! The inclusion of this schematic in the retracted papers is yet another Ains-lie, known for years and never corrected, since the actual schematic they used bypasses the CVR with a current path not accounted for, just as does the Quantum circuit !

[TinselKoala]

Oh... did these videos get buried? Sorry.... here they are again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neME1s-lEZE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPb-3av12AI

And of course if you click on any link, anywhere, to the Rosemary Ainslie - Donovan Martin "papers" what do you see? Is the statement of retraction prominently posted? Is it posted _anywhere_ by Ainslie or Martin, except in her insulting "troll" threads? Of course it isn't.

No... you see the unaltered and uncorrected papers, containing the fabricated Figure 3 scopeshot, the lying schematic diagrams that were not used in the experiments described, the claims that are known to be false ...  and they both still have Donovan Martin's name on them.