Energy from the Ground - Self powered generator by Barbosa and Leal

[nelsonrochaa]

Hi to all, I make my simple replication and one thing i can tell , something strange happens.
See the video   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qsnEchKlc8.
In the moment i prepare a improved version to test.
Any suggestions

[captainkt]

@Farmhand, in the UK the earth is the neutral and I can assure you 100% that running a load/house with live to earth will not alter your meter reading one jot, it is the same as running live to neutral. PME system look up on wikipedia. I tried it for 6 months when my earth leakage trip blew so bypassed the neutral. Readings and bill stayed the same.
Regards
Keith       
PS. I guess I am one of those people that mess with 240V mains and more all the time, even survived a full 440 3 phase mains shock at work from one hand to the other, although it did render me unconscious for a few minutes.

[Farmhand]

Which meter the House meter or the energy meter showing a few watts just before the device.

Yes it all depends on how the residence is wired, every house in the world is not wired the same way.

The guy showed the meter being fooled right on video, the neutral was bypassed and the ground became the return no doubt
about it. I seen the video and it was clear. If one meter can be fooled so can two.

As I said weather the house meter is fooled or not is neither here nor there, if the house meter is not fooled the power is paid for
anyway, if the house meter is fooled the power is stolen.

It's not up to me who messes with what, as long as I give warnings, I'm satisfied.

....

[Farmhand]

I was give up on this. In spite of simplicity of the patent no one can replicate this. 

In order to replicate this the RCD must be bypassed as in the last video, that was a replication and it was a successful one. It just
didn't show what Barbosa and Leal claimed, instead it showed the real picture.

Take it or leave it and replicate it your self. Just don't die trying please.

..

[Farmhand]

DON'T GIVE UP ..  it took a long time to get gold from the ground, and longer still to learn how to process it.
we need to remember that  the electricity company took away the Captor to test it, they also believed it was a device which fooled the meters .. they then tested it (them) to see if they could find that they are unsafe .. when they found nothing the devices had to be returned.
Another point to remember is that the Captor was independently tested whilst running from a battery and the result verified as being six times OU  (6xOU) not more as was found previously when a test measurement was found to be inaccurate.  They have plans to self loop a battery powered unit .. You can be sure that the  (french) electricity company would have stopped them if it could have.  Just the fact that they have not been able to stop them might indicate three things, 1)  it works .. 2)  it needs more development before they see it as being a serious threat .. 3) it doesn't steal electricity.

Just my thoughts, as with the GEET device and developments with Plasma, people are getting closer, the only thing big business can do is to buy up the developments as they hit the market in order to keep the wraps on .. remember  Genpax hydrogen (on demand) electric car developed in Japan .. now controlled by big business but exist it does .. AND IT WORKS .. as do lots of other things.

Yes well if the setup does not steal power and is not dangerous in itself, the energy company can do nothing.
It's only when people disable their RCD and use the actually "fooled" energy meter reading before the device to claim OU that
there is a problem. And if power is not being stolen then it's none of their concern. Why would they even care if no power is
actually being stolen.

The energy company can do nothing about a con man and a stand alone energy meter being fooled. Nothing

But how do you explain the fact that the only iteration of the device that works is the one that does trip the RCD open. And if it
does trip the RCD then it cannot be used as a permanent house installed device. And it is using the ground as the return, which is
inherently very dangerous for household appliances.

If you encourage people to experiment with a device knowing it is dangerous and one of those people you encouraged gets killed by the
device then you ought to take some responsibility for that. Think about that. What are your qualifications skribat ?

...